Intraoperative findings and procedures in culturally and geographically different patient and surgeon populations: An anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction registry comparison between Norway and the USA

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 83, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 577-582

  Granan, Lars Petter ^a,b,c   Inacio, Maria C S ^d   Maletis, Gregory B ^d   Funahashi, Tadashi T ^d   Engebretsen, Lars ^a,b,c  

^a OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF SPORT SCIENCES   (Norway)

^d Kaiser Permanente ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALLOGRAFT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KAISER PERMANENTE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION REGISTRY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NORWEGIAN KNEE LIGAMENT REGISTRY; REGISTER; REOPERATION; SURGEON;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GEOGRAPHY; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; KNEE INJURIES; MALE; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; NORWAY; REGISTRIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84870260602     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2012.741451     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Bloom S. Registries in chronic disease: Coming your way soon? Registries- problems, solutions and the future. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011; 50 (1): 4-5.
2. Carey J L, Dunn W R, Dahm D L, Zeger S L, Spindler K P. A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2009; 91 (9): 242-50.
3. Drogset J O, Grontvedt T, Tegnander A. Endoscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts fixed with bioabsorbable or metal interference screws: A prospective randomized study of the clinical outcome. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (8): 1160-5. (Pubitemid 41045188)
4. Granan L P, Bahr R, Steindal K, Furnes O, Engebretsen L. Development of a national cruciate ligament surgery registry: The Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (2): 308-15.
5. Kaeding C C, Aros B, Pedroza A, Pifel E, Amendola A, Andrish J T, et al. Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction predictors of failure from a MOON prospective longitudinal cohort. Sports Health: A multidisciplinary approach. Sports Health 2011; 3 (1): 73-81.
6. Maletis G B, Granan L P, Inacio M C, Funahashi T T, Engebretsen L. Comparison of community-based ACL reconstruction registries in the U.S. and Norway. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) (SUPPL3) 2011; 93: 31-6.
7. McNeil J J, Evans S M, Johnson N P, Cameron P A. Clinical-quality registries: Their role in quality improvement. Med J Aust 2010; 192 (5): 244-5.
8. Pallis M, Svoboda S J, Cameron K L, Owens B D. Survival comparison of allograft and autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the United States military academy. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (6): 242-6.
9. Paxton E W, Namba R S, Maletis G B, Khatod M, Yue E J, Davies M, et al. A prospective study of 80,000 total joint and 5000 anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in a community-based registry in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) (SUPPL2) 2010; 92: 117-32.
10. Paxton E W, Inacio M C S, Kiley M L. The Kaiser permanente implant registries: Effect on patient safety, quality improvement, cost effectiveness, and research opportunities. Perm J 2012; 16 (2) (2): 33-40.
11. Røtterud J H, Risberg M A, Engebretsen L, Aroen A. Patients with focal full-thickness cartilage lesions benefit less from ACL reconstruction at 2-5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (8): 1533-9.