A monte carlo investigation of partial least squares, with implications for both structural and measurement models

14th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2008

Volumn 6, Issue , 2008, Pages 4083-4096

  Aguirre Urreta, Miguel I ^a   Marakas, George M ^a   Ellis, Michael E ^a   Sun, Wenying Nan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Measurement models; Monte carlo simulation; Parameter bias; Partial least squares; Statistical power

Indexed keywords

MEASUREMENT MODEL; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; PARAMETER BIAS; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE (PLS); STATISTICAL POWER;

ESTIMATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; RESEARCH;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84870279257     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Anderson, J., and Gerbing, D. (1988) Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103, 3, 411-423.
2. Chin, W. (1998) The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling, in Modern Methods for Business Research, G. Marcoulides (ed.) Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Chin, W., Marcolin, B., and Newsted, P. (2003) A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion / Adoption Study, Information Systems Research, 14, 2, 189-217.
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
5. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. (1981) Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382-388.
6. Gefen, D., and Straub, D. (2005) A Practical Guide to Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and Annotated Example, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 91-109.
7. Gefen, D., Straub, D., and Boudreau, M-C. (2000) Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 1-77.
8. Goodhue, D., Lewis, W., and Thompson, R. (2006) PLS, Small Sample Size, and Statistical Power in MIS Research, in Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauii, Hawaii.
9. Goodhue, D., Lewis, W., and Thompson, R. (2007) Statistical Power in Analyzing Interaction Effects: Questioning the Advantage of PLS with Product Indicators, Information Systems Research, 18, 2, 211-227.
10. Hui, B., and Wold, H. (1982) Consistency and Consistency at Large of Partial Least Squares Estimates, in Systems Under Indirect Observation - Part II, K. Jöreskorg and H. Wold (eds.), North-Holland Publishing, New York, NY.
11. Jöreskorg, K., and Wold, H. (1982) The ML and PLS Techniques for Modeling with Latent Variables, in Systems Under Indirect Observation - Part I, K. Jöreskorg and H. Wold (eds.), North-Holland Publishing, New York, NY.
12. Lohmöller, J. (1989) Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares, Physica-Verlag Heidelberg, Berlin.
13. Marcoulides, G., and Saunders, C. (2006) Editor's Comments - PLS: A Silver Bullet?, MIS Quarterly, 30, 2, iii-ix.
14. McDonald, R. (1996) Path Analysis with Composite Variables, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 2, 239-270.
15. Muthén, L., and Muthén, B. (1998-2004) Mplus User's Guide (3rd. ed), Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA.
16. Straub, D., Boudreau, M-C., and Gefen, D. (2004) Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 380-427.
17. Wold, H. (1982) Soft Modeling - The Basic Design and Some Extensions, in Systems Under Indirect Observation - Part II, K. Jöreskorg and H. Wold (eds.), North-Holland Publishing, New York, NY.