Paternal age and risk for cesarean delivery

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2713-2716

  Faro, Revital ^a   Santolaya Forgas, Joaquin ^a   Canterino, Joseph C ^a,b   Oyelese, Yinka ^a,b   Ananth, Cande V ^c  

^a ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b JERSEY SHORE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Columbia University Medical Center ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Advanced maternal age; Cesarean delivery; Paternal aging; Temporal trends

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; CESAREAN SECTION; CHILD DEATH; FEMALE; GESTATION PERIOD; HUMAN; LIVE BIRTH; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; PATERNAL AGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; MIDDLE AGED; PATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84870348745     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2012.703727     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Martin JA, et al., Births: final data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep, 2010;58:1-85.
2. Mitler LK, Rizzo JA, Horwitz SM. Physician gender and cesarean sections. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:1030-1035.
3. Goyert GL, Bottoms SF, Treadwell MC, Nehra PC. The physician factor in cesarean birth rates. N Engl J Med 1989;320:706-709. (Pubitemid 19072490)
4. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, Shah A, et al.; WHO 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health research group. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 2006;367:1819-1829. (Pubitemid 43833191)
5. Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, Souza JP, Taneepanichskul S, Ruyan P, Attygalle DE, et al.; World Health Organization Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet 2010;375:490-499.
6. MacDorman MF, Menacker F, Declercq E. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes. Clin Perinatol 2008;35:293- 307, v. (Pubitemid 351635812)
7. Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol 2006;30:235-241. (Pubitemid 44436576)
8. Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:29-38.
9. Lee HC, Gould JB, Boscardin WJ, El-Sayed YY, Blumenfeld YJ. Trends in cesarean delivery for twin births in the United States: 1995-2008. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:1095-1101.
10. Gossman GL, Joesch JM, Tanfer K. Trends in maternal request cesarean delivery from 1991 to 2004. Obstet Gynecol, 2006;108:1506-1516. (Pubitemid 44901028)
11. NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on cesarean delivery on maternal request. NIH Consens State Sci Statements, 2006;23:1-29
12. Demontis R, Pisu S, Pintor M, D'aloja E. Cesarean section without clinical indication versus vaginal delivery as a paradigmatic model in the discourse of medical setting decisions. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24:1470-1475.
13. Dursun P, Yanik FB, Zeyneloglu HB, Baser E, Kuscu E, Ayhan A. Why women request cesarean section without medical indication? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24:1133-1137.
14. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:1279-1295.
15. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol, 2006;108:235-237.
16. Yang YT, Mello MM, Subramanian SV, Studdert DM. Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section. Med Care 2009;47:234-242.
17. Zain HA, Wright JW, Parrish GE, Diehl SJ. Interpreting the fetal heart rate tracing. Effect of knowledge of neonatal outcome. J Reprod Med 1998;43:367-370. (Pubitemid 28196438)
18. Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:661-666.
19. Pettker CM, Thung SF, Norwitz ER, Buhimschi CS, Raab CA, Copel JA, Kuczynski E, et al. Impact of a comprehensive patient safety strategy on obstetric adverse events. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:492. e1-492.e8.
20. Sibai BM, Ross MG. Hypertension in gestational diabetes mellitus: pathophysiology and long-term consequences. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23:229-233.
21. Templeton A. Joseph Price oration. The multiple gestation epidemic: the role of the assisted reproductive technologies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:894-898. (Pubitemid 38561504)
22. Kontopoulos EV, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. The impact of route of delivery and presentation on twin neonatal and infant mortality: a population-based study in the USA, 1995-97. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;15:219-224. (Pubitemid 38686009)
23. Joseph KS, Allen AC, Dodds L, Turner LA, Scott H, Liston R. The perinatal effects of delayed childbearing. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:1410-1418. (Pubitemid 40734277)
24. Ananth CV, Wilcox AJ, Savitz DA, Bowes WA Jr, Luther ER. Effect of maternal age and parity on the risk of uteroplacental bleeding disorders in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:511-516. (Pubitemid 26326008)
25. Raymond EG, Cnattingius S, Kiely JL. Effects of maternal age, parity, and smoking on the risk of stillbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101:301-306. (Pubitemid 24195997)
26. Dulitzki M, Soriano D, Schiff E, Chetrit A, Mashiach S, Seidman DS. Effect of very advanced maternal age on pregnancy outcome and rate of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:935-939. (Pubitemid 28536106)
27. Jacobsson B, Ladfors L, Milsom I. Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:727-733. (Pubitemid 40458800)
28. Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, Saade GR, et al.; FASTER Consortium. Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:983-990. (Pubitemid 40571015)
29. ACOG committee opinion. Advanced paternal age: risks to the fetus. Number 189, October 1997. Committee on Genetics. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 1997;59:271-272.
30. Tang CH, Wu MP, Liu JT, Lin HC, Hsu CC. Delayed parenthood and the risk of cesarean delivery-is paternal age an independent risk factor? Birth 2006;33:18-26.
31. Taffel SM, Ventura SJ, Gay GA. Revised U.S. certificate of birth-new opportunities for research on birth outcome. Birth 1989;16:188-193.
32. Kinzler WL, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. Parental age difference and adverse perinatal outcomes in the United States. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002;16:320-327. (Pubitemid 35429353)
33. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol, 2010;116:450-463.