Elicitation of situated values: Need for tools to help stakeholders and designers to reflect and communicate

Ethics and Information Technology

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 285-303

  Pommeranz, Alina ^a   Detweiler, Christian ^a   Wiggers, Pascal ^a   Jonker, Catholijn ^a  

^a Mekelweg 4   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Design methods; Self reflection; Situated values; Value elicitation; Value sensitive design

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

DESIGN METHOD; SELF REFLECTION; SITUATED VALUES; VALUE ELICITATIONS; VALUE SENSITIVE DESIGN;

DESIGN;

EID: 84870665610     PISSN: 13881957     EISSN: 15728439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10676-011-9282-6     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(10), 1207-1220.
2. Bresciani, P., Perini, A., Giorgini, P., Giunchiglia, F., & Mylopoulos, J. (2004). Tropos: An agent-oriented software development methodology. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 8(3), 203-236.
3. Cheng, A. S., & Fleischmann, K. R. (2010). Developing a meta-inventory of human values. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47, 1-10.
4. Chung, L., Nixon, B. A., Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J. (1999). Non-functional requirements in software engineering. In International series in software engineering (Vol. 5). Springer.
5. Clark-Ibez, M. (2004). Framing the social world with photo-elicitation interviews. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 1507-1527.
6. Consolvo, S., & Walker, M. (2003). Using the experience sampling method to evaluate ubicomp applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2(2), 24-31.
7. Cysneiros, L., & do Prado Leite, J. (2004). Nonfunctional requirements: From elicitation to conceptual models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30(5), 328-350.
8. Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., & Fickas, S. (1993). Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Science of Computer Programming, 20, 3-50.
9. DeLoach, S., Padgham, L., Perini, A., Susi, A., & Thangarajah, J. (2009). Using three aose toolkits to develop a sample design. International Journal of Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, 3(4), 416-476.
10. Denning, T., Borning, A., Friedman, B., Gill, B., Kohno, T., & Maisel, W. (2010). Patients, pacemakers, and implantable defibrillators: Human values and security for wireless implantable medical devices (pp. 917-926). New York: ACM (CHI '10).
11. Friedman, B., Freier, N. G., Kahn, P., Lin, P., & Sodeman, R. (2008). Office window of the future? Field-based analyses of a new use of a large display. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(6), 452-465.
12. Friedman, B., Hook, K., Gill, B. T., Eidmar, L., Sallmander Prien, C., & Severson, R. L. (2008). Personlig integritet: A comparative study of perceptions of privacy in public places in Sweden and the United States (pp. 142-151). New York: ACM (NordiCHI'08).
13. Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H. J. (2003). Human values, ethics, and design. In J. A. Jacko, & A. Sears (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 1177-1201). UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Friedman, B., Kahn, P., & Borning, A. (2006). Value Sensitive design and information systems. In Human-computer interaction and management information systems: Foundations (pp. 348-372). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
15. Friedman, B., Kahn, P., Hagman, J., Severson, R. L., & Gill, B. (2006). The watcher and the watched: Social judgments about privacy in a public place. Human-Computer Interaction, 21, 235-272.
16. Froehlich, J., Chen, M. Y., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., & Landay, J. A. (2007). Myexperience: A system for tracing and capturing of user feedback on mobile phones. In MobiSys '07. New York: ACM.
17. Gaver, B., Dunne, T., Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. Interactions, 6, 21-29.
18. Gerken, J., Dierdorf, S., Schmid, P., Sautner, A., & Reiterer, H. (2010). Pocket bee: A multi-modal diary for field research. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction: Extending boundaries (pp. 651-654). New York, NY, USA: ACM (NordiCHI '10).
19. Giunchiglia, F., Mylopoulos, J., & Perini, A. (2002). The tropos software development methodology: Processes, models and diagrams. In: AOSE (Vol. 2585, pp. 162-173). Springer.
20. Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17, 13-26.
21. Hodges, B. H., & Baron, R. M. (1992). Values as constraints on affordances-perceiving and acting properly. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22(3), 263-294.
22. Hsieh, G., Li, I., Dey, A., Forlizzi, J., & Hudson, S. E. (2008). Using visualizations to increase compliance in experience sampling. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing (UbiComp '08) (pp. 164-167). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
23. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B. B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., et al. (2003). Technology probes: Inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '03) (pp. 17-24). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
24. Kahn, P. H., Friedman, B., Gill, B. T., Hagman, J., Severson, R. L., Freier, N. G., et al. (2008). A plasma display window? The shifting baseline problem in a technologically-mediated natural word. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), 192-199.
25. Kelly, L., & Jones, G. (2009). Examining the utility of affective response in search of personal lifelogs. In 5th workshop on emotion in HCI, British HCI conference.
26. Khan, V., Markopoulos, P., & Eggen, B. (2009). Features for the future experience sampling tool. In MobileHCI '09. New York: ACM.
27. Kolos-Mazuryk, L., Eck, P., & Wieringa, R. (2006). A survey of requirements engineering methods for pervasive services. Technical report. University of Twente, The Netherlands.
28. Kraemer, F., van Overveld, K., & Peterson, M. (2011). Is there an ethics of algorithms? Ethics and Information Technology, 13(3), 251-260.
29. Krogstie, J. (2001). Requirement engineering for mobile information systems. In Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on requirements engineering: Foundations for software quality (REFSQ'01).
30. LeDantec, C. A., Poole, E. S., & Wyche, S. P. (2009). Values as lived experience: Evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems. Boston, MA, USA: ACM.
31. Li, I., Dey, A., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems. Atlanta, Georgia, USA: ACM.
32. Maio, G. R. (2010). Mental representations of social values. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 1-43.
33. Massonet, P., & van Lamsweerde, A. (1997). Analogical reuse of frameworks. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering (pp. 26-33).
34. Miceli, M., & Castelfranchi, C. (1989). A cognitive approach to values. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19, 169-193.
35. Miller, J. K., Friedman, B., Jancke, G., & Gill, B. (2007). Value tensions in design: The value sensitive design, development, and appropriation of a corporation's groupware system. In Proceedings of GROUP 2007 (pp. 281-290). New York: ACM.
36. Morandini, M., Nguyen, D., Perini, A., Siena, A., & Susi, A. (2008). Tool-supported development with tropos: The conference management system case study. In M. Luck, & L. Padgham (Eds.), Agent-oriented software engineering VIII, lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 4951, pp. 182-196). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
37. Nathan, L., Klasnja, P., & Friedman, B. (2007). Value scenarios: A technique for envisioning systemic effects of new technologies. In CHI'07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 2585-2590). USA: ACM.
38. Nathan, L., Friedman, B., Klasnja, P., Kane, S., & Miller, J. (2008). Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on designing interactive systems (pp. 1-10). USA: ACM.
39. Nuseibeh, B., & Easterbrook, S. (2000). Requirements engineering: A roadmap. In ICSE '00 Proceedings of the conference on the future of software engineering (pp. 35-46). USA: ACM.
40. Pauls, R. (1990). Concepts of value: A multi-disciplinary clarification. Technical report 20. Centre for Resource Management, Lincoln University, Lincoln.
41. Potts, C. (1999). Scenic: A strategy for inquiry-driven requirements determination. In Proceedings of IEEE fourth international symposium on requirements engineering (RE'99) (pp. 58-65).
42. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
43. Sanches, P., Höök, K., Vaara, E., Weymann, C., Bylund, M., Ferreira, P., Peira, N., & Sjölinder, M. (2010). Mind the body! Designing a mobile stress management application encouraging personal reflection. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on designing interactive systems (pp. 47-56). New York, NY, USA: ACM (DIS '10).
44. Schroeder, M. (2008) Value theory. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, fall 2008 edn. Stanford: Stanford University.
45. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878-891.
46. Ståhl, A., Höök, K., Svensson, M., Taylor, A., & Combetto, M. (2009). Experiencing the affective diary. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13(5), 365.
47. Sutcliffe, A. (1998). Scenario-based requirements analysis. Requirements Engineering, 3(1), 48-65.
48. Sutcliffe, A. (2003). Scenario-based requirements engineering. In Requirements engineering conference, 2003. Proceedings. 11th IEEE international (pp. 320-329). IEEE.
49. Thew, S., & Sutcliffe, A. (2008). Investigating the role of 'soft issues' in the re process. In 16th IEEE international requirements engineering, 2008 RE'08 (pp. 63-66).
50. van Lamsweerde, A., & Letier, E. (1998). Integrating obstacles in goal-driven requirements engineering. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on software engineering.
51. van Lamsweerde, A., & Willemet, L. (1998). Inferring declarative requirements specifications from operational scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
52. van Lamsweerde, A., Letier, E., & Darimont, R. (1998). Managing conflicts in goal-driven requirements engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
53. Voida, A., & Mynatt, E. D. (2005). Conveying user values between families and designers. In CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. Portland, OR, USA: ACM.