Identifying green IT leaders with financial and environmental performance indicators

16th Americas Conference on Information Systems 2010, AMCIS 2010

Volumn 4, Issue , 2010, Pages 2484-2492

  Kim, Yong Seog ^a   Ko, Myung ^b  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Accounting information system; Data mining; Decision tree; Environmental performance; Green IT; Meta classifier

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; FINANCIAL RESOURCES; GREEN IT; KEY VARIABLES; LITERATURE REVIEWS; META-CLASSIFIERS; OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCIES; PREDICTION MODEL; RISK-TAKING TENDENCY;

BENCHMARKING; DATA MINING; DECISION TREES; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

FINANCE;

EID: 84870345180     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bansal, P. and Roth, K. (2000) Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 717-736.
2. Breiman, L. (1996) Bagging predictors, Machine Learning, 24(2): 123-140.
3. Buysse, K. and Verbeke, A. (2003) Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective, Strategic Management Journal, 24(5): 453-470.
4. Clark, D. (1999) What drives companies to seek ISO 14000 certification? Pollution Engineering Summer: 14-18.
5. Elliot, S. (2007) Environmentally sustainable ICT: A critical topic for IS research, PACIS 2007 Conference Proceedings.
6. Freeman, R. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
7. Freund, Y. and Schapire, R. (1996) Experiments with a new boosting algorithm, Proceedings of the 13th Int'l Conf. on Machine Learning, 148-156.
8. Henriques, I. and Sadorsky, P. (1999) The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance, Academy of Management Journal, 42(1): 87-99.
9. Klassen, R. and McLaughlin, C. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199-1214.
10. Lankoski, L. (2008) Corporate responsibility activities and economic performance: A theory of why and how they are connected, Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 536-547.
11. Li, M. and Ye, L. (1999) Information technology and firm performance: Linking with environmental, strategic and managerial contexts, Information and Management, 35(1): 3-51.
12. Murugesan, S. (2008) Harnessing Green IT: Principles and practices, IT Professional, 10(1): 24-33.
13. Newsweek (2009) Green Rankings 2009: Methodology, September 16, 2009, accessed February 10 at http://www.newsweek.com/id/215522.
14. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F., and Rynes, S. (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
15. Paulraj, A. (2009) Environmental motivations: a classification scheme and its impact on environmental strategies and practices, Business Strategy and the Environment, 18: 453-468.
16. Wade, M. and Hulland, J. (2004) Review: The resource-based view and Information Systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research, MIS Quarterly, 23(1): 107-142.
17. Russo, M. and Fouts, P. (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability, Academy of Management Journal, 40(3): 534-559.