From e-ladder to e-diamond RE-conceptualising models for public e-services

Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Goldkuhl, Göran ^a,b   Persson, Anders ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b JÖNKÖPING INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

E government; Public e service; Socio pragmatism; Stage model

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS; E-GOVERNMENT; E-SERVICES; GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM; RAPID GROWTH; SOCIO-PRAGMATISM; STAGE MODELS; WIDE SPREADS;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

LADDERS;

EID: 84870646407     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Ågerfalk P J (2004) Investigating Actability Dimensions: A Language/Action Perspective on Criteria for Information Systems Evaluation, Interacting with Computers, 16(5), 957-988.
2. ANAO (1999) Electronic Service Delivery, including Internet use by Commonwealth Government Agencies, Australian National Auditing Office, Canberra.
3. Andersen K V (2004), E-government and Public Sector Process Rebuilding (PPR): Dilettantes, Wheelbarrows and Diamonds, Kluwer, Boston.
4. Andersen P B (2001) What semiotics can and cannot do for HCI, Knowledge-Based Systems, 14, 419- 424.
5. Bühler K (1934) Sprachtheorie, Fischer, Jena.
6. eEurope (2002) Web-based Survey on Electronic Public Services (Results of the second measurement: April 2002, ) (EC with CapGemini), Available at: http://europa.eu.int/information-society/eeurope/2002/benchmarking/list/ source-data-pdf/2nd-measurement-final-report-annex.pdf, Accessed: December 10, 2004.
7. eEurope (2005) Online Availability Of Public Services: How Is Europe Progressing?, (EC with Cap Gemini), Available at: http://europa.eu.int/ information-society/eeurope/2005/doc/all-about/online-availability-public- services-5th-measurement-fv4.PDF.
8. Damsgaard J, Sheepers R (2000) Managing the crises in intranet implementation: A Stage Model, Information Systems Journal 10: 131-149.
9. Deloitte Research (2000) At the Dawn of eGovernement - The citizen as consumer, Deloitte Research, New York.
10. rd Intl Conf on Action in Language, Organisations and Information Systems (ALOIS), University of Limerick.
11. Goldkuhl G, Cronholm S, Sjöström J (2004) User Interfaces as Organisational Action Media, in Proc of the 7th International Workshop on Organisational Semiotics, Setúbal, Portugal.
12. Layne K, Lee J (2001), Developing Fully Functional E-government: A four-stage model, Government information quarterly 18(2): 122-136.
13. Hiller J, Bélanger F (2001) Privacy strategies for electronic government, E-government series. Endowment for the business of Government, Pricewaterhouse Coopers, Arlington, VA.
14. King J L, Kraemer K L (1984) Evolution and Organizational Information Systems: An Assessment of Nolan's Stage Model, Communications of the ACM 27(5): 466-475.
15. Nolan R (1973) Managing the computer resource: A stage hypothesis, Communications of the ACM, vol. 16, pp. 399-405.
16. Persson A, Goldkuhl G (2005) Stage-models for public e-services- investigating conceptual foundations, accepted to the 2nd Scandinavian Workshop on e-Government, Copenhagen.
17. Sjöström J, Goldkuhl G (2004) The semiotics of user interfaces - a socio-pragmatic perspective, in Liu K (ed, 2004) Virtual, distributed and flexible organisations. Studies in organisational semiotics, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
18. Statskontoret, (2000) The 24/7 Agency: Criteria for 24/7 Agencies in the Networked Public Administration, Report 2000:41 Statskontoret, Stockholm.
19. Statskontoret, 2004:11 (2004) E-tjänster och besökare på offentliga webbplatser - lägesbeskrivning februari 2004, Statskontoret, Stockholm.
20. UN (2003) World public sector report: E-government at the crossroads, United Nations, New York.