Peer review versus citations - An analysis of best paper prizes

Research Policy

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 295-301

  Coupé, Tom ^a  

^a Kyiv School of Economics Ukraine   (Ukraine)

Author keywords

Academic quality; Citations; Peer review; Performance evaluation

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING;

CITATION COUNTS; CITATIONS; CITED PAPERS; EVALUATION METHODS; PEER REVIEW; PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84870349237     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. S. Beggs, S. Cardell, and J. Hausman Assessing the potential demand for electric cars Journal of Econometrics 17 1981 1 19
2. R. Blank The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: experimental evidence from the American economic review American Economic Review 81 1991 1041 1067
3. L. Bornmann Does the journal peer review select the best from the work submitted? The state of empirical research IETE Technical Review 27 2010 93 95
4. L. Bornmann Scientific peer review Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 45 2011 199 245
5. L. Bornmann, and H.-D. Daniel What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior Journal of Documentation 2008 45 80
6. L. Bornmann, W. Marx, H. Schier, E. Rahm, A. Thor, and H.-D. Daniel Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry - citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstract Journal of Informetrics 2009 27 35
7. I. Broder Professional achievements and gender differences among academic economists Economic Inquiry 1993 116 127
8. Z. Corbyn Hefce Backs Off Citations in Favour of Peer Review in REF 2009 Times Higher Education
9. K. Debackere, and W. Glänzel Using a bibliometric approach to support research policy making: the case of the Flemish BOF-key Scientometrics 2004 253 276 (Pubitemid 39109226)
10. G. Ellison Evolving standards for academic publishing: a Q-R theory Journal of Political Economy 2002 994 1034 (Pubitemid 35295026)
11. J. Gans, and G. Shepherd How the mighty have fallen: rejected classic articles by leading economists Journal of Economic Perspectives 1994 165 179
12. D. Hamermesh, and P. Schmidt The determinants of econometric society fellows elections Econometrica 2003 399 407
13. Mahdi, S.; D'Este, P.; Neely A.; 2008. Citation counts: are they good predictors of RAE scores? A bibliometric analysis of RAE 2001. AIM Cranfield School of Management Working paper.
14. M. Richardson The research excellence framework: revisiting the RAE 2011 Research trends March. http://www.researchtrends.com/issue22-march-2011/the- research-excellence-framework-revisiting-the-rae-2/read on 26/04/2012.
15. V. Smeets, F. Warzynski, and T. Coupé Does the academic labor market initially allocate new graduates efficiently? Journal of Economic Perspectives 2006 161 172
16. L. Waltman, N. van Eck, T. van Leeuwen, M. Visser, and A. van Raan Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis Scientometrics 2011 467 481