Predicting the influence of emerging information and communication technologies on home life

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 184-200

  Cornacchia, Michele ^a   Baroncini, Vittorio ^a   Livi, Stefano ^b  

^a FONDAZIONE UGO BORDONI   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Acceptance; Assessment; Controlled environment; Ease of use; End users; Evaluation; Home control; Home networking; Home services; Integration of ICT; Intention of use; Interoperability; Laboratory home platform; Laboratory trial; Perceived usefulness

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; INTEROPERABILITY; SURVEYS;

ACCEPTANCE; ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT; EASE-OF-USE; END USERS; EVALUATION; HOME NETWORKING; HOME SERVICES; INTENTION OF USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 84870425424     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-68262-2_14     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. ePerSpace No.IST-506775 Home Page, http://www.ist-eperspace.org/
2. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.:User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425-478 (2003)
3. Eason, K.: Information technology and organisational change. Taylor & Francis, Abington (1988)
4. Cornacchia, M.: Usability, a way to distinguish from the good, the bad, and the irrelevant in the web. In: Cost 269, Conference Proceedings, Media Centre Lume, University of Art and Design, Helsinki (Finland), pp. 159-163 (2003)
5. Malhotra, Y., Galletta, D.F.: Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Account for Social Influence: Theoretical Bases and Empirical Validation. In: Proceedings of the 32th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (IEEE 1999) (1999)
6. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46(2), 186-204 (2000)
7. Ajzen, I.: The directive influence of attitudes on behavior. In: Gollwitzer, P., Bargh, J.A. (eds.) Psychology of action, pp. 385-403. Guilford, New York (1996)
8. Bandura, A.: Social Foundation of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986)
9. Bagozzi, R.P., Davis, F.D.,Warshaw, P.R.: Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations 45(7), 660-686 (1992)
10. Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A., Huff, S.: Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: a Longitudinal Study. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 145-158 (1999)
11. Pierro, A., Mannetti, M., Livi, S.: Self-Identity and the Theory of Planned Behavior in the Prediction of Health Behavior and Leisure Activity. Self and Identity 2, 47-60 (2003)
12. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319-340 (1989)
13. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Prentice- Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs (1980)
14. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: Measuring User Acceptance of Emerging Technologies: An Assessment of PossibleMethod Biases. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (IEEE 1995) (1995)
15. SUMI: Software Usability Measurements Inventory (7.38). Human Factors Research Group, Cork, Ireland (1998)
16. Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., Livi, S.: Looking for a Simple Big Five Factorial Structure in the Domain of Adjectives. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 16(2), 87-97 (2000)