Who's more creative, experts or the crowd?

17th Americas Conference on Information Systems 2011, AMCIS 2011

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages 771-783

  Ren, Jie ^a  

^a STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Creativity; Information asymmetry; Web based crowdsourcing innovation

Indexed keywords

AMAZON'S MECHANICAL TURKS; CREATIVE IDEAS; CREATIVE THINKING; CREATIVITY; CROWDSOURCING; DEMAND INFORMATION; INFORMATION ASYMMETRY; PRODUCT INNOVATION;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INNOVATION;

INDUSTRY;

EID: 84870383994     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity; A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality andSocialPsychology, 45, 357-376.
2. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3. Baron and Kenny, (1986), The Moderator-Memator Vanable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal ofPersonality andSocialPsychology, 51, 6, 1173-1182
4. Bidault, F., and Cummings, T. (1994), Innovating Through Alliances: Expectations and Limitations, R&DManagement, 24,2, 33-45
5. Bmce, M., Levenck, F., Littler, D., and Wilson, D. (1995), Success Factors for Collaborative Product Development: A Study of Suppliers of Information and Communication Technology, R&D Management, 25, 1, 134-145
6. Bmsh, T. H. and Adz, K. W. (1999), Toward a contingent resource-based theory the impact of information asymmetq on the value of capabilities in vetennaq memcine, StrategicManagement Journal, 20, 3, 223-250.
7. Chan, T. and Lee, I., (2004), A comparative study of online user communities' involvement in product innovation and development. 13th International Conference on Management of Technology (IAMOT), Washngton D.C., Apnl 3-7.
8. Dean, Hender, Rodgers and Santanen, (2006), Identifyng Quality, Novel and Creative Ideas: Constmcts and Scales for Idea Evaluation, Journal of theAssociation for Information Systems, 7, 10, 646-699
9. Dolan, R, and Mathews, J. (1993), Maximizing the Utility of Customer Product Testing: Beta Test Design and Management, Journal ofProductInnovationManagement, 10,4,318-330
10. Gibbert, M. et al., (2002), Five Styles of Customer Knowledge Management, and How SmaJt Companies Use Them to Create Value, European Management Journal, 20,5,459-469
11. Howe, I., (2006), The %se of Crowdsourcing, WiredMagazine, 14, 1-5
12. Kittur, A. et al, (ZOOS), Crowdsourcing for Usability: Using Micro-Task Markets for Rapid, Remote, and Low-Cost User Measurements, Proceeding of CHI.
13. Klein, L. R. (1998), Evaluating the potential of interactive media through a new lens: search versus experience goods. Journal ofBusinessResearch, 41, 3, 195-203.
14. Mosteller, F. (1990). Research methodology: Strengthening causal interpretations of nonexperimentals data In: I Secherst, E. Perin, & I. Bunkers (Eds). Improving research methodo1ogy:An overview, 221-230.
15. Nambisan, S. and Baron, R. A, (2007) Interactions in ViItual Customer Environments: Implications for Product Support and Customer Relationshp Management, Journal ofinteractive Marketing, 21, 2, 42-62
16. Nelson, P. (1970), Information and consumer behavior, Journal ofPoliticalEconomy, 78,2,311-329.
17. Norman, R. and Ra, irez, R. (1993), From Value Chain to Value Constellation: Designing Interactive Strategy, Harvard BusinessReviav, 171, 4, 65-77
18. Ostrom, A. and Iacobucci, D. (1995), Consumer trade-offs and the evaluation of services, Journal of Marketing, 59, 1, 17-30.
19. Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, V (2000), Co-opting Customer Competence, HarvardBusinessReview, 78, 1, 79-87
20. Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, V (2002), The Co-Creation Connection, Strategy +Business, Second QuaJter, 27, 1-12
21. Ramirez, R. (1999), Value Co-production: Intellectual Origins and Implications for Practice and Research, Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1, 49-65
22. Schrader, S. and Gopfert, I. (1998), StuctuingM anufacturer-Supplier Interaction in New Product Development Teams: An Empirical Analysis, in Relationshps and Networks in International Markets, Hans George Gemunde, Thomas Ritter, and Achim Walter, Eds., Pergamon Press, Elsevier Science, Oxford
23. Taggar, S., (2002), Inmvidual Creativity and Group Ability to Utilize Individual Creative Resources: A Multilevel Mode1, Academy ofManagement Journal, 45 (2): 315-330
24. Thomke, Stefan and von Hippel, Eric. (2002), Customers as innovators: a new way to create value, Harvard business review, 80, 4, 74-81
25. Vriens, Marco, Loosschlder, Gerard H.; Rosbergen, Edward, and Wittink, Dick R. (1998). Verbal versus Realistic Pictorial Representations in Conjoint Analysis with Design Attributes. Journal ofProduct Innovation Management. 15, 455-467
26. von Hippel, Eric, (1986), Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts, Management Science, 32,7, 791-805
27. Thomke and von Hippel, (2002), Customers as Innovators: A New Way to Create Value, HarvardBusinessReview, 80, 4, 74-81.
28. von Hippel, E., (2002), Shtting Innovation to Users via Toolhts, Management Science, 48,7,821-833)
29. Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Mechanical_Turk
30. Winston A.S.(1990). How the psychological experiment was redefined. American Journal ofPsychology, 103, 391-401
31. Winston, A.S., and Blais, D l. (1996): What counts as an experiment? A trans-msciplinary analysis of textbooks, 1930-1970. American Journal ofPsychology. 109,599-616