Prediction of coexistent carcinomas risks by subjective EIN diagnosis and comparison with WHO classification in endometrial hyperplasias

Pathology Research and Practice

Volumn 208, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 708-712

  Yang, Yu Feng ^a   Liao, Ying Yang ^b   Peng, Ning Fu ^c   Li, Le Qun ^c   Xie, Shu Rui ^a   Wang, Run Bang ^a  

^a Shilong People's Hospital   (China)

^b Department of Surgery   (China)

^c GUANGXI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Coexistent carcinomas; Endometrial carcinoma; Endometrial hyperplasia; Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; CANCER RISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ENDOMETRIAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; ENDOMETRIUM BIOPSY; ENDOMETRIUM CARCINOMA; ENDOMETRIUM HYPERPLASIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; HYSTERECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CELL NUCLEUS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS, MULTIPLE PRIMARY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 84870291798     PISSN: 03440338     EISSN: 16180631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2012.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Skov B.G., Broholm H., Engel U., Franzmann M.B., Nielsen A.L., Lauritzen A.F., et al. Comparison of the reproducibility of the WHO classifications of 1975 and 1994 of endometrial hyperplasia. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 1997, 16:33-37.
2. Kendall B.S., Ronnett B.M., Isacson C., Cho K.R., Hedrick L., Diener-West M., et al. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and well differentiated carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1998, 22:1012-1019.
3. Bergeron C., Nogales F.F., Masseroli M., Abeler V., Duvillard P., Müller-Holzner E., et al. A multicentric European study testing the reproducibility of the WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia with a proposal of a simplified working classification for biopsy and curettage specimens. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1999, 23:1102-1108.
4. Mutter G.L., Baak J.P.A., Crum C.P., Richart R.M., Ferenczy A., Faquin W.C., et al. Endometrial precancer diagnosis by histopathology, clonal analysis, and computerized morphometry. J. Pathol. 2000, 190:462-469.
5. Hecht J.L., Ince T.A., Baak J.P.A., Baker H.E., Ogden M.W., Mutter G.L. Prediction of endometrial carcinoma by subjective EIN diagnosis. Mod. Pathol. 2005, 18:324-330.
6. Baak J.P.A., Mutter G.L. EIN and WHO94. J. Clin. Pathol. 2005, 58:1-6.
7. Mutter G.L., The Endometrial Collaborative Group Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN): will it bring order to chaos?. Gynecol. Oncol. 2000, 76:287-290.
8. Izadi-Mood N., Yarmohammadi M., Ahmadi S.A., Irvanloo G., Haeri H., Meysamie A.P., et al. Reproducibility determination of WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia/well differentiated adenocarcinoma and comparison with computerized morphometric data in curettage specimens in Iran. Diagn. Pathol. 2009, 4:10.
9. Salman M.C., Usubutun A., Boynukalin K., Yuce K. Comparison of WHO and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classifications in predicting the presence of coexistent malignancy in endometrial hyperplasia. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2010, 21:97-101.
10. Baak J.P., Mutter G.L., Robboy S., van Diest P.J., Uyterlinde A.M., et al. In endometrial hyperplasias, the molecular-genetics and morphometry-based EIN classification more accurately predicts cancer-progression than the WHO94. Cancer 2005, 103:2304-2312.
11. Silverberg S.G., Kurman R.J., Nogales F., Mutter G.L., Kubik-Huch R.A., Tavassoli F.A. Epithelial tumors and related lesions of endometrium. Tumors of the Breast and Female Genital Organs 2003, 221-232. IARC Press, Lyon. F.A. Tavassoli, M.R. Stratton (Eds.).
12. G.L. Mutter. http://www.endometrium.org/.
13. Allison K.H., Reed S.D., Voigt L.F., Jordan C.D., Newton K.M., Garcia R.L. Diagnosing endometrial hyperplasia: why is it so difficult to agree?. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2008, 32:691-698.
14. Zaino R.J., Kauderer J., Trimble C.L., Silverberg S.G., Curtin J.P., Lim P.C., et al. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a gynecologic oncology group study. Cancer 2006, 106:804-811.
15. McKenney J.K., Longacre T.A. Low-grade endometrial adenocarcinoma. A diagnostic algorithm for distinguishing atypical endometrial hyperplasia and other benign (and malignant) mimics. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2009, 16:1-22.
16. Mutter G.L., Zaino R.J., Baak J.P.A., Bentley R., Robboy S. Benign endometrial hyperplasia sequence and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2007, 26:103-114.
17. Mutter G.L. Diagnosis of premalignant endometrial disease. J. Clin. Pathol. 2002, 55:326-331.
18. Ronnett R., Kurman R. Precursor lesions of endometrial carcinoma. Blaustein's Pathology of the Female Genital Tract 2000, 467-500. Springer-Verlag, New York. 5th ed. R. Kurman (Ed.).
19. Baak J.P., Orbo A., van Diest P.J., Jiwa M., de Bruin P., Broeckaert M., et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the morphometric D-score for prediction of the outcome of endometrial hyperplasias. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2001, 25:930-935.
20. Huang E.C., Mutter G.L., Crum C.P., Nucci M.R. Clinical outcome in diagnostically ambiguous foci of 'gland crowding' in the endometrium. Mod. Pathol. 2010, 23:1486-1491.
21. Pavlakis K., Messini L., Vrekoussis T., Panoskaltsis T., Chrissanthakis D., Yiannou P., et al. PTEN-loss and nuclear atypia of EIN in endometrial biopsies can predict the existence of a concurrent endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol. 2010, 119:516-519.
22. Gusberg S.B., Kaplan A.L. Precursors of corpus cancer IV. Adenomatous hyperplasia as Stage 0 carcinoma of the endometrium. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1963, 87:662-678.
23. Tavassoli F., Kraus F.T. Endometrial lesions in uteri resected for atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1978, 70:770-779.
24. Kurman R.J., Norris H.J. Evaluation of criteria for distinguishing atypical endometrial hyperplasia from well-differentiated carcinoma. Cancer 1982, 49:2547-2559.
25. Janicek M.F., Rosenshein N.B. Invasive endometrial cancer in uteri resected for atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Gynecol. Oncol. 1994, 52:373-378.
26. Dunton C.J., Baak J.P., Palazzo J.P., van Diest P.J., McHugh M., Widra E.A. Use of computerized morphometric analysis of endometrial hyperplasias in the prediction of coexistent cancer. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996, 174:1518-1521.