Designing continuous auditing for a highly automated procure-to-pay process

Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 153-166

  Faye Borthick, A ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Business process; Continuous auditing; Internal control evaluation; Procureto pay process

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870735921     PISSN: 08887985     EISSN: 15587959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/isys-50233     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alles, M., M. G. Brennan, A. Kogan, and R. P. Srivastava. 2006. Continuous monitoring of business process controls: A pilot implementation of a continuous auditing system at Siemens. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 7: 137-161.
2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1997. The Information Technology Age: Evidential Matter in the Electronic Environment. Jersey City, NJ: AICPA.
3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2004. Codification of Auditing Standards Numbers 1-101. New York, NY: AICPA.
4. Bailey, A. D., Jr., G. L. Duke, J. Gerlach, C.-E. Ko, R. D. Meservy, and A. B. Whinston. 1985. TICOM and the analysis of internal controls. The Accounting Review 60 (2): 186-201.
5. Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI). 2004. Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Version 1.0. Aurora, CO: BPMI. Available at: http://www.bpmi.org/downloads/BPMN-V1.0.pdf
6. Breen, B. 2004. Living in Dell time. Fast Company (November): 96-105. Available at: http://www. fastcompany.com/magazine/88/dell.html
7. CanadianInstituteofCharteredAccountants/AmericanInstituteofCertifiedPublicAccountants(CICA/AICPA). 1999. Continuous Auditing. Research Report. Toronto, Canada: CICA/AICPA.
8. Carnaghan, C. 2006. Business process modeling approaches in the context of process level audit risk assessment: An analysis and comparison. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 7: 170-204.
9. Chan, D. Y., and M. Vasarhelyi. 2011. Innovation and practice of continuous auditing. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 12 (2): 152-160.
10. Glover, B., and H. Bhatt. 2006. RFID Essentials. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
11. Goff, J. 2005. Start with demand: Demand-driven manufacturing is radically altering how some businesses serve customers. CFO Magazine (January): 53-57. Available at: http://cfomagazine.com/article.cfm/ 3515755?f1/4search
12. Kalpic, B., and P. Bernus. 2002. Business process modeling in industry-The powerful tool in enterprise management. Computers in Industry 47: 299-318.
13. Kraemer, K. L., J. Dedrick, and S. Yamashiro. 2000. Refining and extending the business model with information technology: Dell Computer Corporation. The Information Society 16: 5-21.
14. Krishnan, R., J. Peters, R. Padman, and D. Kaplan. 2005. On data reliability assessment in accounting information systems. Information Systems Research 16 (3): 307-326.
15. Lavigne, A. 2003. Electronic Audit Evidence. Toronto, Canada: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.
16. Magretta, J. 2002. Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review 80 (5): 86-92.
17. Murphy, C. 2003. Imagining what's possible. InformationWeek (September 8) 52-56. Available at: http:// www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID1/414500036
18. Null, C. 2005. Dude, you're getting a Dell-Every five seconds. Business 2.0 (December 1): 73. Available at: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/business2_archive/2005/12/01/8364587/index.htm
19. Rezaee, Z., A. Sharbatoghlie, R. Elam, and P. L. McMickle. 2002. Continuous auditing: Building automated auditing capability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 21 (1): 147-163.
20. Vasarhelyi, M. 2002. Concepts in continuous assurance. In Researching Accounting as an Information Systems Discipline, edited by Arnold, V. and S. G. Sutton. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
21. White, S. A. 2004. Introduction to BPMN. Aurora, CO: BPMI. Available at: http://www.bpmi.org/ downloads/Introduction_to_BPMN89.pdf
22. Williamson, A. L. 1997. The implications of electronic evidence. Journal of Accountancy (February): 69-71. Available at: http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/Issues/1997/Feb/implic