Web accessibility for visually impaired users: Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM)

Association for Information Systems - 12th Americas Conference On Information Systems, AMCIS 2006

Volumn 5, Issue , 2006, Pages 3017-3022

  Djamasbi, Soussan ^a   Tullis, Thomas ^b   Girouard, Matthew ^a   Hebner, Michael ^a   Krol, Jason ^a   Terranova, Michael ^a  

^a WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Fidelity Investments ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Information accessibility; Technology acceptance; Visual disability; Visually impaired users; Website accessibility

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; INFORMATION ACCESSIBILITY; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; VISUAL DISABILITY; VISUALLY-IMPAIRED USERS; WEBSITE ACCESSIBILITY;

HUMAN REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY;

WEBSITES;

EID: 84870354038     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Culnan, M. J. (1984) The Dimensions of Accessibility to Online Information: Implications for Implementing Office Information Systems, ACMTrans. on Office Information Systems, 2, 141-150.
2. Culnan, M. J. (1985) The Dimensions of Perceived Accessibility to Information: Implications for the Delivery of Information Systems and Services, Journal of the American Society of Information Sciences, 36, 302-308.
3. Davis, F. D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-339.
4. Davis, F. D. and Kottemann, J. E. (1995) Determinants of Decision Rule Use in a Production Planning Task, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 63, 145-157.
5. Elges, M. (2002) In Nonprofit World, Vol. 20, pp. 15-19.
6. Karahanna, E. and Limayem, M. (2000) E-Mail and V-Mail Usage: Generalizing Across Technologies, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 10, 49-66.
7. Karahanna, E. and Straub, D. W. (1999) The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, Information and Management, 35, 237-250.
8. Kerr, E. and Hiltz, S. R. (1982) Computer-Mediated Communications Systems, Academic, New York.
9. Loiacono, E. (2004) In Communications of the ACM, Vol. 47, pp. 83-87.
10. Loiacono, E. T. and McCoy, S. (2004) In Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 13, pp. 471-485.
11. Morris, M. G. and Dillon, A. (1997) How User Perceptions Influence Software Use, IEEE Software, 14, 58-64.
12. Resnikoff, S., Pascolini, D., Etya'ale, D., Kocur, I., Pararajasegaram, R. P. P. G. and Mariotti, S. P. (2004) Global Data on Visual Impairment in the year 2002, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82, 844-851.
13. Rice, R. E. and Shook, D. (1988) Access to, Usage of, and Outcomes from an Electronic Message System, ACM Trans. on Office Information Systems, 6, 255-276.
14. Szajna, B. (1996) Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model, Management Science, 42, 85-92.
15. Venkatesh, V. (1999) Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation, MIS Quarterly, 23, 239-260.
16. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000) A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, 46, 186-205.
17. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. and Davis, F. D. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.
18. West, S. and Sommer, A. (2001) Prevention of Blindness and Priorities for the Future, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79, 244-248.