Feedback as scaffolding: Senior examiner monitoring processes and their effects on examiner marking

Research in Post-Compulsory Education

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 391-407

  Johnson, Martin ^a   Black, Beth ^a  

^a University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

assessment; examiners; feedback; marking quality assurance; technology; Vygotsky

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870532207     PISSN: 13596748     EISSN: 17475112     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13596748.2012.738965     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Alloway, T.P. 2006. How does working memory work in the classroom?. Educational Research & Reviews, 1(4): 134-139.
2. Bakhtin, M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
3. Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J. and Glaser, R. 1981. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2): 121-152.
4. Conole, G. and Dyke, M. 2004. What are the affordances of information and communication technologies?. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 12(2): 113-124.
5. Dreyfus, H.L. and Dreyfus, S.E. 1986. Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the age of the computer, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
6. Festinger, L. and Katz, D., eds. 1953. Research methods in the behavioral sciences, New York: Dryden Press.
7. Fuller, A. and Unwin, L. 2004. "Expansive learning environments: Integrating organizational and personal development". In Workplace learning in context, Edited by: Rainbird, H., Fuller, A. and Munro, A. 126-44. London: Routledge.
8. Fuller, A. and Unwin, L. 2006. "Expansive and restrictive learning environments". In Improving workplace learning, Edited by: Evans, K., Hodkinson, P., Rainbird, H. and Unwin, L. 27-48. London: Routledge.
9. Gallimore, R. and Tharp, R. 1990. "Teaching mind in society: Teaching, schooling and literate discourse". In Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and social applications of sociohistorical psychology, Edited by: Moll, L.C. 175-205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Gass, S.M. and Mackey, A. 2000. Stimulated recall methodology in second language research, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Hutchins, E. 1995. How a cockpit remembers its speed. Cognitive Science, 19(3): 265-288.
12. Johnson, M., Hopkin, R. and Shiell, H. 2012. Marking extended essays on screen: Exploring the link between marking processes and comprehension. E-Learning and Digital Media, 9(1): 50-68.
13. Johnson, M. and Nádas, R. 2009. Marginalised behaviour: Digital annotations, spatial encoding and the implications for reading comprehension. Learning, Media & Technology, 34(4): 323-336.
14. SPSS Inc. 2006. SPSS for Windows, Version 15.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
15. TechSmith. 2011. Usability testing for software and websites, Okemos, MI: TechSmith Corp.
16. VERBI Software. 1989-2010. MAXQDA software for qualitative data analysis. Berlin-Marburg-Amöneburg: Sozialforschung GmbH.
17. Vygotsky, L.S. 1963. Genesis of the higher mental functions. In Child development in social context 2. Learning to think, ed. P. Light, S. Sheldon, and M. Woodhead, 32-41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.