-
2
-
-
0142184914
-
The pursuit of balance using stratified and dynamic randomization techniques: An overview
-
McEntegart DJ. The pursuit of balance using stratified and dynamic randomization techniques: An overview. Drug Information Journal 2003; 37:293-308.
-
(2003)
Drug Information Journal
, vol.37
, pp. 293-308
-
-
McEntegart, D.J.1
-
3
-
-
0016799829
-
Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial
-
Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 1975; 31:103-115.
-
(1975)
Biometrics
, vol.31
, pp. 103-115
-
-
Pocock, S.J.1
Simon, R.2
-
4
-
-
0024211411
-
Imbalance in treatment assignments in stratified blocked randomization
-
Hallstrom A, Davis K. Imbalance in treatment assignments in stratified blocked randomization. Controlled Clinical Trials 1988; 9:375-382.
-
(1988)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.9
, pp. 375-382
-
-
Hallstrom, A.1
Davis, K.2
-
5
-
-
0016211783
-
Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups
-
Taves DR. Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1974; 15:443-453.
-
(1974)
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
, vol.15
, pp. 443-453
-
-
Taves, D.R.1
-
6
-
-
77249096450
-
The use of minimization in clinical trials
-
Taves DR. The use of minimization in clinical trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2010; 31:180-184.
-
(2010)
Contemporary Clinical Trials
, vol.31
, pp. 180-184
-
-
Taves, D.R.1
-
8
-
-
77952769492
-
Trends in the application of dynamic allocation methods in multi-arm cancer clinical trials
-
Pond GR, Tang PA, Welch SA, Chen EX. Trends in the application of dynamic allocation methods in multi-arm cancer clinical trials. Cinical Trials 2010; 7:227-234.
-
(2010)
Cinical Trials
, vol.7
, pp. 227-234
-
-
Pond, G.R.1
Tang, P.A.2
Welch, S.A.3
Chen, E.X.4
-
9
-
-
79957588775
-
Statistical issues in the use of dynamic allocation methods for balancing baseline covariates
-
Pond GR. Statistical issues in the use of dynamic allocation methods for balancing baseline covariates. British Journal of Cancer 2011; 104:1711-1715.
-
(2011)
British Journal of Cancer
, vol.104
, pp. 1711-1715
-
-
Pond, G.R.1
-
10
-
-
70449372333
-
Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation
-
Han B, Enas NH, McEntegart D. Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation. Statistics in Medicine 2009; 28:3329-3346.
-
(2009)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.28
, pp. 3329-3346
-
-
Han, B.1
Enas, N.H.2
McEntegart, D.3
-
11
-
-
68549140136
-
Comparative evaluation of balancing properties of stratified randomization procedures
-
Kundt G. Comparative evaluation of balancing properties of stratified randomization procedures. Methods on Information in Medicine 2009; 48:129-134.
-
(2009)
Methods on Information in Medicine
, vol.48
, pp. 129-134
-
-
Kundt, G.1
-
13
-
-
73949133098
-
Use of simulation to compare the performance of minimization with stratified blocked randomization
-
Toorawa R, Adena M, Donovan M, Jones S, Conlon J. Use of simulation to compare the performance of minimization with stratified blocked randomization. Pharmaceutical Statistics 2009; 8:264-278.
-
(2009)
Pharmaceutical Statistics
, vol.8
, pp. 264-278
-
-
Toorawa, R.1
Adena, M.2
Donovan, M.3
Jones, S.4
Conlon, J.5
-
14
-
-
30944443334
-
Minimization-reducing predictability for multi-centre trials whilst retaining balance within centre
-
Brown S, Thorpe H, Hawkins K, Brown J. Minimization-reducing predictability for multi-centre trials whilst retaining balance within centre. Statistics in Medicine 2005; 24:3715-3727.
-
(2005)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.24
, pp. 3715-3727
-
-
Brown, S.1
Thorpe, H.2
Hawkins, K.3
Brown, J.4
-
15
-
-
9944220574
-
Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials
-
Hagino A, Hamada C, Yoshimura I, Ohashi Y, Sakamoto J, Nakazato H. Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 2004; 25:572-584.
-
(2004)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.25
, pp. 572-584
-
-
Hagino, A.1
Hamada, C.2
Yoshimura, I.3
Ohashi, Y.4
Sakamoto, J.5
Nakazato, H.6
-
16
-
-
0037445413
-
Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial
-
Weir CJ, Lees KR. Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial. Statistics in Medicine 2003; 22:705-726.
-
(2003)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.22
, pp. 705-726
-
-
Weir, C.J.1
Lees, K.R.2
-
23
-
-
0009663357
-
A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control
-
Dunnett CW.A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1955; 50:1096-1121.
-
(1955)
Journal of the American Statistical Association
, vol.50
, pp. 1096-1121
-
-
Dunnett, C.W.1
-
25
-
-
77952827491
-
A theory for testing hypotheses under covariate-adaptive randomization
-
Shao J, Yu X, Zhong B.A theory for testing hypotheses under covariate-adaptive randomization. Biometrika 2010; 97(2):347-360.
-
(2010)
Biometrika
, vol.97
, Issue.2
, pp. 347-360
-
-
Shao, J.1
Yu, X.2
Zhong, B.3
-
26
-
-
0034732875
-
Pros and cons of permutation tests in clinical trials
-
Berger VW. Pros and cons of permutation tests in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 2000; 19:1319-1328.
-
(2000)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.19
, pp. 1319-1328
-
-
Berger, V.W.1
-
27
-
-
60749094498
-
Permutation test following covariate-adaptive randomization in randomized controlled trials
-
Hasegawa T, Tango T. Permutation test following covariate-adaptive randomization in randomized controlled trials. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 2009; 19:106-119.
-
(2009)
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
, vol.19
, pp. 106-119
-
-
Hasegawa, T.1
Tango, T.2
|