On the potential integration of an ontology-based data access approach in NoSQL stores

Proceedings - 3rd International Conference on Emerging Intelligent Data and Web Technologies, EIDWT 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 166-173

  Curé, Olivier ^a   Kerdjoudj, Fadhela ^a   Faye, David ^b   Le Duc, Chan ^c   Lamolle, Myriam ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ GASTON BERGER   (Senegal)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 8   (France)

Author keywords

Document store; NoSQL; Ontology Based Data Access (OBDA); Social Application; SPARQL

Indexed keywords

BIG DATUM; CONTROL DATA; DATA QUALITY; DECLARATIVE QUERY LANGUAGES; DOCUMENT STORE; INTEGRITY CONSTRAINTS; MEDICAL DOMAINS; NOSQL; ONTOLOGY-BASED DATA ACCESS; PROOF OF CONCEPT; RELATIONAL DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; SEMANTIC KNOWLEDGE; SPARQL;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; RELATIONAL DATABASE SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

EID: 84870741025     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EIDWT.2012.27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. S. Abiteboul, R. Hull, and V. Vianu. Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley, 1995.
2. M. Arenas, L. E. Bertossi, and J. Chomicki. Consistent query answers in inconsistent databases. In PODS, pages 68-79, 1999.
3. F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. F. Patel-Schneider, editors. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
4. D. Calvanese, G. D. Giacomo, D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, A. Poggi, M. Rodriguez-Muro, R. Rosati, M. Ruzzi, and D. F. Savo. The mastro system for ontology-based data access. Semantic Web, 2(1):43-53, 2011.
5. D. Calvanese, G. D. Giacomo, D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati. Tractable reasoning and efficient query answering in description logics: The dl-lite family. J. Autom. Reasoning, 39(3):385-429, 2007.
6. F. Chang, J. Dean, S. Ghemawat, W. C. Hsieh, D. A. Wallach, M. Burrows, T. Chandra, A. Fikes, and R. Gruber. Bigtable: A distributed storage system for structured data (awarded best paper!). In OSDI, pages 205-218, 2006.
7. P. P.-S. Chen. The entity-relationship modeltoward a unified view of data. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 1(1):9-36, Mar. 1976.
8. O. Curé. Improving the data quality of drug databases using conditional dependencies and ontologies. ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality, to appear, 2012.
9. O. Curé, R. Hecht, C. L. Duc, and M. Lamolle. Data integration over nosql stores using access path based mappings. In DEXA (1), pages 481-495, 2011.
10. A. Kalyanpur, B. Parsia, E. Sirin, and J. A. Hendler. Debugging unsatisfiable classes in owl ontologies. J. Web Sem., 3(4):268-293, 2005.
11. D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, R. Rosati, M. Ruzzi, and D. F. Savo. Inconsistency-tolerant semantics for description logics. In RR, pages 103-117, 2010.
12. M. Lenzerini. Data integration: A theoretical perspective. In PODS, pages 233-246, 2002.
13. E. Meijer and G. M. Bierman. A co-relational model of data for large shared data banks. Commun. ACM, 54(4):49-58, 2011.
14. B. Motik, I. Horrocks, and U. Sattler. Bridging the gap between owl and relational databases. In WWW, pages 807-816, 2007.
15. R. Rosati. On the complexity of dealing with inconsistency in description logic ontologies. In IJCAI, pages 1057-1062, 2011.
16. S. Schlobach, Z. Huang, R. Cornet, and F. van Harmelen. Debugging incoherent terminologies. J. Autom. Reasoning, 39(3):317-349, 2007.
17. J. Tao, E. Sirin, J. Bao, and D. L. McGuinness. Integrity constraints in owl. In AAAI, 2010.
18. W. Vogels. Eventually consistent. Commun. ACM, 52(1):40-44, 2009.