A systemizing research framework for WEB 2.0

19th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Steininger, Dennis M ^a   Huntgeburth, Jan C ^a   Veit, Daniel J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Categories; Characteristics; Conceptualization; Framework; Model; Social; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

CATEGORIES; CHARACTERISTICS; CONCEPTUALIZATION; FRAMEWORK; SOCIAL; WEB 2.0;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MODELS; SYSTEMS SCIENCE;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 84870640513     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Abbasi, A., Chen, H. (2008). CyberGate: A Design Framework and System for Text Analysis of Computer-mediated Communication. MIS Quarterly, 32 (4), 811-837.
2. Angelmar, R., Stern, L. W. (1978). Development of a Content Analytic System for Analysis of Bargaining Communication in Marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (1), 93-102.
3. Baechle, M. (2008). Ökonomische Perspektiven des Web 2.0 - Open Innovation, Social Commerce und Enterprise 2.0 (in German). Wirtschaftsinformatik, 50 (2), 129-132.
4. Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and Taxonomies: An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
5. boyd, d. m., Ellison, N. (2008). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1), 210-230.
6. Charniak, E. (1996). Tree-Bank Grammars. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1031-1036,
7. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston.
8. Clemons, E. K. (2009). Business Models for Monetizing Internet Applications and Web Sites: Experience, Theory, and Predictions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26 (2), 15-41.
9. Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., Pfarrer, M. D. (2007). A Content Analysis of the Content Analysis Literature in Organization Studies: Research Themes, Data Sources, and Methodological Refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10 (1), 5-34.
10. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532-550.
11. Frueh, W. (2007). Inhaltsanalyse: Theorie und Praxis (in German). 6th Edition. UVK Verlagsgesellschaft, Konstanz.
12. Ganesh, J., Padmanabhuni, S. (2007). Web 2.0: Conceptual Framework and Research Directions. In AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, 1-9,
13. Gephart, R. P. (1993). The Textual Approach: Risk and Blame in Disaster Sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (6), 1465-1514.
14. Hassan, N., Mathiassen, L. (2009). Combining Scientometric and Content Analysis Methods for Identifying Core Concepts and Action Principles of Information Systems Development. In AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, 1-9,
15. Hayes, A. F., Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1 (1), 77-89.
16. Hendler, J., Golbeck, J. (2008). Metcalfe's law, Web 2.0, and the Semantic Web. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 6 (1), 14-20.
17. Hiltz, S. R., Passerini, K., Dwyer, C. (2007). Trust and Privacy: A Comparison of Facebook and MySpace. AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, 1-12.
18. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison-Wesley, Reading.
19. Insch, G. S., Moore, J. E., Murphy, L. D. (1997). Content Analysis in Leadership Research: Examples, Procedures, and Suggestions for Future Use. Leadership Quarterly, 8 (1), 1-25.
20. Kassarjian, H. (1977). Content Analysis in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 4 (1), 8-18.
21. Krippendorff, K. (2004a). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. 2nd Edition. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
22. Krippendorff, K. (2004b). Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30 (3), 411-433.
23. Lacity, M. C., Janson, M. A. (1994). Understanding Qualitative Data: A Framework of Text Analysis Methods. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11 (2), 137-155.
24. Locke, C., Levine, R., Searls, D., Weinberger, D. (2000). The Cluetrain Manifesto: The End of Business as Usual. 1st Edition. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge.
25. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1 (2), 1-10.
26. Mintzberg, H. (1979). An Emerging Strategy of "Direct" Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (4), 582-589.
27. Moore, J. E. (2000). One Road to Turnover: An Examination of Work Exhaustion in Technology Professionals. MIS Quarterly, 24 (1), 141-168.
28. Morris, R. (1994). Computerized Content Analysis in Management Research: A Demonstration of Advantages and Limitations. Journal of Management, 20 (4), 903-931.
29. Nag, R., Hambrick, D. C., Chen, M.-J. (2007). What is Strategic Management, Really? Inductive Derivation of a Consensus Definition of the Field. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (9), 935-955.
30. O'Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Communications and Strategies, 65 (1), 17-37.
31. Pavlou, P. A., Dimoka, A. (2006). The Nature and Role of Feedback Text Comments in Online Marketplaces: Implications for Trust Building, Price Premiums, and Seller Differentiation. Information Systems Research, 17 (4), 392-414.
32. Saris-Gallhofer, I. N., Saris, W. E., Morton, E. L. (1978). A Validation Study of Holsti's Content Analysis Procedure. Quality and Quantity, 12 (2), 131-145.
33. Scott, W. (1955). Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19 (3), 321-325.
34. Singh, M., Davison, C., Wickramasinghe, N. (2010). Organisational Use of Web 2.0 Technologies: An Australian Perspective. AMCIS 2010 Proceedings.
35. Spiekermann, S., Cranor, L. F. (2009). Engineering privacy. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 35 (1), 67-82.
36. Veit, D., Parasie, N. (2010). Common Data Exchange Standards: Determinants for Adoption at the Municipal Level. AMCIS 2010 Proceedings, 1-10.
37. Wasko, M. M., Faraj, S. (2005). Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly, 29 (1), 35-57.