Acceptance problems of ambient intelligence and mobile technologies in hosptals in India and Germany

17th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Kummer, Tyge F ^a   Bick, Markus ^a   Gururajan, Raj ^b  

^a ESMT European School of Management and Technology   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Acceptance problems; Ambient intelligence; Health care; Mobile technologies; Partial least squares (PLS) modeling; User acceptance

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTANCE PROBLEMS; AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE; MOBILE TECHNOLOGY; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE (PLS); USER ACCEPTANCE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT;

MEDICAL PROBLEMS;

EID: 84870674453     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1998). A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology. Information Systems Research, 9 (2), 204-215.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179-211.
3. Andersen, J. and Bardram, J.E. (2007). BLIG: A New Approach for Sensor Identification, Grouping, and Authorisation in Body Sensor Networks. Proceedings 4th International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN 2007), 223-229.
4. Bardram, J., Baldus, H. and Favela, J. (2006) Pervasive Computing in Hospitals. In Pervasive Computing in Healthcare (Bardram, J., Mihailidis, A. and Wan, D. Eds.), CRC Press, London, 40- 78.
5. Bick, M., Kummer, T. and Rössig, W. (2008) Ambient Intelligence in Medical Environments and Devices. Qualitative Studie zu Nutzenpotentialen ambienter Technologien in Krankenhäusern. ESCP-EAP Working Paper 36.
6. Bohn, J., Coroama, V., Langheinrich, M., Mattern, F. and Rohs, M. (2005). Social, Economic, and Ethical Implications of Ambient Intelligence and Ubiquitous Computing. In Ambient Intelligence (Weber, W., Rabaey, J. and Aarts, E. Eds.), Springer, Berlin. 5-29.
7. Chau, P.Y.K. and Hu, P.J.-H. (2002). Investigating Healthcare Professionals' Decision to Accept Telemedicine Technology: An Empirical Test of Competing Theories. Information and Management, 39 (4), 279-311.
8. Chin, W.W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research (Marcoulides, G. A. Ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 295-336.
9. Chismar, W. G. and Wiley-Patton, S. (2003). Does the Extended Technology Acceptance Model Apply to Physicians? Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'03) - Track 6 - Volume 6IEEE Computer Society.
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
11. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-340.
12. Dawes, J. (2008). Do Data Characteristics Change According to the Number of Scale Points Used? An Experiment Using 5-Point, 7-Point and 10-Point Scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50 (1), 61-77.
13. Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R.J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
14. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. and Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
15. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (1), 39-50.
16. Hair, J.-F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
17. House, R.J. and Javidan, M. (2004). Overview of GLOBE. In Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study in 62 Societies (House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman P.W. and Gupta V. Eds.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi, 9-18.
18. Hu, P.J., Chau, P.Y.K., Sheng, O.R.L. and Kar, Y.T. (1999). Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16 (2), 91-112.
19. ISTAG-IST Advisory Group (2003). Ambient Intelligence: From Vision to Reality. 2003. [WWWDokument: ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/ist/docs/istag-ist2003- consolidated-report.pdf (24.11.2008)].
20. Jayasuriya, R. (1998). Determinants of Microcomputer Technology Use: Implications for Education and Training of Health Staff. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 50 (1), 187-194.
21. Keil, M., Tan, B.C.Y., Wei, K.-K., Saarinen, T., Tuunainen, V. and Wassenaar, A. (2000). A Cross- Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects. MIS Quarterly, 24 (2), 299-325.
22. Lapointe, L., Lamothe, L. and Fortin, J. (2006). The Dynamics of IT Adoption in a Major Change Process in Healthcare Delivery. In E-Health Systems Diffusion and Use: The Innovation, the User and the USE IT Model (Spil, T.A.M. and Schuring, R.W. Eds.), The Idea Group Publishing, London.
23. Macario, A., Morris, D. and Morris, S. (2006). Initial Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Device for Detecting Retained Surgical Gauze Sponges Using Radiofrequency Identification Technology. Arch Surg, 141, 659-662.
24. Morán, E.B., Tentori, M., González, V.M., Favela, J. and Martínez-Garcia, A.I. (2006). Mobility in Hospital Work: Towards a Pervasive Computing Hospital Environment. International Journal of Electronic Healthcare, 3 (1), 72-89.
25. Ong, C.-S., Lai, J.-Y. and Wang, Y.-S. (2004). Factors Affecting Engineers' Acceptance of Asynchronous E-Learning Systems in High-Tech Companies. Information & Management, 41 (6), 795-804.
26. Raitoharju, R. (2007). Information Technology Acceptance in the Finnish Social and Healthcare Sector: Exploring the Effects of Cultural Factors. Turku : Turku School of Economics, Esa Print, Tampere.
27. Regmagnino, P., Hagras, H., Monekosso, N. and Velastin, S. (2005). Ambient Intelligence - A Gentle Introduction. In Ambient Intelligence. A Novel Paradigm (Regmagnino, P., Foresti, G. and Ellis, T. Eds.), Springer, New York, 1-14.
28. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S. and Will, S. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta. http://www.smartpls.de, Hamburg.
29. Spiekermann, S. (2008). User Control in Ubiquitous Computing: Design Alternatives and User Acceptance. Shaker Verlag, Aachen.
30. Spil, T.A.M. and Schuring, R.W. (2006). E-Health Systems Diffusion and Use: The Innovation, the User and the UseIT Model. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey.
31. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V.E., Chatelin, Y.-M. and Lauro, C. (2005). PLS Path Modelling, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 48 (1), 159-205.
32. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11 (4), 342-365.
33. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46 (2), 186-204.
34. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425-478.
35. Weber, W., Rabaey, J. and Aarts, E. (2005). Introduction, In Ambient Intelligence (Weber, W., Rabaey, J. and Aarts, E. Eds.), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1-2.
36. Wold, H. (1974). Causal Flows with Latent Variables: Parting of the Ways in the Light of NIPLAS Modelling. European Economic Review, 5, 67-86.
37. Wold, H. (1982). Soft Modelling: The Basic Design and Some Extensions, In Systems Under Indirect Observation. Part II (Jöreskog K.G., Wold. H. Ed.), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, 1-54.
38. Wu, J.-H., Wanga, S.-C. and Lind, L.-M. (2007). Mobile Computing Acceptance Factors in the Healthcare Industry: A Structural Equation Model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76 (1), 66-77.