Object-based classification vs. Pixel-based classification: Comparitive importance of multi-resolution imagery

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives

Volumn 38, Issue 4C7, 2010, Pages

  Weih, Robert C ^a   Riggan, Norman D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Feature analyst; LULC; Multi resolution; Object based classification; PCA; Supervised classification; Unsupervised classification

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE RESOLUTION; LAND USE; PIXELS; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY;

FEATURE ANALYST; LAND USE/LAND COVER; MULTI RESOLUTION; MULTI-TEMPORAL; OBJECT-BASED CLASSIFICATIONS; OVERALL ACCURACIES; PCA; PIXEL BASED CLASSIFICATIONS; SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION; UNSUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84870741841     PISSN: 16821750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Anderson, J.R., E. Hardy, J. Roach, and R. Witmer, 1976. A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 28 p.
2. Blaschke, T., S. Lang, E. Lorup, J. Strobl, and P. Zeil, 2000. Object-oriented image processing in an integrated GIS/remote sensing environment and perspectives for environmental applications, Environmental Information for Planning, Politics, and the Public vol. 2, (Cremers, A. and Greve, K., editors), Metropolis, Marburg, pp. 555-570.
3. Blundell, J.S. and D.W. Opitz, 2006. Object recognition and feature extraction from imagery: the Feature Analyst® approach, Proceedings from 1st International Conference on Object-based Image Analysis, 4-5 July, Salzburg, Austria, URL: http://www.commission4.isprs.org/obia06/papers.htm (accessed: 9 March 2010).
4. Campagnolo, M.L. and J.O. Cerdeira, 2007. Contextual classification of remotely sensed images with integer linear programming, Proceedings of CompIMAGE-Computational Modeling of Objects Represented in Images: Fundamentals, Methods, and Applications, Taylor and Francis, pp. 123-128.
5. Carleer, A.P. and E. Wolff, 2006. Region-based classification potential for land-cover classification with very high spatial resolution satellite data, Proceedings from 1st International Conference on Object-based Image Analysis, 4-5 July, Salzburg, Austria, URL: http://www.commission4.isprs.org/obia06/papers.htm (accessed: 9 March 2010).
6. Congalton, R., and K. Green, 1999. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, CRC/ Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, 137 p.
7. Csatho, B., T. Schenk, D. Lee, and S. Filin, 1999. Inclusion of multispectral data into object recognition, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 32: 53-61.
8. De Jong, S.M., T. Hornstra, and H. Maas, 2001. An integrated spatial and spectral approach to the classification of Mediterranean land cover types: the SSC method, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 3(2):176-183.
9. Dwivedi, R.S., S. Kandrika, and K.V. Ramana, 2004. Comparison of classifiers of remote-sensing data for land-use/land-cover mapping, Current Science, 86(2):328-335.
10. Enderle, D, and R.C. Weih, Jr., 2005. Integrating supervised and unsupervised classification methods to develop a more accurate land cover classification, Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, 59:65-73.
11. Fraser R.H., A. Abuelgasim, and R. Latifovic, 2005. A method for detecting large-scale forest cover change using coarse spatial resolution imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 95:414-427.
12. Gao, Y. and J.F. Mas, 2008. A comparison of the performance of pixel-based and object-based classifications over images with various spatial resolutions, GEOBIA 2008-Pixels, Objects, Intelligence. GEOgraphic Object Based Image Analysis for the 21st Century, (G.J.Hay, T. Blaschke and D. Marceau, editors). University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, ISPRS Vol. No. XXXVIII-4/C1. Archives ISSN No.:1682-1777, 373p.
13. Gitas I.Z., G. Mitri, and G. Ventura, 2004. Object-based image classification for burned area mapping of Creus Cape, Spain, using NOAA-AVHRR imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 92:409-413.
14. Grenzdörffer, G.J., 2005. Land use change in Rostock, Germany since the reunification-a combined approach with satellite data and high resolution aerial images, Proceedings of the ISPRS WG VII/1'Human Settlements and Impact Analysis'-3rd International Symposium Remote Sensing and Data Fusion over Urban Areas (Urban 2005) and 5th International Symposium Remote Sensing of Urban Areas (URS 2005), 14-16 March 2005, Tempe, Arizona, URL: http://www.isprs.org/commission8/workshop-urban (accessed: 9 March 2010).
15. Hay, G.J. and G. Castilla, 2006. Object-based image analysis: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT), Proceedings from 1st International Conference on Object-based Image Analysis, 4-5 July, Salzburg, Austria, URL: http://www.commission4.isprs.org/obia06/papers.htm (accessed: 9 March 2010).
16. Landis J.R. and G.G. Koch, 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33:159-174.
17. Marpa, P.R., I. Niemeyer, and R. Gloaguen, 2006. A procedure for automatic object-based classification, Proceedings from 1st International Conference on Object-based Image Analysis, 4-5 July, Salzburg, Austria, URL: http://www.commission4.isprs.org/obia06/papers.htm (accessed: 9 March 2010).
18. McRoberts, R.E. and E.O. Tomppo, 2007. Remote sensing support for national forest inventories, Remote Sensing of Environment, 110:412-419.
19. Radoux, J., P. Defourny, and P. Bogaert, 2008. Comparison of pixel-and object-based sampling strategies for thematic accuracy assessment, GEOBIA 2008-Pixels, Objects, Intelligence. GEOgraphic Object Based Image Analysis for the 21st Century, (G.J.Hay, T. Blaschke and D. Marceau, editors). University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, ISPRS Vol. No. XXXVIII-4/C1. Archives ISSN No.:1682-1777, 373p.
20. Van de Voorde, T., W. De Genst, F. Canters, N. Stephenne, E. Wolff, and M. Binard, 2004. Extraction of land use/land cover-related information from very high resolution data in urban and suburban areas, Remote Sensing in Transition, Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium of the European Association of Remote Sensing Laboratories, Mill Press, Rotterdam, pp. 237-244.
21. Visual Learning Systems Inc., 2004. Using Feature Analyst® for land cover and land use mapping, Visual Learning Systems White Paper, Missoula, Montana, URL: http://www.featureanalyst.com/featureanalyst/publications.htm (accessed: 9 March 2010).
22. Xian, G. and M. Crane, 2005. Assessments of urban growth in the Tampa Bay watershed using remote sensing data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 97:203-215.
23. Zar, J.H., 2007. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 663 p.