Immediate newborn outcome and mode of delivery: Use of standardized fetal heart rate pattern management

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 71-74

  Katsuragi, Shinji ^a   Ikeda, Tomoaki ^a   Noda, Shunichi ^b   Onishi, Junji ^c   Ikenoue, Tsuyomu ^c   Parer, Julian T ^d  

^a NATIONAL CEREBRAL AND CARDIOVASCULAR CENTER   (Japan)

^b Miyazaki Japan   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MIYAZAKI   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cesarean delivery; Fetal base excess; Fetal pH; Metabolic acidemia; Vacuum extraction delivery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS HEART RATE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; JAPAN; METABOLIC ACIDEMIA; METABOLIC DISORDER; PH; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RULE BASED SYSTEM; TRAINING; UMBILICAL ARTERY; VACUUM EXTRACTION;

ACIDOSIS; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; EDUCATION; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN;

EID: 84870354044     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2012.728645     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Workshop on the Guidelines for the Use of Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1987;25:159-167.
2. Liston R, Sawchuck D, Young D; Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada; British Columbia Perinatal Health Program. Fetal health surveillance: antepartum and intrapartum consensus guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007;29:S3-56.
3. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The use of electronic fetal monitoring. Evidence-based clinical guideline No. 8. RCOG Press; 2001.
4. Keith RD, Beckley S, Garibaldi JM, Westgate JA, Ifeachor EC, Greene KR. A multicenter comparative study of 17 experts and an intelligent computer system for managing labour using the cardiotocogram. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:489-490.
5. Parer JT, Ikeda T. A framework for standardized management of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:26. e1-26.e6.
6. Williams KP, Galerneau F. Intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns in the prediction of neonatal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:820-823. (Pubitemid 36332458)
7. Parer JT, King T, Flanders S, Fox M, Kilpatrick SJ. Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: is there evidence of an association? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;19:289-294. (Pubitemid 43879995)
8. Elliott C, Warrick PA, Graham E, Hamilton EF. Graded classification of fetal heart rate tracings: association with neonatal metabolic acidosis and neurologic morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:258.e1-258.e8.
9. Parer JT, Hamilton EF. Comparison of 5 experts and computer analysis in rule based fetal heart rate interpretation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:451.e1-451.e7.
10. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: Research guidelines for interpretation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1385-1390
11. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1997;26:635-640.
12. Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:661-666.
13. Kubli FW, Hon EH, Khazin AF, Takemura H. Observations on heart rate and pH in the human fetus during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969;104:1190-1206.
14. Chao A. Graphic mnemonic for variable decelerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:1098. (Pubitemid 20328808)
15. Helwig JT, Parer JT, Kilpatrick SJ, Laros RK Jr. Umbilical cord blood acid-base state: what is normal? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1807- 12; discussion 1812.