Committee opinion no. 546: Tracking and reminder systems

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 120, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1535-1537

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; TRACKING SYSTEM;

FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; OBSTETRICS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; REMINDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84870191181     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000423820.92906.d0     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Institute of Medicine. Health IT and patient safety: Building safer systems for better care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2012.
2. Gandhi, TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, Puopolo AL, Yoon C, Brennan TA, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: A study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:488-96. (Pubitemid 46780952)
3. Department of Health and Human Services. HIPAA-frequently asked questions. Available at: Http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/faq. Retrieved August 24, 2012.
4. Matheny ME, Gandhi TK, Orav EJ, Ladak-Merchant Z, Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, et al. Impact of an automated test results management system on patients' satisfaction about test result communication. Arch Inter Med 2007;167: 2233-9. (Pubitemid 350106744)
5. Shojania KG, Jennings A, Mayhew A, Ramsay CR, Eccles MP, Grimshaw J. The effects of on-screen, point-of-care computer reminders on process and outcomes of care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001096. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001096.pub2.