Effect of conservative fluid management strategy on the outcomes in patients with acute lung injury: A Meta-analysis

National Medical Journal of China

Volumn 91, Issue 21, 2011, Pages 1471-1474

  Yang, Cong Shan ^a   Liu, Yun ^a   Lu, Xiao Min ^a   Liu, Song Qiao ^a   Guo, Feng Mei ^a   Yang, Yi ^a   Qiu, Hai Bo ^a  

^a SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Fluid therapy; Meta analysis; Prognosis; Respiratory distress syndrome, adult

Indexed keywords

ACUTE LUNG INJURY; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; FLUID THERAPY; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; FEMALE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACUTE LUNG INJURY; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; MALE; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84870430421     PISSN: 03762491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2011.21.009     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R. The influence of volume management on outcome. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2007, 13: 541-548.
2. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials, 1996, 17: 1-12.
3. Horwitz RI, Feinstein AR. Methodologic standards and contradictory results in case-control research. Am J Med, 1979, 66: 556-562.
4. Mitchell JP, Schuller D, Calandrino FS, et al. Improved outcome based on fluid management in critically ill patients requiring pulmonary artery catheterization. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1992, 145: 990-998.
5. Martin GS, Mangialardi RJ, Dupont WD, et al. Albumin and furosemide therapy in hypoproteinemic patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med, 2002, 30: 2175-2182.
6. Martin GS, Moss MM, Wheeler AP, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of furosemide with or without albumin in hypoproteinemic patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med, 2005, 33: 1681-1687.
7. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrom (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, et al. Comparion of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med, 2006, 354: 2564-2575.
8. Humphrey H, Hall J, Sznajder I, et al. Improved survival in ARDS patients associated with a reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Chest, 1990, 97: 1176-1180.
9. Murphy CV, Schramm GE, Doherty JA, et al. The importance of fluid management in acute lung injury secondary to septic shock. Chest, 2009, 136: 102-109.
10. Rosenberg AL, Dechert RE, Park PK, et al. Association of cumulative fluid balance on outcome in acute lung injury: a retrospective review of the ARDSnet tidal volume study cohort. J Intensive Care Med, 2009, 24: 35-46.
11. Sakr Y, Vincent JL, Reinhart K, et al. High tidal volume and positive fluid balance are associated with worse outcome in acute lung injury. Chest, 2005, 128: 3098-3108.
12. Rosenberg AL. Fluid management in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respir Care Clin, 2003, 9: 481-193.
13. Durairaj L, Schmidt GA. Fluid therapy in resuscitated sepsis: less is more. Chest, 2008, 133: 252-263.
14. Mangialardi RJ, Martin GS, Bernard GR, et al. Hypoproteinemia predicts acute respiratory distress syndrome development, weight gain, and death in patients with sepsis. Crit Care Med, 2000, 28: 3137-3145.
15. Bagshaw SM, Brophy PD, Cruz D, et al. Fluid balance as a biomarker: impact of fluid overload on outcome in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Critical Care, 2008, 12: 169-171.