Considering user attitude and behaviour in persuasive systems design: THE 3D-RAB model

19th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Wiafe, Isaac ^a   Nakata, Keiichi ^a   Moran, Stuart ^a   Gulliver, Stephen R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Behaviour change; Cognitive dissonance; Persuasive technology

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN; APPROPRIATE TECHNIQUES; BEHAVIOUR CHANGE; BEHAVIOURAL CHANGES; COGNITIVE DISSONANCE; COGNITIVE STATE; PERSUASIVE TECHNOLOGY; SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM; USER ATTITUDES;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84870647531     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
2. Aronson, E. (1997). Back to the future: Retrospective review of Leon Festinger's "A theory of cognitive dissonance." The American Journal of Psychology, 110(1), 127-137.
3. Brehm, J. and A. Cohen (1962). Explorations in cognitive dissonance. Wiley New York.
4. Dainton, M. and E. Zelley (2005). Applying communication theory for professional life: A practical introduction. Sage Publications, Inc.
5. Festiger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Row, Peterson, Evanston.
6. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
7. Fogg, B. (2009a). The behavior grid: 35 ways behavior can change. 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Claremont, California, ACM New York, NY, USA.
8. Fogg, B. J. (2009b). Creating persuasive technologies: An eight-step design process. 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Claremont, California, ACM New York, NY, USA.
9. Griffin, E. and G. McClish (1991). A first look at communication theory, McGraw-Hill New York.
10. Harjumaa, M. and H. Oinas-Kukkonen (2007). Persuasion theories and IT design. Persuasive 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4744, 311-314.
11. Harjumaa, M., K. Segerståhl and H. Oinas-Kukkonen (2009). Understanding persuasive software functionality in practice: A field trial of polar FT60. 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Claremont, California, ACM New York, NY, USA.
12. Kantowitz, B., J. Lee, C. Becker, A. Bittner, S. Kantowitz, R. Hanowski, R. Kinghorn, M. McCauley, T. Sharkey and M. McCallum (1996). Development of human factors guidelines for ATIS and CVO: Exploring driver acceptance of in-vehicle information systems, FHWA-RD-96-143, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
13. Kearsley, G. (1999). Explorations in learning & instruction: The theory into practice database. Retrieved 12/10/2010, from http://tip.psychology. org/.
14. Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2010). Behavior change support systems: A research model and agenda. 5th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Copenhagen, Denmark, Springer.
15. Oinas-Kukkonen, H. and M. Harjumaa (2008). A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5033, 164-176.
16. Oinas-Kukkonen, H. and M. Harjumaa (2009). Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24 (1), 485-500.
17. Oldenburg, B., K. Glanz and M. Ffrench (1999). The application of staging models to the understanding of health behaviour change and the promotion of health. Psychology & Health, 14(3), 503-516.
18. Prochaska, J. O. and C. C. DiClemente (1986). Toward a comprehensive model of change. Treating addictive behaviors: Processes of change, Applied Clinical Psychology, 3-27.
19. Radhakrishna, G. and A. Saxena (2005). Application of cognitive dissonance theory to reduce dropouts in distance education system. In ICDE International Conference, 1-5.
20. Räisänen, T., T. Lehto and H. Oinas-Kukkonen (2010). Practical findings from applying the PSD model for evaluating software design specifications. Persuasive Technology, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6137, 185-192.
21. Torning, K. and H. Oinas-Kukkonen (2009). Persuasive system design: State of the art and future directions. 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, ACM New York, NY, USA.