The crowded consultation

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 62, Issue 605, 2012, Pages 648-649

  Davies, Peter ^a  

^a Surgery   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSULTATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;

EID: 84870678939     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X659367     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Misselbrook D. Thinking about patients. Newbury: Petroc Press, 2001.
2. Schultz K. Being wrong - adventures in the margin of error. London: Portobello Books Ltd, 2011.
3. Treasure W. Diagnosis and risk management in primary care: words that count, numbers that speak. London: Radcliffe Medical, 2011.
4. Astin M, Griffin T, Neal RD, et al. The diagnostic value of symptoms for colorectal cancer in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2011; 61(586): 231-243.
5. Jones R, Kennedy T. The early detection of colorectal cancer in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 1999; 49(449): 956-958. (Pubitemid 30003942)
6. Davies P, Garbutt G. Should the practice of medicine be a deontological or utilitarian enterprise? J Med Ethics 2011; 37(5): 267-270.
7. Balint M. The doctor, his patient and the illness. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1952.
8. Stott NCH, Davis RH. The exceptional potential in each primary care consultation. J R Coll Gen Pract 1979; 29(201): 201-205.
9. Neighbour R. The inner consultation. 2nd edn. Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd 2004.
10. Davidoff F. Shame: the elephant in the room. BMJ 2002; 324(7338): 623-624. (Pubitemid 34234959)