메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 38, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 579-586

Three arguments against prescription requirements

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PRESCRIPTION DRUG;

EID: 84870357078     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100240     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (32)

References (29)
  • 1
    • 34250622864 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Facing up to paternalism in research ethics
    • Miller FG, Wertheimer A. Facing up to paternalism in research ethics. Hastings Cent Rep 2007;37:24-34.
    • (2007) Hastings Cent Rep , vol.37 , pp. 24-34
    • Miller, F.G.1    Wertheimer, A.2
  • 2
    • 84865994063 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
    • Carpenter D. Reputation and Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.
    • (2010) Reputation and Power
    • Carpenter, D.1
  • 3
    • 76249126233 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The legal development of the informed consent doctrine: past and present
    • Dolgin JL. The legal development of the informed consent doctrine: past and present. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2010;19:97.
    • (2010) Camb Q Healthc Ethics , vol.19 , pp. 97
    • Dolgin, J.L.1
  • 4
    • 84870326478 scopus 로고
    • Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees, 154 Cal.App.2d 560. Judicial opinion
    • Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees, 154 Cal.App.2d 560. Judicial opinion, 1957.
    • (1957)
  • 5
    • 84885565775 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Informed consent and patient autonomy
    • Kuhse H, Singer P, eds. Blackwell
    • Young R. Informed consent and patient autonomy. In: Kuhse H, Singer P, eds. A Companion to Bioethics. Blackwell, 2010:441-51.
    • (2010) A Companion to Bioethics , pp. 441-451
    • Young, R.1
  • 6
    • 0142074351 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ethics needs principlesdfour can encompass the restdand respect for autonomy should be first among equals
    • Gillon R. Ethics needs principlesdfour can encompass the restdand respect for autonomy should be "first among equals". J Med Ethics 2003;29:307-31.
    • (2003) J Med Ethics , vol.29 , pp. 307-331
    • Gillon, R.1
  • 7
    • 0030034463 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patient-Centered medicine: a professional Evolution
    • Laine C, Davidoff F. Patient-Centered medicine: a professional Evolution. JAMA 1996;275:152-6.
    • (1996) JAMA , vol.275 , pp. 152-156
    • Laine, C.1    Davidoff, F.2
  • 8
    • 0004001507 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Oxford University Press
    • Mill JS. On Liberty. Oxford University Press, 2008:83-104.
    • (2008) On Liberty , pp. 83-104
    • Mill, J.S.1
  • 9
    • 0029268229 scopus 로고
    • Abandoning informed consent
    • Veatch RM. Abandoning informed consent. Hastings Cent Rep 1995;25:5-12.
    • (1995) Hastings Cent Rep , vol.25 , pp. 5-12
    • Veatch, R.M.1
  • 14
    • 0142105986 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Methods and principles in biomedical ethics
    • Beauchamp TL. Methods and principles in biomedical ethics. J Med Ethics 2003;29:269-274.
    • (2003) J Med Ethics , vol.29 , pp. 269-274
    • Beauchamp, T.L.1
  • 15
    • 0027030660 scopus 로고
    • Against the right to die
    • Velleman JD. Against the right to die. J Med Philos 1992;17:665-81.
    • (1992) J Med Philos , vol.17 , pp. 665-681
    • Velleman, J.D.1
  • 16
    • 0032791784 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In defense of ignorance: genetic information and the right not to know
    • Laurie GT. In defense of ignorance: genetic information and the right not to know. Eur J Health Law 1999;6:119-32.
    • (1999) Eur J Health Law , vol.6 , pp. 119-132
    • Laurie, G.T.1
  • 17
    • 26944464299 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Precedent autonomy and subsequent consent
    • Davis JK. Precedent autonomy and subsequent consent. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 2004;7:267-91.
    • (2004) Ethical Theory Moral Pract , vol.7 , pp. 267-291
    • Davis, J.K.1
  • 18
    • 0023573107 scopus 로고
    • The health effects of mandatory prescriptions
    • Peltzman S. The health effects of mandatory prescriptions. J Law Econ 1987;30:207.
    • (1987) J Law Econ , vol.30 , pp. 207
    • Peltzman, S.1
  • 19
    • 84934453543 scopus 로고
    • Realized benefits from switching drugs
    • Temin P. Realized benefits from switching drugs. J Law Econ 1992;35:351-369.
    • (1992) J Law Econ , vol.35 , pp. 351-369
    • Temin, P.1
  • 20
    • 81355139593 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving the decision-making process for nonprescription drugs: a framework for benefiterisk assessment
    • Brass EP, Lofstedt R, Renn O. Improving the decision-making process for nonprescription drugs: a framework for benefiterisk assessment. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;90:791-803.
    • (2011) Clin Pharmacol Ther , vol.90 , pp. 791-803
    • Brass, E.P.1    Lofstedt, R.2    Renn, O.3
  • 22
    • 0002786237 scopus 로고
    • Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices
    • Read D, Loewenstein G. Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices. J Exp Psychol Appl 1995;1:34-49.
    • (1995) J Exp Psychol Appl , vol.1 , pp. 34-49
    • Read, D.1    Loewenstein, G.2
  • 24
    • 77950553920 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Contractual principle versus legislative fixes: coming to closure on the unending travails of medical malpractice
    • Epstein R. Contractual principle versus legislative fixes: coming to closure on the unending travails of medical malpractice. DePaul Law Review 2005;54:503.
    • (2005) DePaul Law Review , vol.54 , pp. 503
    • Epstein, R.1
  • 26
    • 84870370626 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Liberalism, inalienability, and rights of drug use
    • De Greiff P, ed. Cornell University Press
    • Freeman S. Liberalism, inalienability, and rights of drug use. In: De Greiff P, ed. Drugs and the Limits of Liberalism. Cornell University Press, 1999:110-30.
    • (1999) Drugs and the Limits of Liberalism , pp. 110-130
    • Freeman, S.1
  • 27
    • 84870373716 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Do we have a right to use drugs?
    • De Marneffe P. Do we have a right to use drugs? Publ Aff Q 1996;10:229-47.
    • (1996) Publ Aff Q , vol.10 , pp. 229-247
    • Marneffe, P.D.1
  • 28
    • 34547119466 scopus 로고
    • Recreational drugs and paternalism
    • Husak DN. Recreational drugs and paternalism. Law Philos 1989;8:353-81.
    • (1989) Law Philos , vol.8 , pp. 353-381
    • Husak, D.N.1
  • 29
    • 31544482392 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Addiction and autonomy: can addicted people consent to the prescription of their drug of addiction?
    • Foddy B, Savulescu J. Addiction and autonomy: can addicted people consent to the prescription of their drug of addiction? Bioethics 2006;20:1-15.
    • (2006) Bioethics , vol.20 , pp. 1-15
    • Foddy, B.1    Savulescu, J.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.