메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 31, Issue 28, 2012, Pages 3537-3544

Generalized multidimensional dynamic allocation method

Author keywords

Covariate adaptive randomization; Dynamic allocation; Minimization; Unbalanced design

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GENERALIZED MULTIDIMENSIONAL DYNAMIC ALLOCATION METHOD; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METHODOLOGY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROBABILITY; PROCESS MODEL; PROGNOSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

EID: 84870251878     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.5418     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (12)

References (27)
  • 2
    • 0142184914 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The pursuit of balance using stratified and dynamic randomization techniques: An overview
    • McEntegart DJ. The pursuit of balance using stratified and dynamic randomization techniques: An overview. Drug Information Journal 2003; 37:293-308.
    • (2003) Drug Information Journal , vol.37 , pp. 293-308
    • McEntegart, D.J.1
  • 3
    • 0016799829 scopus 로고
    • Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial
    • Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 1975; 31:103-115.
    • (1975) Biometrics , vol.31 , pp. 103-115
    • Pocock, S.J.1    Simon, R.2
  • 4
    • 0024211411 scopus 로고
    • Imbalance in treatment assignments in stratified blocked randomization
    • Hallstrom A, Davis K. Imbalance in treatment assignments in stratified blocked randomization. Controlled Clinical Trials 1988; 9:375-382.
    • (1988) Controlled Clinical Trials , vol.9 , pp. 375-382
    • Hallstrom, A.1    Davis, K.2
  • 5
    • 0016211783 scopus 로고
    • Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups
    • Taves DR. Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1974; 15:443-453.
    • (1974) Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics , vol.15 , pp. 443-453
    • Taves, D.R.1
  • 6
    • 77249096450 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The use of minimization in clinical trials
    • Taves DR. The use of minimization in clinical trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2010; 31:180-184.
    • (2010) Contemporary Clinical Trials , vol.31 , pp. 180-184
    • Taves, D.R.1
  • 8
    • 77952769492 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Trends in the application of dynamic allocation methods in multi-arm cancer clinical trials
    • Pond GR, Tang PA, Welch SA, Chen EX. Trends in the application of dynamic allocation methods in multi-arm cancer clinical trials. Cinical Trials 2010; 7:227-234.
    • (2010) Cinical Trials , vol.7 , pp. 227-234
    • Pond, G.R.1    Tang, P.A.2    Welch, S.A.3    Chen, E.X.4
  • 9
    • 79957588775 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Statistical issues in the use of dynamic allocation methods for balancing baseline covariates
    • Pond GR. Statistical issues in the use of dynamic allocation methods for balancing baseline covariates. British Journal of Cancer 2011; 104:1711-1715.
    • (2011) British Journal of Cancer , vol.104 , pp. 1711-1715
    • Pond, G.R.1
  • 10
    • 70449372333 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation
    • Han B, Enas NH, McEntegart D. Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation. Statistics in Medicine 2009; 28:3329-3346.
    • (2009) Statistics in Medicine , vol.28 , pp. 3329-3346
    • Han, B.1    Enas, N.H.2    McEntegart, D.3
  • 11
    • 68549140136 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparative evaluation of balancing properties of stratified randomization procedures
    • Kundt G. Comparative evaluation of balancing properties of stratified randomization procedures. Methods on Information in Medicine 2009; 48:129-134.
    • (2009) Methods on Information in Medicine , vol.48 , pp. 129-134
    • Kundt, G.1
  • 13
    • 73949133098 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Use of simulation to compare the performance of minimization with stratified blocked randomization
    • Toorawa R, Adena M, Donovan M, Jones S, Conlon J. Use of simulation to compare the performance of minimization with stratified blocked randomization. Pharmaceutical Statistics 2009; 8:264-278.
    • (2009) Pharmaceutical Statistics , vol.8 , pp. 264-278
    • Toorawa, R.1    Adena, M.2    Donovan, M.3    Jones, S.4    Conlon, J.5
  • 14
    • 30944443334 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimization-reducing predictability for multi-centre trials whilst retaining balance within centre
    • Brown S, Thorpe H, Hawkins K, Brown J. Minimization-reducing predictability for multi-centre trials whilst retaining balance within centre. Statistics in Medicine 2005; 24:3715-3727.
    • (2005) Statistics in Medicine , vol.24 , pp. 3715-3727
    • Brown, S.1    Thorpe, H.2    Hawkins, K.3    Brown, J.4
  • 16
    • 0037445413 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial
    • Weir CJ, Lees KR. Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial. Statistics in Medicine 2003; 22:705-726.
    • (2003) Statistics in Medicine , vol.22 , pp. 705-726
    • Weir, C.J.1    Lees, K.R.2
  • 23
    • 0009663357 scopus 로고
    • A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control
    • Dunnett CW.A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1955; 50:1096-1121.
    • (1955) Journal of the American Statistical Association , vol.50 , pp. 1096-1121
    • Dunnett, C.W.1
  • 25
    • 77952827491 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A theory for testing hypotheses under covariate-adaptive randomization
    • Shao J, Yu X, Zhong B.A theory for testing hypotheses under covariate-adaptive randomization. Biometrika 2010; 97(2):347-360.
    • (2010) Biometrika , vol.97 , Issue.2 , pp. 347-360
    • Shao, J.1    Yu, X.2    Zhong, B.3
  • 26
    • 0034732875 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Pros and cons of permutation tests in clinical trials
    • Berger VW. Pros and cons of permutation tests in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 2000; 19:1319-1328.
    • (2000) Statistics in Medicine , vol.19 , pp. 1319-1328
    • Berger, V.W.1
  • 27
    • 60749094498 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Permutation test following covariate-adaptive randomization in randomized controlled trials
    • Hasegawa T, Tango T. Permutation test following covariate-adaptive randomization in randomized controlled trials. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 2009; 19:106-119.
    • (2009) Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics , vol.19 , pp. 106-119
    • Hasegawa, T.1    Tango, T.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.