What are we? What should we be?

Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom)

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 475-476

  Leung, Gabriel M ^a   Gray, Selena ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL FACTOR; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MANPOWER; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLIC HEALTH; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; PUBLIC HEALTH;

EID: 84870197553     PISSN: 17413842     EISSN: 17413850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fds096     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Horton R. Offline: why life is better in Australia. Lancet 2012;380:1042.
2. OECD Health Data 2012. http://www.oecd.org/health/ healthpoliciesanddata/ OECDHealthData2012FrequentlyRequested Data-Updated.xls (1 October 2012, date last accessed).
3. Tobacco Free Initiative, World Health Organisation. Global adult tobacco survey (GATS). China fact sheet. http://www.who.int/entity/tobacco/surveillance/ en-tfi-china-gats-factsheet-2010.pdf (1 October2012, date last accessed).
4. Subramanyam MA, Subramanian SV. Research on social inequalities in health in India. Indian J Med Res 2011;133:461-3.
5. Horton R.Offline: where is public health leadership in England? Lancet 2011, 378 1060.
6. Chadwick E. Report on an enquiry into the sanitary condition of the labouring population of Great Britain. London: Clowes, 1842.
7. Cochrane AL. Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1972.