Strategies for integrated modeling: The community surface dynamics modeling system example

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 39, Issue , 2013, Pages 314-321

  Overeem, Irina ^a   Berlin, Maureen M ^a   Syvitski, James P M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Community modeling; Earth surface dynamics; Governance; Model integration

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS; CYBER INFRASTRUCTURES; DECISION MAKERS; EARTH SURFACE; EARTH SURFACE PROCESS; FEDERAL AGENCY; GOVERNANCE; INTEGRATED MODELING; INTEGRATED SOFTWARE; MODEL INTEGRATION; MODELING SYSTEMS; NOVICE USER; OIL AND GAS COMPANIES; SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION; SEDIMENTARY BASIN; SELF EFFICACY; SURFACE DYNAMICS; TECHNICAL TOOLS; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; USER DATA; USER TYPE; WEB LOG ANALYSIS;

GAS INDUSTRY; METADATA; PUBLIC UTILITIES;

DYNAMICS;

DECISION MAKING; DOCUMENTARY SOURCE; EARTH SCIENCE; FLUID FLOW; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; METADATA; NUMERICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SEDIMENTARY BASIN; SURFACE STRUCTURE; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84870293449     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Armstrong R., Gannon D., Geist A., et al. Toward a common component architecture for high-performance scientific computing. Proceedings of the 8th Intl. Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing 1999, 115-124.
2. Dahlgren T., Epperly T., Kumfert G., Leek J. Babel User's Guide 2007, 2007 edition, Center for Applied Scientific Computing, U.S. Dept. of Energy and University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 269 pp.
3. Edwards, P. N., S. J. Jackson, G. C. Bowker, C. P. Knobel, 2007. Understanding Infrastructure: Dynamics, Tensions, and Design. Report of a Workshop on " History & Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures." 55 p.
4. Hutton E.W.H., Syvitski J.P.M., Peckham S.D. Producing CSDMS-compliant morphodynamic code to share with the RCEM community. River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics RCEM 2009 2010, 959-962. Taylor & Francis Group, London, 978-0-415-55426-CRC Press. Vionnet (Ed.).
5. Kumfert G., Bernholdt D.E., Epperly T. How the common component architecture advances computational science. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2006, 46:479-493.
6. Olson G.M., Olson J.S. Distance matters. Human Computer Interaction 2000, 15:139-179.
7. Peckham, S. P., Hutton, E., Norris, B. A component-based approach to integrated modeling in the geosciences: the design of CSDMS. Computers & Geosciences, submitted for publication.
8. Slingerland, R, Syvitski, J.P.M. Community approach to modeling earth- and seascapes. Treatise on Geomorphology, in press.
9. Syvitski J.P.M. CSDMS: Community Surface Dynamics Modeling System, Five-Year Strategic Plan 2008, and the CSDMS Community, University of Colorado Press, Boulder CO, 48 pp.
10. Syvitski J.P.M., Slingerland R.L., Burgess P., Meiburg E., Murray A.B., Wiberg P., Tucker G., Voinov A.A. Morphodynamic models: an overview. River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics: RCEM 2009 2010, 3-20. Taylor & Francis Group, London, CRC Press. Vionnet (Ed.).
11. Voinov A.A., DeLuca C., Hood R., Peckham S., Sherwood C., Syvitski J.P.M. A community approach to earth systems modeling. EOS Transactions of the AGU 2010, 91(13):117-124.