Characterisation of surface properties of chemical and plasma treated regenerated cellulose fabric

Textile Research Journal

Volumn 82, Issue 20, 2012, Pages 2078-2089

  Peršin, Zdenka ^a,b   Vesel, Alenka ^a   Kleinschek, Karin Stana ^a,b   Mozetič, Miran ^c  

^a Centre of Excellence for Polymer Materials and Technologies   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARIBOR   (Slovenia)

^c JO EF STEFAN INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

chemical pre treatment; contact angle; hydrophilicity; Owens Wendt surface energy; oxygen plasma; polarity; Regenerated cellulose fabric; surface chemical composition

Indexed keywords

ALKALINITY; CELLULOSE; CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CONTACT ANGLE; HYDROPHILICITY; INTERFACIAL ENERGY; OXYGEN; PLASMA APPLICATIONS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

CHEMICAL PRE-TREATMENT; OXYGEN PLASMAS; POLARITY; REGENERATED CELLULOSE; SURFACE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION;

SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTION;

EID: 84870471667     PISSN: 00405175     EISSN: 17467748     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0040517512445338     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Cauto E, Tan H, Demarquette N, et al. Oxygen plasma treatment of sisal fibres and polypropylene: Effects on mechanical properties of composites. Polym Eng Sci 2002; 40: 790–797.
2. Prabaharan M, Carneiro N. Effect of low-temperature plasma on cotton fabric and its application to bleaching and dyeing. Indian J Fibre Text 2005; 30: 68–75.
3. Behnisch J. Plasma chemical modification of natural polymers. In: d’AgostinoR,FaviaP,FracassiF,(eds). Plasma processing of Polymers, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997; 345–363.
4. Freytag R, Donze JJ. Alkaline treatment of cellulose fibres. In: LewinM,SelloSB,(eds). Chemical processing of Fibres and Fabrics – Fundamentals and Preparation, Part A, New York and Basel: Marcel Deckker, Inc, 1983; 93–157.
5. Verschuren J, Van Herzele P, De Clerck K, et al. Influence of fibre surface purity on wicking properties of needle-punched nonwoven after oxygen plasma treatment. Textile Res J 2005; 75: 437–442.
6. Sivagurunathan S, Brack N, Kelly J, et al. Ion implantation of wool. In: Proceedings ‘Ion Beam Modifications of Materials' conference. Canberra: Australian National University, 1995, p.4.
7. Sissko Johansson L, Campbell J, Koljonen K, et al. On surface distribution in natural cellulosic fibres. Surf Interface Anal 2004; 36: 706–710.
8. Titov VA, Rybkin VV, Shikova TG, et al. Study on the application possibilities of an atmospheric pressure glow discharge with liquid electrolyte cathode for the modification of polymer materials. Surf Coat Tech 2005; 199: 231–236.
9. Choi HS, Rybkin VV, Titov VA, et al. Comparative actions of low pressure oxygen plasma and an atmospheric pressure glow discharge on the surface modification of polypropylene. Surf Coat Technol 2006; 200: 4479–4488.
10. Van der Wielen A, Ragauskas AJ. Fibre modification via dielectric-barrier discharge theory and practical applications to lignocellulosic fibres. In: EdwardsJV,Buschle-DillerG,GoheenSS,(eds). Modified Fibres with Medical and Specialty Applications, The Netherlands: Publisher Springer, 2006; 215–220.
11. Canal C, Erra P, Molina R, et al. Regulation of surface hydrophilicity of plasma treated wool fabrics. Textile Res J 2007; 77: 559–565.
12. Maver U, Žnidaršič A, Gaberšček M. An attempt to use atomic force microscopy for determination of bond type in lithium battery electrodes. J Mater Chem 2011; 21: 4071–4075.
13. Maver T, Stana-Kleinschek K, Peršin Z, et al. Functionalization of AFM tips for use in force spectroscopy between polymers and model surfaces. Adv Mat Res 2011; 45: 205–211.
14. Butt HJ, Cappella B, Kappl M. Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: technique, interpretation and applications. Surf Sci Rep 2005; 59: 1–152.
15. Ontiveros-Ortega A, Espinosa-Jimenez M, Chibowski E. Effect of tannic acid on the surface free energy of cotton fabric dyed with a cationic dye. J Colloid Interf Sci 1998; 202: 189–194.
16. Cerne L, Simoncic B. Influence of repellent finishing on the surface free energy of cellulosic textile substrates. Textile Res J 2004; 74: 426–432.
17. Peršin Z, Stana-Kleinschek K, Sfiligoj-Smole M, et al. Determining the surface free energy of cellulose materials with the powder contact angle method. Textile Res J 2004; 74: 55–62.
18. Simoncic B, Cerne L, Tomsic B, et al. Surface properties of cellulose modified by imidazolidinone. Cellulose 2008; 15: 47–58.
19. Fowkes FM. Determination of interfacial tensions, contact angles, and dispersion forces in surfaces by assuming additivity of intermolecular interactions in surfaces. J Phys Chem 1962; 66: 382–382.
20. Fowkes FM. Attractive forces at interfaces. Ind Eng Chem 1964; 56: 40–52.
21. Zisman WA. Relation of the equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution. In: FowkesFM,(ed.) Contact angle, wettability and adhesion, Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1964; 1–51.
22. Kwok DY, Neumann AW. Contact angle measurement and contact angle interpretation. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 1999; 81: 167–249.
23. Rabel W. Flüssigkeitsgrenzflächen in Theorie und Anwendungstechnik. Physikalische Blätter 1977; 33: 151–161.
24. Kaelble DH. Peel adhesion: Influence of surface energies and adhesive rheology. J Adhesion 1969; 1: 102–123.
25. Kaelble DH. Physical chemistry of adhesion, New York: Wiley Interscience, 1972; 25–25.
26. Owens DK, Wendt RC. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 1969; 13: 1741–1747.
27. van Oss CJ, Chaudhury MK, Good RJ. Additive and nonadditive surface tension components and the interpretation of contact angles. Langmuir 1988; 4: 884–891.
28. van Oss CJ, Chaudhury MK, Good RJ. The role of van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds in ‘hydrophobic interactions' between biopolymers and low energy surfaces. J Colloid Interf Sci 1986; 111: 378–390.
29. van Oss CJ. Acid-base interfacial interactions in aqueous media. Colloid Surface A 1993; 78: 1–49.
30. Good RJ, Girifalco LA. A theory for estimation of surface and interfacial energies, III: Estimation of surface energies of solids from contact angle data. J Phys Chem 1960; 64: 561–565.
31. Jakobasch HJ, Grundke K, Mäder E, et al. Application of the surface free energy concept in polymer processing. In: MittalKL,(ed.) Contact angle, wettability & adhesion, The Netherlands: Zeist VSP BV, 2003; 921–936.
32. Shaw DJ. Introduction to colloid and surface chemistry. Liverpool: College of Technology, Reed Educational and professional Publishing Ltd., 1996, p.151.
33. Fras-Zemljič L, Peršin Z, Stenius P. Improvement of chitosan adsorption onto cellulosic fabrics by plasma treatment. Biomacromolecules 2009; 10: 1181–1187.
34. Beamson G, Briggs D. High resolution XPS of organic polymers – The Scienta ESCA300 Database, Chichester: Wiley, 1992.
35. Sfiligoj–Smole M, Peršin Z, Kreze T, et al. X-ray study of pre-treated regenerated cellulose fibre. Mater Res Innov 2003; 7: 275–282.
36. Bellon-Fontaine MN, Mozes N, van der Mei HC, et al. A comparison of thermodynamic approaches to predict the adhesion of dairy micro-organisms to solid substrata. Cell Biophys 1990; 17: 93–106.
37. Della Volpe C, Siboni S. Some reflections on acid–base solid surface free energy theories. J Colloid Interf Sci 1997; 195: 121–136.
38. Koerner G, Rossmy G, Sänger G. Oberflächen und Grenzflächen. Goldschmidt-Hauszeitschrift 1974; 29: 2–41.
39. Gebhardt KF. Grundlagen der physikalischen Chemie von Grenzflächen und Methoden zur Bestimmung grenzflächenenergeticscher Großen. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer-Institut für Grenzflüchentechnik IGB, 1982.
40. Fras Zemljič L, Peršin Z, Stenius P, et al. Carboxyl groups in pre-treated regenerated cellulose fibres. Cellulose (Lond.) 2008; 15: 681–690.
41. Vesel A, Junkar I, Cvelbar U, et al. Surface modification of polyester by oxygen and nitrogen plasma treatment. Surf Interface Anal 2008; 40: 1444–1453.
42. Rowland SP, Wade CP, Bertoniere NR. Pore structure analysis of purified, sodium hydroxide-treated and liquid ammonia-treated cotton cellulose. J Appl Polym Sci 1984; 29: 3349–3357.
43. Junkar I, Cvelbar U, Vesel A, et al. The role of crystallinity on polymer interaction with oxygen plasma. Plasma Processes Polym 2009; 6: 667–675.