The construction of the relationship between ERP and the organisation through negotiation

Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Elbanna, Amany ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Actor network theory; ERP; Social contructivism; Technology determinism

Indexed keywords

ACTOR NETWORK THEORY; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM; SOCIAL CONTRUCTIVISM;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; INFORMATION THEORY;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84870643974     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. AMR RESEARCH (2004) ERP market. AMR Research, 21 March 2005, www.amrresearch.com.
2. ASAP WORLD CONSULTANCY and BLAIN JEA, " (1996) Using SAP R/3. Que Corporation, Indianapolis.
3. AVGEROU C (2001) The significance of context in information systems and organisational change. Information Systems Journal 11(1), 43-63.
4. AVGEROU C (2002) Information systems and global diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. BLOOMFIELD BP, COOMBS R, KNIGHTS D and LITTLER D (Eds.) (1997) Information technology and organizations: Strategies, networks, and integration. Oxford University Press.
6. BOUDETTE NE (1999) Europe's SAP scrambles to stem big glitches. Wall Street JournalNovember 4.
7. CADILI S and WHITLEY EA (2005) On the interpretive flexibility of hosted ERP systems. Department of Information Systems, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London. Working Paper Series, 131.
8. CALLON M (1993) Variety and irreversibility in networks of technique conception and adoption. In Technology and the wealth of nations (FORAY D and FREEMAN C, Eds), Pinter, London.
9. DAVENPORT TH (1998) Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review (July-August), 121-131.
10. DAVENPORT TH (2000) Mission critical: Realizing the promise of enterprise systems. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
11. FOREMSKI T (1998) Enterprise Resource Planning: A way to open up new areas of business. Financial Times, p 6. 2 Sep.
12. HANSETH O, AANESTAD M and BERG M (2004) Guest editors' introduction- actornetworks theory and information systems. What's so special? Information Technology & People 17(2), 116-123.
13. HUGHES TP (1986) The seamless web: Technology, science, etcetera, etcetera. Social Studies of Science 16(2), 281-292.
14. HUGHES TP (1994) Technological momentum. In Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism (SMITH MR and MARX L, Eds), MIT Press.
15. JAMES G (1997) IT fiascos and how to avoid them. Datamation.
16. KALLINIKOS J (2002) Re-opening the black box of technology: Artifacts and human agency. In Twenty third International Conference on Information Systems, pp 287- 294, Barcelona 14-16 December 2002.
17. KALLINIKOS J (2004) Farewell to contructivism: Technology and context-embedded action. In The social study of information and communication technology (AVGEROU C, Ed), Oxford University Press.
18. KAPLAN B and MAXWELL JA (1994) Qualitative research methods for evaluating computer information systems. In Evaluating health care information systems: Methods and applications (JAY SJ, Ed), pp 45-68, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
19. KLING R and JEWETT T (1994) The social design of worklife with computers and networks: An open natural system perspective. In Advances in computers (YOVITS M, Ed), pp 239-293, Academic Press, Orlando.
20. KOH C, SOH C and MARKUS ML (2000) A process theory approach to ERP implementation and impacts: The case of Revel Asia. Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications 2(1), 4-23.
21. LATOUR B (1988) The pasteurization of france. Harvard University Press.
22. LATOUR B (1999) Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. LATOUR B (2004) On using ANT for studying information systems: A (somewhat) socratic dialogue. In The social study of information and communication technology (AVGEROU C, CIBORRA CU and LAND F, Eds), Oxford University Press.
24. LATOUR B (Ed.) (2005) Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
25. LAW J and CALLON M (1988) Engineering and sociology in a military aircraft project: A network analysis of technological change. Social Problems 35(3), 284-297.
26. MACKAY H (1995) Theorising the IT/society relationship. In Information technology and society: A reader (HEAP N, THOMAS R, EINON G, MASON R and MACKAY H, Eds), The Open University.
27. MACKENZIE D and WAJCMAN J (Eds.) (1999) The social shaping of technology - second edition. Open University Press, Bukingham and Philadelphia.
28. MANETTI J (2001) How technology is transforming manufacturing. Production and Inventory Management Journal 42(1), 54-64.
29. MARKUS LM (2001) Reflections on the systems integration enterprise. Business Process Management Journal Forthcoming., .
30. MARKUS LM, TANIS C and FENEMA PCV (2000) Multisite ERP implementations. Communication of the ACM 43(4), 42-46.
31. MARKUS ML (1983) Power, politics and MIS implementation. Communication of the ACM 26(6), 430-444.
32. MISA TJ (1994) Retrieving sociotechnical change from technological determinism. In Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological deteminism (SMITH MR and MARX L, Eds), The MIT Press.
33. MONTEIRO E (2000) Monsters: From systems to actor-networks. In Planet internet (BRAA K, SORENSEN C and DAHLBOM B, Eds), Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden.
34. MONTEIRO E and HANSETH O (1996) Social shaping of information infrastructure: On being specific about the technology. In Information technology and changes in organizational work (ORLIKOWSKI WJ, WALSHAM G, JONES MR and I. DJ, Eds), pp 325-343, Chapman and Hall, London.
35. MONTOYA S (1998) Foxmeyer files suit against SAP software company. AP WireAugust 27.
36. MYERS MD (1997) Interpretive research in information systems. In Information systems: An emerging discipline (STOWELL F, Ed), pp 239-266, McGraw-Hill, London.
37. NASH K (2000) Companies don't learn from previous IT snafus. Computerworld.
38. ORLIKOWSKI WJ (1991) The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA. Working paper, CISR WP No.219, Sloan WP No. 3141-91, CCSTR No. 105.
39. PINCH TJ and BIJKER WE (1987) The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (BIJKER WE, HUGHES TP and PINCH TJ, Eds), The MIT Press.
40. ROBEY D (1987) Implementation and the organizational impacts of information systems. Interfaces 17(3), 72-84.
41. ROSS JW and VITALE MR (2000) The ERP revolution, surviving vs. Thriving. Information Systems Frontiers; special issue on The Future of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems 2(2), 233-241.
42. SAP AG (2004) SAP annual report 2004. SAP AG.
43. SCRANTON P (1994) Determinism and indeterminacy in the history of technology. In Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism (SMITH MR and MARX L, Eds), The MIT Press.
44. SMITH MR and MARX L (Eds.) (1994) Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism. MIT Press.
45. STAUDENMAIER JM (1985) Technology's storytellers: Reweaving the human fabric. Cambridge, Mass.
46. TRUEX D and NGWENYAMA OK (2000) ERP systems: Facilitating or confounding factors in corporate telecommunications mergers? In The 8th European Conference in Information Systems, Vienna, Austria.
47. WAGNER EL and NEWELL S (2004) 'best' for whom?: The tension between 'best practice' ERP packages and diverse epistemic cultures in a university context. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 13, 305-328.
48. WALSHAM G (2001) Making a world of difference: IT in a global context. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
49. YATES J and VAN MAANEN J (Eds.) (2001) Information technology and organizational transformation. Sage Publications Inc.