In search of paradigms: Identifying the theoretical foundations of the is field

18th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Moody, Daniel L ^a   Iacob, Maria Eugenia ^a   Amrit, Chintan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Citation analysis; Disciplinary identity; Scientific status; Theory

Indexed keywords

CITATION ANALYSIS; DISCIPLINARY IDENTITY; REFERENCE DISCIPLINE; RESEARCH FIELDS; RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES; SCIENTIFIC STATUS; THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS; THEORY;

CURRICULA; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84870637512     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (67)

1. Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, Prentice-Hall.
2. Baldwin, C. Y. and K. B. Clark (2000). Design Rules Volume 1: The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, Massachuesetts, USA, MIT Press.
3. Banville, C. and M. Landry (1989). "Can the Field of MIS Be Disciplined?" Communications of the ACM 32(1): 48-60.
4. Barney, J. B. (1991). "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage." Journal of Management 17: 99-120.
5. Benbasat, I. and H. Barki (2007). "Quo Vadis, TAM?" Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(4): 211-218.
6. Benbasat, I. and R. W. Zmud (2003). "The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties." MIS Quarterly 27(2): 183-194.
7. Burrell, G. and G. Morgan (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. London, England, Heinemann.
8. Codd, E. F. (1970). "A Relational Database Model For Large Shared Data Banks." Communications of the ACM 13(6): 377-387.
9. Culnan, M. J. (1986). "The intellectual development of management information systems, 1972-1982: a cocitation analysis." Manage. Sci. 32(2): 156-172.
10. Culnan, M. J. (1987). "Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS, 1980-1985: a co-citation analysis." MIS Q. 11(3): 341-353.
11. Davis, F. D. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information Systems: Theory and Results (Doctoral Dissertation). Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
12. Davis, F. D. (1989). "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology." MIS Quarterly 13(3).
13. Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, et al. (1989). "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models." Management Science 35(8): 982-1003.
14. De Lone, W. H. and E. R. McLean (1992). "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable." Information Systems Research 3(1): 60-95.
15. De Lone, W. H. and E. R. McLean (2003). "The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update." Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4): 9-30.
16. De Mey, M. (1982). The Cognitive Paradigm. Boston, D. Reidel.
17. De Sanctis, G. and M. S. Poole (1994). "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory." Organizational Science 5(2): 121-147.
18. DeLone, W. H. and E. R. McLean (1992). "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable." Information Systems Research 3(1): 60-95.
19. Dubin, R. (1978). Theory Building (revised edition). New York, The Free Press.
20. Ein-dor, P. and E. Segev (1981). A Paradigm for Management Information Systems. New York, Praeger.
21. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). "Building Theories from Case Study Research." The Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532-550.
22. Farhoomand, A. F. (1987). "Scientific Progress of Management Information Systems." DATA BASE.
23. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Massachusetts, USA, Addison-Wesley.
24. Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker (1981). "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error." Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39-50.
25. Galliers, R. D. (1985). In Search of a Paradigm for Information Systems Research. Research Methods in Information Systems. E. M. e. al. New York, North-Holland: 281-297.
26. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge, Polity.
27. Glass, R. L., V. Ramesh, et al. (2004). "An Analysis of Research in Computing Disciplines." Communications of the ACM 47(6): 89-94.
28. Goodhue, D. L. and R. L. Thompson (1995). "Task-technology fit and individual performance." MIS Quarterly 19(2): 213-236.
29. Gregor, S. (2006). "The Nature of Theory in Information Systems." MIS Quarterly 30 (3): 611-642.
30. Grover, V., R. Ayyagari, et al. (2006). "A Citation Analysis of the Evolution and State of Information Systems within a Constellation of Reference Disciplines." Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7(5): 270-325.
31. Hamilton, S. and B. Ives (1982). "Knowledge utilization among MIS researchers." MIS Quarterly 6(4): 61-74.
32. Hevner, A. R., S. T. March, et al. (2004). "Design Science in Information Systems Research." MIS Quarterly 28(1): 75-105.
33. Keen, P. G. W. (1991). Relevance and Rigour in Information Systems Research: Improving Quality, Confidence, Cohesion and Impact. Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. H.-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein and R. Hirschheim, Elsevier Science Publishers (North Holland).
34. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Route to Normal Science. The Structure Of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, USA, University of Chicago Press.
35. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure Of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, USA, University of Chicago Press.
36. Larsen, K. R., D. E. Monarchi, et al. (2008). "Analyzing unstructured text data: Using latent categorization to identify intellectual communities in information systems." Decision Support Systems 45 884-896.
37. Lee, Y., K. A. Kozar, et al. (2003). "The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future." Communications of the AIS 12(50): 752-780.
38. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York, Free Press.
39. Nonaka, I. (1994). "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation." Organizational Science 5(1): 14-37.
40. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company. New York, Oxford University Press.
41. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric Theory. New York, USA, McGraw Hill.
42. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York, USA, McGraw Hill.
43. Nunnally, J. C. and I. Bernstein (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd Edition). New York, USA, McGraw Hill.
44. Orlikowski, W. J. and C. S. Iacono (2001). "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact." Information Systems Research 12(2): 121-134.
45. Popper, K. R. (1963). Science as Falsification. Conjectures and Refutations. London, Routledge and Keagan Paul: 30-39.
46. Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. New York, Free Press.
47. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. New York, Free Press.
48. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York, Free Press.
49. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York, Free Press.
50. Rogers, E. M. and F. F. Shoemaker (1971). Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach (2nd edition of Diffusion of Innovations, Rogers, 1962). New York, Free Press.
51. Sagan, C. (1997). The Fine Art of Baloney Detection. The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. New York, Random House.
52. Saunders, C., D. Avison, et al. (2007). "Senior Scholars' Basket of Journals " Association of Information Systems (AISNET)(http://home.aisnet. org/associations/7499/files/Senior%20Scholars%20Letter.pdf).
53. Seddon, P. B. (1997). "A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS Success." Information Systems Research 8(3): 240-253.
54. Straub, D. W. and A. Burton-Jones (2007). "Veni, Vidi, Vici: Breaking the TAM Logjam." Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(4): 223-229.
55. Taylor, S. and P. A. Todd (1995). "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models." Information Systems Research 6(2): 144-176.
56. Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, et al. (2003). "User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view." MIS Quarterly 27(3): 425-478.
57. Walstrom, K. A. and L. Leonard (2000). "Citation classics from the information systems literature." Information and Management 38 (2): 59-72.
58. Wand, Y. and R. A. Weber (1990). "An Ontological Model of an Information System." IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 16(11): 1282-1292.
59. Weber, R. A. (1987). "Toward a Theory of Artifacts: A Paradigmatic Base for Information Systems Research." Journal of Information Systems 1(2).
60. Weber, R. A. (1997). Ontological Foundations Of Information Systems (Coopers And Lybrand Accounting Research Methodology Monograph No. 4). Melbourne, Australia, Coopers And Lybrand.
61. Weber, R. A. (2003). "The Problem of the Problem (Editor's Comments)." MIS Quarterly 27(1): iii-ix.
62. Weber, R. A. (2003). "Still Desperately Seeking the IT Artifact (Editor's Comments)." MIS Quarterly 27(2): iiixi.
63. Weber, R. A. (2003). "Theoretically Speaking (Editor's Comments)." MIS Quarterly 27(3): iii-xii.
64. Whitley, E. A. and R. D. Galliers (2007). "An alternative perspective on citation classics: Evidence from the first 10 years of the European Conference on Information Systems." Information & Management 44(5): 441-455.
65. Yin, R. K. (1984). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, California, USA, Sage Publications.
66. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California, USA, Sage Publications.
67. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California, USA, Sage Publications.