Fracture Strength and Failure Mode of Maxillary Implant-Supported Provisional Single Crowns: A Comparison of Composite Resin Crowns Fabricated Directly Over PEEK Abutments and Solid Titanium Abutments

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 882-889

  Santing, Hendrik Jacob ^a   Meijer, Henny J A ^a   Raghoebar, Gerry M ^a   Özcan, Mutlu ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Composite resin; Dental; Failure type; Fracture strength; Implant supported; Provisional

Indexed keywords

KETONE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; POLYETHERETHERKETONE; RESIN; SOLIDEX; TITANIUM;

BONE SCREW; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTAL RESTORATION; HUMAN; MAXILLA; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SINGLE TOOTH IMPLANT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BONE SCREWS; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; KETONES; MAXILLA; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84870499284     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00322.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andersson B, Odman P, Lindvall AM, Lithner B. Single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated implants: results and experiences from a prospective study after 2 to 3 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10:702-711.
2. Avivi-Arber L, Zarb GA. Clinical effectiveness of implant-supported single-tooth replacement: the Toronto study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11:311-321.
3. den Hartog L, Huddelston Slater JJ, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Treatment outcome of immediate, early and conventional single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a systematic review to survival, bone level, soft-tissue, aesthetics and patient satisfaction. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35:1073-1086.
4. Wheeler SL. Implant complications in the esthetic zone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65:93-102.
5. Priest G. Developing optimal tissue profiles with implant-level provisional restorations. Dent Today 2005; 24:96-100.
6. Romanos GE. Surgical and prosthetic concepts for predictable immediate loading of oral implants. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004; 32:991-1001.
7. Meijer HJ, Stellingsma K, Meijndert L, Raghoebar GM. A new index for rating aesthetics of implant-supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues: the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16:645-649.
8. Block M, Finger I, Castellon P, Lirettle D. Single tooth immediate provisional restoration of dental implants: technique and early results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62:1131-1138.
9. Castellon P, Casadaban M, Block MS. Techniques to facilitate provisionalization of implant restorations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63:72-79.
10. Ganddini MR, Tallents RH, Ercoli C, Ganddini R. Technique for fabricating a cement-retained single-unit implant-supported provisional restoration in the esthetic zone. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94:296-298.
11. Kokat AM, Akca K. Fabrication of a screw-retained fixed provisional prosthesis supported by dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91:293-297.
12. Mijiritsky E. Plastic temporary abutments with provisional restorations in immediate loading procedures: a clinical report. Implant Dent 2006; 15:236-240.
13. Moy PK, Parminter PE. Chairside preparation of provisional restorations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63:80-88.
14. Penarrocha M, Lamas J, Penarrocha M, Garcia B. Immediate maxillary lateral incisor implants with nonocclusal loading provisional crowns. J Prosthodontics 2008; 17:55-59.
15. Shor A, Schuler R, Goto Y. Indirect implant-supported fixed provisional restoration in the esthetic zone: fabrication technique and treatment workflow. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008; 20:82-95.
16. Kiliaridis S, Kjellberg H, Wenneberg B, Engstrom C. The relationship between maximal bite force, bite force endurance, and facial morphology during growth. A cross-sectional study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51:323-331.
17. Haraldson T, Carlsson GE, Ingervall B. Functional state, bite force and postural muscle activity in patients with osseointegrated oral implant bridges. Acta Odontol Scand 1979; 37:195-206.
18. Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, Scharer P. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:285-290.
19. Tetelman ED, Babbush CA. A new transitional abutment for immediate aesthetics and function. Implant Dent 2008; 17:51-58.
20. McCool JI, Boberick KG, Baran GR. Lifetime predictions for resin-based composites using cyclic and dynamic fatigue. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 58:247-253.
21. Att W, Kurun S, Gerds T, Strub JR. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95:111-116.
22. Yildirim M, Fischer H, Marx R, Edelhoff D. In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90:325-331.
23. Özcan M, Niedermeier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15:299-302.
24. Özcan M, Alander P, Vallittu PK, Huysmans MC, Kalk W. Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005; 16:21-27.
25. Özcan M, van der Sleen JM, Kurunmaki H, Vallittu PK. Comparison of repair methods for ceramic-fused-to-metal crowns. J Prosthodont 2006; 15:283-288.