Biological assets reporting: Is the increase in value caused by the biological transformation revenue?

Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic)

Volumn 58, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 520-532

  Bohušová, Hana ^a   Svoboda, Patrik ^a   Nerudová, Danuše ^a  

^a MENDEL UNIVERSITY IN BRNO   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Agricultural produce; Biological assets; Biological transformation; IFRS; Revenue

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870444111     PISSN: 0139570X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17221/187/2011-agricecon     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Amen M. (2000): Comment Letter on Exposure Draft E65 - Agriculture No. 13. [online]. Available at http://media.ifrs.org/CommentsE65.zip (accessed 5.12. 2011).
2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (1996): Audits of Agricultural Producers and Agricultural Cooperatives. AICPA, New York.
3. Argilés J., Slof E. (2001): New opportunities for farm accounting. The European Accounting Review, 10: 361-383.
4. Aryanto Y.H. (2011): Theoretical Failure of IAS 41: Agriculture. (April 13, 2011) [online]. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1808413 (accessed 5.12. 2011).
5. Athanasios V., Stergios A., Laskaridou E.C. (2010): The importance of information through accounting practice in agricultural sector-European Data Network. Journal of Social Sciences, 6: 221-228.
6. Booth P., Walker R. (2003): Valuation of SGARAs in the wine industry: time for sober reflection. Australian Accounting Review, 13: 52-60.
7. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (1986): Comptabilité et Information. Financière des Producteurs Agricoles. CICA, Toronto.
8. CIMA (2000): Comment Letter on Exposure Draft E65 - Agriculture No. 39 [online]. Available at http://media.ifrs.org/CommentsE65.zip (accessed 5.12. 2011).
9. Danish Accounting standards Committee (2000): Comment Letter on Draft Statement of Principles: Agriculture. International Accounting Standards Committee, London [online]. Available at http://www.ifrs.org/Archive/Pages/Archive-IASB-Project-Comment-Letters.aspx
10. nd ed. Computer Press, Brno; ISBN 978-80-251-1950-1.
11. EC (2000): Comment Letter on Exposure Draft E65 - Agriculture No. 58 [online]. Available at http://media.ifrs.org/CommentsE65.zip
12. EC (2010): Evropská komise - politika rozvoje venkova 2007-2013 htm [online]. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev/index_cs (accessed 5.12. 2011).
13. Elad Ch. (2004): Fair value accounting in the agricultural sector: some implications for international account ing harmonization. European Accounting Review, 13: 621-641.
14. EU farm structure [online]. Available at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Farmstructure (accessed 5.12. 2011).
15. G100 (2000). Comment Letter on Exposure Draft E65 - Agriculture No. 61 [online]. Available at http://media.ifrs.org/CommentsE65.zip (accessed 5.12. 2011).
16. Herbohn K.F. (2006): Accounting for SGARAs: A stock take of practice before compliance with AASB 141 Agriculture. Australian Accounting Review, 16: 63-77.
17. Hoffman F., Schneider E., Dangerfield A. (2000): Comment Letter on Exposure Draft E65 - Agriculture No. 5 [online]. Available on http://media.ifrs.org/CommentsE65.zip
18. IASB Foundation Education (2008): A Guide Through International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) 2008: Including the Full Text of the Standards and Interpretations and Accompanying Documents Issued by the International Accounting Standards Board as Approved at 1 July 2008: with Extensive Cross-references and Other Annotations. International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation, London; ISBN 978-1-905590-68-1.
19. IASC (1998): Comment Letters on Draft Statement of Principles: Agriculture. International Accounting Standards Committee, London [online]. Available at http://www.ifrs.org/Archive/Pages/Archive-IASB-Project-Comment-Letters.aspx
20. IASC (2000): Comment Letters on Exposure Draft, E65: Agriculture. International Accounting Standards Committee, London [online]. Available at http://www.ifrs.org/Archive/Pages/Archive-IASB-Project-Comment-Letters.aspx
21. IASC (2001): International Accounting Standard IAS 41: Agriculture. International Accounting Standards Committee, London [online]. Available at http://www.ifrs.org/Archive/Pages/Archive-IASB-Project-Comment-Letters.aspx
22. ICAA (2001): Comment Letter on Draft Statement of Principles: Agriculture. International Accounting Standards Committee, London [online]. Available at http://www.ifrs.org/Archive/Pages/Archive-IASB-Project-Comment-Letters.aspx
23. IFAC (2000): Comment Letter on Draft Statement of Principles: Agriculture. International Accounting Standards Committee, London [online]. Available at http://www.ifrs.org/Archive/Pages/Archive-IASB-Project-Comment-Letters.aspx
24. Knechtle A., Attenslander J. (2000): Comment Letter on Exposure Draft E65 - Agriculture No. 7 [online]. Available at http://media.ifrs.org/CommentsE65.zip (accessed 5.12. 2011).
25. Lefter V., Roman A.G. (2007): IAS 41 Agriculture: Fair Value Accounting. Theoretical and applied Economics, 5: 15-22.
26. Nishikawa I. (2000): Comment Letter on Exposure Draft E65 - Agriculture No. 24. [online]. Available at http://media.ifrs.org/CommentsE65.zip (accessed 5.12. 2011).
27. Naumann K.P. (2000). Comment Letter on Exposure Draft E65 - Agriculture No. 28 [online]. Available at http://media.ifrs.org/CommentsE65.zip (accessed 5.12. 2011).
28. Nobes C. (2006): Survival of international differences under IFRS: towards a research agenda. Accounting and Business Research, 36: 233-245.
29. Sedláček J. (2010): The methods of valuation in agricultural accounting. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 56: 59-66.