A comparison among observations and earthquake simulator results for the allcal2 California fault model

Seismological Research Letters

Volumn 83, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 994-1006

  Tullis, Terry E ^a   Richards Dinger, Keith ^b   Barall, Michael ^c   Dieterich, James H ^b   Field, Edward H ^d   Heien, Eric M ^e   Kellogg, Louise H ^e   Pollitz, Fred F ^f   Rundle, John B ^e,h   Sachs, Michael K ^e   Turcotte, Donald L ^e   Ward, Steven N ^g   Yikilmaz, M Burak ^e  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Invisible Software Inc   (United States)

^d U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIFORNIA; DENSITY PLOTS; EARTHQUAKE SIMULATOR; FAULT MODEL; ON-LINE MATERIALS; RECURRENCE INTERVALS; SCALING PLOTS;

DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

EARTHQUAKES;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EARTHQUAKE; FREQUENCY-MAGNITUDE DISTRIBUTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; RECURRENCE INTERVAL;

EID: 84870209698     PISSN: 08950695     EISSN: 19382057     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0220120094     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Barall, M. (2012). Data transfer file formats for earthquake simulators, Seismol. Res. Lett. 83, no. 6, 991-993.
2. Ellsworth, W. L. (2003). Magnitude and Area Data for Strike Slip Earthquakes, Appendix D, Earthquake Probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region: 2002-2031, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 2003-214.
3. Field, E. H., T. E. Dawson, K. R. Felzer, A. D. Frankel, V. Gupta, T. H. Jordan, T. Parsons, M. D. Petersen, R. S. Stein, R. J. Weldon II, and C. J. Wills (2008). The Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2), U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 2007-1437.
4. Hanks, T. C., and W. H. Bakun (2002). A bilinear source-scaling model for M - log A observations of continental earthquakes, Bull. Seis-mol. Soc. Am. 92, no. 5, 1,841-1,846, doi: 10.1785/0120010148.
5. Lapusta, N., J. Rice, Y. Ben-Zion, and G. Zheng (2000). Elastodynamic analysis for slow tectonic loading with spontaneous rupture episodes on faults with rate- and state-dependent friction, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 23,765-23,789.
6. Pollitz, F. F. (2012). ViscoSim earthquake simulator, Seismol. Res. Lett. 83, no. 6, 979-982.
7. Richards-Dinger, K., and J. H. Dieterich (2012). RSQSim earthquake simulator, Seismol. Res. Lett. 83, no. 6, 983-990.
8. Sachs, M. K., M. B. Yikilmaz, E. M. Heien, J. B. Rundle, D. L. Turcotte, and L. H. Kellogg (2012). Virtual California earthquake simulator, Seismol. Res. Lett. 83, no. 6, 973-978.
9. Tullis, T. E., K. Richards-Dinger, M. Barall, J. H. Dieterich, E. H. Field, E. M. Heien, L. H. Kellogg, F. F. Pollitz, J. B. Rundle, M. K. Sachs, D. L. Turcotte, S. N. Ward, and M. B. Yikilmaz (2012). Generic earthquake simulator, Seismol. Res. Lett. 83, no. 6, 959-963.
10. Ward, S. N. (2012). ALLCAL earthquake simulator, Seismol. Res. Lett. 83, no. 6, 964-972.
11. Wells, D. L., and K. J. Coppersmith (1994). New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area and surface displacement, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, no. 4, 974-1,002.