Conducting an efficient proactive risk assessment prior to CPOE implementation in an intensive care unit

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 25-38

  Hundt, Ann Schoofs ^a   Adams, Jean A ^b   Schmid, J Andrew ^b   Musser, Linda M ^b   Walker, James M ^b   Wetterneck, Tosha B ^a,c   Douglas, Stephen V ^d   Paris, Bonnie L ^a,e   Carayon, Pascale ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^b GEISINGER HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d University of Wisconsin Health   (United States)

^e Quality Quest for Health   (United States)

Author keywords

CPOE; Electronic health records; Human factors engineering; Intensive care units; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

CPOE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; IT STAFF; LONG-TERM EVALUATION; NON-COMPLIANCE; ON-GOING MONITORING; PATIENT SAFETY; PRA METHODS; QUALITY OF CARE; REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS; TEAM MEMBERS; THREE PHASIS; USER TRAINING;

HUMAN ENGINEERING; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

INTENSIVE CARE UNITS;

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTERIZED PROVIDER ORDER ENTRY; DISTRESS SYNDROME; DOCUMENTATION; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MEDICAL STAFF; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROACTIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; STUDY DESIGN; TEAMWORK; TRAINING; VERBALIZATION; WORKFLOW;

EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MEDICAL ERRORS; MEDICAL ORDER ENTRY SYSTEMS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84870524404     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ash J.S., Berg M., Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J. Am. Inform. Assoc. 2004, 11(2):104-112.
2. Ash J.S., Sittig D.F., Dykstra R.H., Guappone K.P., Carpenter J.D., Seshadri V. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2007, 76(Suppl.):S21-S27.
3. Koppel R., Metlay J.P., Cohen A., Abaluck B., Localio A.R., Kimmel S.E., et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2005, 293(10):1197-1203.
4. Horsky J., Kuperman G.J., Patel V. Comprehensive analysis of a medication dosing error related to CPOE. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005, 12(4):377-382.
5. Carayon P., Schoofs-Hundt A., Karsh B.-T., Gurses A.P., Alvarado C.J., Smith M., et al. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2006, 15:50-58.
6. Israelski E.W., Muto W.H. Human factors risk management in medical products. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care and Patient Safety 2007, 615-647. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. P. Carayon (Ed.).
7. Handbook of Human Factors in Health Care and Patient Safety 2007, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. P. Carayon (Ed.).
8. Lyons M. Towards a framework to select techniques for error prediction: supporting novice users in the healthcare sector. Appl. Ergon. 2009, 40(3):379-395.
9. Carayon P., Faye H., Hundt A.S., Karsh B.-T., Wetterneck T.B. Patient safety and proactive risk assessment. Handbook of Healthcare Delivery Systems 2010, Taylor & Francis. Y. Yuehwern (Ed.).
10. Nagpal K., Vats A., Ahmed K., Smith A.B., Sevdalis N., Jonannsson H., et al. A systematic quantitative assessment of risks associated with poor communication in surgical care. Arch. Surg. 2010, 145(6):582-588.
11. Pearse R.M., Dana E.C., Lanigan C.J., Pook J.A. Organisational failures in urgent and emergency surgery - a potential peri-operative risk factor. Anaesthesia 2001, 56(7):684-689.
12. Friesdorf W., Gross-Alltag F., Konichezky S., Schwilk B., Fattroth A., Fett P. Lessons learned while building an integrated ICU workstation. Int. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 1994, 11(2):89-97.
13. Abraham J., Reddy M. Challenges to inter-departmental coordination of patient transfers: a workflow perspective. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2010, 79:112-122.
14. Wetterneck T.B., Skibinski K.A., Roberts T.L., Kleppin S.M., Schroeder M.E., Enloe M., et al. Using failure mode and effects analysis to plan implementation of smart i.v. pump technology. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2006, 63(16):1528-1538.
15. Faye H., Rivera-Rodriguez A.J., Karsh B.T., Hundt A.S., CBaker C., Carayon P. Involving intensive care unit nurses in a proactive risk assessment of the medication management process. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 2010, 36(8):376-384.
16. Bonnabry P., Despont-Gros C., Grauser D., Casez P., Despond M., Pugin D., et al. A risk analysis method to evaluate the impact of a computerized provider order entry system on patient safety. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2008, 15(4):453-460.
17. Schroeder M.E., Wolman R.L., Wetterneck T.B., Carayon P. Tubing misload allows free flow event with Smart intravenous infusion pump. Anesthesiology 2006, 105(2):434-435.
18. Requirements for prospective risk analysis in health care. Healthcare Systems Ergonomics and Patient Safety 2008 2008, M.M.P. Habraken, T.W. Van der schaaf (Eds.).
19. Challenges with the performance of failure mode and effects analysis in healthcare organizations: an IV medication administration HFMEATM. Annual Conference of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2004, The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, New Orleans, LA. T.B. Wetterneck, K. Skibinski, M. Schroeder, T.L. Roberts, P. Carayon (Eds.).
20. Wetterneck T.B., Hundt A.S., Carayon P. FMEA team performance in health care: a qualitative analysis of team member perceptions. J. Patient Saf. 2009, 5(2):102-108.
21. Ashley L., Armitage G., Neary M., Hollingsworth G. A practical guide to failure mode and effects analysis in health care: making the most of the team and its meetings. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 2010, 36(8):351-358.
22. Implementing an Electronic Health Record System 2005, Springer-Verlag, London. J.M. Walker, E.J. Bieber, F. Richards (Eds.).
23. Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. Res. Nurs. Health 1995, 18(2):179-182.
24. Weick K.E., Sutcliffe K.M. Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity 2001, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
25. Kessels-Habraken M., Van der Schaaf T., De Jonge J., Rutte C. Defining near misses: towards a sharpened definition based on empirical data about error handling processes. Soc. Sci. Med. 2010, 70(9):1301-1308.
26. Karsh B.-T. Beyond usability: designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004, 13(5):388-394.
27. Computational Technology for Effective Health Care 2009, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. W.W. Stead, H.S. Lin (Eds.).
28. Davis S., Riley W., Gurses A.P., Miller K., Hansen H. Failure modes and effects analysis based on in situ simulations: a methodology to improve understanding of risks and failures. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches 2008, AN gency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. K. Henriksen, J.B. Battles, M.A. Keyes (Eds.).