Injectable preformed scaffolds with shape-memory properties

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 48, 2012, Pages 19590-19595

  Bencherif, Sidi A ^a,b   Sands, R Warren ^a   Bhatta, Deen ^a   Arany, Praveen ^a,b   Verbeke, Catia S ^a   Edwards, David A ^a,b   Mooney, David J ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell therapy; Controlled delivery; Cryogelation; Shape retention; Syringe injectable hydrogels

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOLUMINESCENCE; CELL SURVIVAL; CELL TRANSPLANTATION; CELL VIABILITY; CRYOGEL; FEMALE; GELATION; GREEN CHEMISTRY; IN VIVO STUDY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHAPE MEMORY PROPERTY; SYRINGE NEEDLE; VOLUMETRY;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CRYOGELS; FEMALE; HYDROGELS; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84870309160     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1211516109     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Dellatore SM, Garcia AS, Miller WM (2008) Mimicking stem cell niches to increase stem cell expansion. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19(5):534-540.
2. Hubbell JA(1995) Biomaterials in tissue engineering. Biotechnology (N Y) 13(6):565-576.
3. Burdick JA, Prestwich GD (2011) Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Mater 23(12):H41-H56.
4. Kretlow JD, Klouda L, Mikos AG (2007) Injectable matrices and scaffolds for drug delivery in tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59(4-5):263-273.
5. Bencherif SA, et al. (2008) Influence of the degree of methacrylation on hyaluronic acid hydrogels properties. Biomaterials 29(12):1739-1749.
6. Bencherif SA, et al. (2009) End-group effects on the properties of PEG-co-PGA hydrogels. Acta Biomater 5(6):1872-1883.
7. Kim BS, Mooney DJ (1998) Development of biocompatible synthetic extracellular matrices for tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 16(5):224-230.
8. Mooney DJ, Baldwin DF, Suh NP, Vacanti JP, Langer R (1996) Novel approach to fabricate porous sponges of poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) without the use of organic solvents. Biomaterials 17(14):1417-1422.
9. Mikos AG, et al. (1993) Preparation of poly(glycolic acid) bonded fiber structures for cell attachment and transplantation. J Biomed Mater Res 27(2):183-189.
10. Bennett DJ, Burford RP, Davis TP, Tilley HJ (1995) Synthesis of porous hydrogel structures by polymerizing the continuous phase of a microemulsion. Polym Int 36(3):219-226.
11. Nam YS, Park TG (1999) Biodegradable polymeric microcellular foams by modified thermally induced phase separation method. Biomaterials 20(19):1783-1790.
12. O'Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, Gibson LJ (2005) The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials 26(4):433-441.
13. Mikos AG, et al. (1994) Preparation and characterization of poly(L-lactic acid) foams for cell transplantation. Polymer (Guildf) 35(5):1068-1077.
14. MikosAG, SarakinosG, Leite SM, Vacanti JP, Langer R (1993) Laminated three-dimensional biodegradable foams for use in tissue engineering. Biomaterials 14(5):323-330.
15. Thornton AJ, Alsberg E, Hill EE, Mooney DJ (2004) Shape retaining injectable hydrogels for minimally invasive bulking. J Urol 172(2):763-768.
16. Plieva FM, Galaev IY, Noppe W, Mattiasson B (2008) Cryogel applications in microbiology. Trends Microbiol 16(11):543-551.
17. Lozinsky VI, et al. (2003) Polymeric cryogels as promising materials of biotechnological interest. Trends Biotechnol 21(10):445-451.
18. Hwang Y, Zhang C, Varghese S (2010) Poly(ethylene glycol) cryogels as potential cell scaffolds: Effect of polymerization conditions on cryogel microstructure and properties. J Mater Chem 20(2):345-351.
19. Kathuria N, TripathiA, Kar KK, Kumar A (2009) Synthesis and characterization of elastic and macroporous chitosan-gelatin cryogels for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 5(1):406-418.
20. Bölgen N, et al. (2009) Tissue responses to novel tissue engineering biodegradable cryogel scaffolds: An animal model. J Biomed Mater Res A 91(1):60-68.
21. Bölgen N, et al. (2008) Three-dimensional ingrowth of bone cells within biodegradable cryogel scaffolds in bioreactors at different regimes. Tissue Eng PartA 14(10):1743-1750.
22. Christman KL, et al. (2004) Injectable fibrin scaffold improves cell transplant survival, reduces infarct expansion, and induces neovasculature formation in ischemic myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol 44(3):654-660.
23. Yao J, Tao SL, Young MJ (2011) Synthetic polymer scaffolds for stem cell transplantation in retinal tissue engineering. Polymers 3(2):899-914.
24. Yu L, Ding J (2008) Injectable hydrogels as unique biomedical materials. Chem Soc Rev 37(8):1473-1481.
25. Jeong B, Kim SW, Bae YH (2002) Thermosensitive sol-gel reversible hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54(1):37-51.
26. Ruel-Gariépy E, Leroux JC (2004) In situ-forming hydrogels - review of temperature-sensitive systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 58(2):409-426.
27. Guvendiren M, Lu HD, Burdick JA (2012) Shear-thinning hydrogels for biomedical applications. Soft Matter 8(2):260-272.
28. Silva EA, Mooney DJ (2007) Spatiotemporal control of vascular endothelial growth factor delivery from injectable hydrogels enhances angiogenesis. J Thromb Haemost 5(3):590-598.
29. Augst AD, Kong HJ, Mooney DJ (2006) Alginate hydrogels as biomaterials. Macromol Biosci 6(8):623-633.
30. Leor J, Amsalem Y, Cohen S (2005) Cells, scaffolds, and molecules for myocardial tissue engineering. Pharmacol Ther 105(2):151-163.
31. Halberstadt C, et al. (2002) A hydrogel material for plastic and reconstructive applications injected into the subcutaneous space of a sheep. Tissue Eng 8(2):309-319.
32. Cooke MJ, Vulic K, Shoichet MS (2010) Design of biomaterials to enhance stem cell survival when transplanted into the damaged central nervous system. Soft Matter 6(20):4988-4998.
33. Straley KS, Heilshorn SC (2009) Independent tuning of multiple biomaterial properties using protein engineering. Soft Matter 5(1):114-124.
34. Huebsch N, et al. (2010) Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nat Mater 9(6):518-526.