Trade and environment under WTO rules after the Appellate Body report in Brazil-retreated tyres

Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 42-49

  Thomas, Sébastien ^a  

^a College of Europe in Brugges ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870273700     PISSN: 19018401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Biermann, F. & Bohm, R. (2005). Implementing the Kyoto Protocol without the USA: the strategic role of energy tax adjustments at the border. Climate Policy 4 (2005), 289-302.
2. Birnie, P. & Boyle, A. (2001), International Trade Law: Theory and Practice (2nd ed.), Oxford university Press. New York.
3. Goh, G. (2004). The World Trade Organization, Kyoto and Energy Tax Adjustments at the Border. Journal Of World Trade 38(3), 395-423.
4. Howse, R. (2002). The Appellate Body Rulings in the Shrimp/Turtle case: A New Legal Baseline for the Trade and Environment Debate. 27 Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 491.
5. Majocchi, A. & Missaglia M. (2002), Environmental taxes and Border Tax Adjustments-An Economic Assessment. Third Annual Conference on Environmental Taxation, Woodstock, Vermont, USA, Friday, April 12-Saturday, April13 2002.
6. Matsushita, M., Schoenbaum, T. & Mavroidis, P.C. (2006). The World Trade Organization, Law, Practice and Policy. Oxford university Press.
7. Neumann, J. & Türk, E. (2003) Necessity Revisited: Proportionality in World Trade Organization Law after Korea-Beef, EC-Asbestos and EC-Sardines. Journal of World Trade 37(1) (2003), 199-233.
8. Weiss, J. & Jackson, J.H. (2001). Reconciling Environment and Trade. Transnational Publishers. New York.
9. WTO Committee on Trade and Environment (1997). Taxes and charges for environmental purposes-border tax adjustment. WT/CTE/W/47, 2 May 1997.