Impacts of inter-sectoral trade on carbon emissions-a case of China in 2007

Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering in China

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 387-402

  Fang, Xiuqi ^a   Wei, Benyong ^b   Wang, Yuan ^c  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY   (China)

^c TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

carbon emissions; China; input output analysis; international trade

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870390110     PISSN: 16737415     EISSN: 16737520     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11783-012-0396-9     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Machado G, Schaeffer R, Worrell E. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: an input-output approach. Ecological Economics, 2001, 39(3): 409-424.
2. Wyckoff A W, Roop J M. The embodiment of carbon in imports of manufactured products: implications for international agreements on greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy, 1994, 22(3): 187-194.
3. 2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environmental Science and Technology, 2008, 42(5): 1401-1407.
4. 2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(12): 5687-5692.
5. Tolmasquim M T, Machado G. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2003, 8(2): 139-155.
6. 2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility? Energy Policy, 2001, 29(4): 327-335.
7. Bastianoni S, Pulselli F M, Tiezzi E. The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics, 2004, 49(3): 253-257.
8. Lenzen M, Murray J, Sack F, Wiedmann T. Shared producer and consumer responsibility-theory and practice. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(1): 27-42.
9. Peters G P. From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(1): 13-23.
10. Peters G P, Hertwich E G. Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: production versus consumption. Climatic Change, 2008b, 86(1-2): 51-66.
11. National Bureau of Statistics. China Statistical Yearbook 2008. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2008 (in Chinese).
12. Pan J H, Phillips J, Chen Y. China's balance of emissions embodied in trade: approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2008, 24(2): 354-376.
13. Weber C L, Peters G P, Guan D B, Hubacek K. The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change. Energy Policy, 2008, 36(9): 3572-3577.
14. 2 emissions. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(1): 350-356.
15. Lin B Q, Sun C W. Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(1): 613-621.
16. 2 embodiment in US-China trade. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(18): 4063-4068.
17. Li Y, Hewitt C N. The effect of trade between China and the UK on national and global carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Policy, 2008, 36(6): 1907-1914.
18. Xu M, Allenby B, Chen WQ. Energy and air emissions embodied in China-US trade: eastbound assessment using adjusted bilateral trade data. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(9): 3378-3384.
19. Wei B Y, Fang X Q, Wang Y, Yang H M, Zhang D. Estimation of carbon emissions embodied in international trade for China: an input-output analysis. Journal of Beijing Normal University, 2009, 45(4): 413-419.
20. 2 emissions embodied in international trade: evidence for Spain. Energy Policy, 2004, 32(18): 1999-2005.
21. Ahmad N, Wyckoff A W. Carbon dioxide emissions embodied in international trade of goods. OECD Publications, 2003. http://www. oecd. org/sti/working-papers.
22. Wiedmann T, Lenzen M, Turner K, Barrett J. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities-Part 2: review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(1): 15-26.
23. Leontief W. Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1970, 52(3): 262-271.
24. Schaeffer R, Leal de Sá A. The embodiment of carbon associated with Brazilian imports and exports. Energy Conversion and Management, 1996, 37(6-8): 955-960.
25. Lenzen M. Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input-output analysis. Energy Policy, 1998, 26(6): 495-506.
26. Lenzen M. A generalized input-output multiplier calculus for Australia. Economic Systems Research, 2001, 13(1): 65-92.
27. Mongelli I, Tassielli G, Notarnicola B. Global warming agreements, international trade and energy/carbon embodiments: an input-output approach to the Italian case. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(1): 88-100.
28. Ackerman F, Ishikawa M, Suga M. The carbon content of Japan-US trade. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(9): 4455-4462.
29. 2 embodiment in international trade: an overview of emerging literatures. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2009, 3(1): 12-19.
30. Peters G P, Hertwich E G. Pollution embodied in trade: the Norwegian case. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(4): 379-387.
31. Herendeen R A, Bullard C W. US Energy Balance of Trade, 1963-1967. Energy Systems and Policy, 1976, 1(4): 383-390.
32. National Bureau of Statistics, National Accounts Division. Inputoutput Tables of China, 2007. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2009 (in Chinese).
33. Chen Y, Pan J H, Xie L H. Energy embodied in goods of international trade in China: calculation and policy implications. Economic Research Journal, 2008, 9(1): 11-25.
34. Research Team of China Climate Change Country Study. China Climate Change Country Study. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2000 (in Chinese).
35. US Energy Information Administration. International Energy Statistics. 2009, http://www. eia. doe. gov/.
36. 2 emissions embodied in trade: the effects of sector aggregation. Energy Economics, 2010, 32(1): 166-175.
37. Lenzen M. Errors in conventional and input-output-based lifecycle inventories. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2001, 4(4): 127-148.
38. 2 multipliers in multi-region input-output models. Economic Systems Research, 2004, 16(4): 391-412.