Effect of inoculum to substrate ratio (I/S) on municipal solid waste anaerobic degradation kinetics and potential

Waste Management

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2258-2265

  Boulanger, Anthony ^a,b   Pinet, Elisabeth ^a   Bouix, Marielle ^c   Bouchez, Théodore ^a   Mansour, Alicia A ^b  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b Veolia Environnement Recherche et Innovation   (France)

^c AGROPARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

app; ARISA; Dissolved organic carbon; Inoculum; Mesophilic conditions; Reconstituted municipal solid waste

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC CONDITIONS; ANAEROBIC DEGRADATION; ARISA; DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON; FIRST ORDER KINETICS; I/S RATIO; INOCULUM; INOCULUM TO SUBSTRATE RATIOS; MAXIMAL RATES; MESOPHILIC; MESOPHILIC CONDITION; METHANE PRODUCTION; SLUDGE DIGESTERS;

DEGRADATION; METHANE; STREAM FLOW;

MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE;

METHANE; ORGANIC CARBON;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIODEGRADATION; BIOMASS; DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON; INOCULATION; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BIOACCUMULATION; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CARBON METABOLISM; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DEGRADATION KINETICS; GAS ANALYSIS; HYDROLYSIS KINETICS; METHANOGENIC ARCHAEON; METHANOSARCINA ACETIVORANS; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SLUDGE DIGESTION; SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BIOREACTORS; GASES; KINETICS; REFUSE DISPOSAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84870252762     PISSN: 0956053X     EISSN: 18792456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.024     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ademe, 1993. MODECOM™. Méthode de Caractérisation des Ordures Ménagères (Connaître pour agir - Manuel de base, Edn.).
2. AFNOR European Standard NF EN 12880. Characterisation of Sludges. Dry Matter and Water Content 2000, AFNOR.
3. Casamayor E.O., Massana R. Changes in archaeal, bacterial and eukaryal assemblages along a salinity gradient by comparison of genetic fingerprinting methods in a multipond solar saltern. Environmental Microbiology 2002, 4:338-348.
4. Fisher M.M., Triplett E.W. Automated approach for ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of microbial diversity and its application to freshwater bacterial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1999, 65:4630-4636.
5. Gonzalez-Fernandez C., Garcia-Encina P.A. Impact of substrate to inoculum ratio in anaerobic digestion of swine slurry. Biomass and Bioenergy 2009, 33:1065-1069.
6. Hashimoto A.G. Effect of inoculum/substrate ratio on methane yield and production rate from straw. Biological Wastes 1989, 28:247-255.
7. Kugelman Mc.Carty. Cation toxicity and stimulation in anaerobic waste treatment. I. Slug feed studies. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 1965, 37:97-116.
8. Lay J.J., Li Y.Y. Mathematical model for methane production from landfill bioreactor. Journal of Environmental Engineering - ASCE 1998, 124:730-736.
9. Liu Y.T., Balkwill D.L., Aldrich H.C., Drake G.R., Boone D.R. Characterization of the anaerobic propioate-degrading syntrophs Smithella propionica gen. nov., sp. nov. and Syntrophobacter wolinii. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1999, 49:545-556.
10. Lopes W.S., Leite V.D., Prasad S. Influence of inoculum on performance of anaerobic reactors for treating municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technology 2004, 94:261-266.
11. Loy A., Lee N., Adamczyk J., Meier H., Ernst J., Shleifer K.H., Wagner M. Oligonucleotide microarray for 16S rRNA gene-based detection of all recognized lineages of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes in the environment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2002, 68:5064-6081.
12. Moreno-Andrade I., Buitron G. Influence of the initial substrate to microorganisms concentration ratio on the methanogenic inhibition test. Water Science and Technology 2003, 48:17-22.
13. Neves L., Oliveira R., Alves M.M. Influence of inoculum activity on the bio-methanization of a kitchen waste under different waste/inoculum ratios. Process Biochemistry 2004, 39:2019-2024.
14. Parawira W., Murto M., Zvauya R., Mattiasson B. Anaerobic batch digestion of solid potato waste alone and in combination with sugar beet leaves. Renewable Energy 2004, 29:1811-1823.
15. Qu X., Vavilin V.A., Mazéas L., Lemunier M., Duquennoi C., He P.J., Bouchez T. Anaerobic biodegradation of cellulosic material: batch experiments and modelling based on isotopic data and focusing on acetoclastic and non-acetoclastic methanogenesis. Waste Management 2009, 29:1828-1837.
16. Raposo F., Banks C.J., Siegert I., Heaven S., Borja R. Influence of inoculum to substrate ratio on the biochemical methane potential of maize in batch tests. Process Biochemistry 2006, 41:1444-1450.
17. Raposo F., Borja R., Martin M.A., Martin A., de la Rubia M.A., Rincon B. Influence of inoculum to substrate ratio on the anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode: process stability and kinetic evaluation. Chemical Engineering Journal 2009, 149:70-77.
18. Song H., Clarke W.P. Cellulose hydrolysis by a methanogenic culture enriched from landfill waste in a semi-continuous reactor. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:1268-1273.
19. 2 reduction vs. acetate fermentation. Isotope evidence. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 1986, 50:693-709.
20. Zhu B., Gikas P., Zhang R., Lord J., Jenkins B., Li X. Characteristics and biogas production potential of municipal solid wastes pretreated with a rotary drum reactor. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:1122-1129.
21. Zwietering M.H., Jongenburger I. Modeling of the bacterial-growth curve. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1990, 56:1875-1881.