Enterprise Microblogging: Procrastination or productive use?

16th Americas Conference on Information Systems 2010, AMCIS 2010

Volumn 6, Issue , 2010, Pages 4199-4207

  Riemer, Kai ^a   Richter, Alexander ^b   Seltsikas, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b Deutsche Bundeswehr   (Germany)

Author keywords

Enterprise Microblogging; Group Work; Microblogging; Social Media; Twitter

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION PRACTICES; CORPORATE CONTEXTS; CORPORATE MANAGERS; GENRE ANALYSIS; GENRE REPERTOIRES; GROUP WORK; MICROBLOGGING; RESEARCH ANALYSIS; SOCIAL MEDIA; TWITTER;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

INDUSTRY;

EID: 84870340554     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Askehave, I. and Swales, J. M. (2001) Genre identification and communicative purpose: a problem and a possible solution, Applied Linguistics, 22, 2, 195-212.
2. Barnes, S. J. and Böhringer, M. (2009) Continuance Usage Intention in Microblogging Services: The Case of Twitter, Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems, Verona.
3. Cetina, K. K. (2009) What is a Pipe? Obama and the Sociological Imagination, Theory, Culture & Society, 26, 5, 129-140.
4. Duperrin, B. (2009) 7 web 2.0 words to use cautiously with real managers, retrieved 11/2/2010, from http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/11/25/7-web-2-0-words-to-use-cautiously-with-real-managers.
5. Fahmi, W. S. (2009) Bloggers' street movement and the right to the city. (Re)claiming Cairo's real and virtual "spaces of freedom, " Environment and Urbanization, 21, 89-107
6. Galer-Unti, R. (2009) Guerilla Advocacy: Using Aggressive Marketing Techniques for Health Policy Change, Health Promotion Practice, 10, 325-327.
7. Hoewner, J. (2009) 30 Enterprise Microblogging-Tools, retrieved 11/2/2010, from http://www.moderneunternehmenskommunikation. de/wordpress/tipps/tools/30-enterprise-microblogging-tools.
8. Howlett, J. (2009): Enterprise 2.0: what a crock. Retrieved 11.2.2010, from http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howlett/?p=1228.
9. Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M., & Wu, F. (2009). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope, First Monday, 14.
10. Jansen, B., Zhang, M., Sobel, K. and Chowdury, A. (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 11.
11. Kwasnik, B. H. and Crowston, K. (2005) Introduction to special issue: Genres of digital documents., Information Technology & People, 18, 2, 76-88.
12. Krishnamurthy, B., Gill, P. and Arlitt, M. (2008) A few chirps about twitter, Proceedings of the first work-shop on Online social networks, New York, ACM, 19-24.
13. Marchionda, M. (2009) Afraid of using social media internally? Retrieved 11/2/2010, from http://www.prescientdigital.com/articles/web-2.0/afraid-of-using-social-media-internally.
14. McAfee, A. (2009) Enterprise 2.0: New Collaborative Tools for Your Organization's Toughest Challenges, Boston, Mcgraw-Hill Professional.
15. Naaman, M., Boase, J. and Lai, C.-H. (2010) Is it Really About Me? Message Content in Social Awareness Streams. Proceedings Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2010, Savanah, ACM.
16. Orlikowski, W. J. and Yates, Y. (1994) Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly 39, 541-574.
17. Riemer, K. & Haines, R. (2008) Pools and Streams: A Theory of Dynamic, Practice-Based Awareness Creation in Mediated-Communication, Proceedings of JAIS Theory Development Workshop. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 8, 12, http://sprouts.aisnet.org/8-12.
18. Riemer, K. & Taing, S. (2009) Unified Communications, Business & Information Systems Engineering (BISE), 1, 4, 326-330.
19. Riemer, K., Steinfield, C. & Vogel, D. (2009) eCollaboration: On the nature and emergence of communication and collaboration technologies, Electronic Markets, 19, 1, 181-188.
20. Swales, J. M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings, Cambridge et al.