A numerical issue in calculating the coupled carbon and water fluxes in a climate model

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Volumn 117, Issue 22, 2012, Pages

  Sun, Ying ^a   Gu, Lianhong ^b   Dickinson, Robert E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; MOISTURE; TRANSPIRATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VAPOR PRESSURE; VAPORS;

ATMOSPHERIC WATER VAPOR; COMMUNITY LAND MODELS; COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; FIXED POINT THEOREMS; FIXED-POINT ITERATIONS; GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTION; ITERATIVE CALCULATION; LAND SURFACE; NEWTON RAPHSON ITERATION; NEWTON-RAPHSON; NUMERICAL INSTABILITY; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; WATER FLUX;

ITERATIVE METHODS;

ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; CARBON FLUX; CLIMATE MODELING; ESTIMATION METHOD; LAND SURFACE; NUMERICAL METHOD; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; VAPOR PRESSURE; WATER FLOW; WATER VAPOR;

EID: 84870186759     PISSN: 01480227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2012JD018059     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aubinet, M., T. Vesala, and D. Papale (2012), Eddy Covariance: A Pratical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
2. Baldocchi, D. (1994), An analytical solution for coupled leaf photosynthesis and stomatal conductance models, Tree Physiol., 14, 1069-1079, doi:10.1093/treephys/14.7-8-9.1069.
3. Ball, J. T., I. E. Woodrow, and J. A. Berry (1987), A model predicting sto-matal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions, in Progress in Photosynthesis Research, vol. 4, edited by J. Biggins, pp. 221-224, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
4. Beer, C., et al. (2010), Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: Global distribution and covariation with climate, Science, 329, 834-838, doi:10.1126/science.1184984.
5. Bonan, G. B., P. J. Lawrence, K. W. Oleson, S. Levis, M. Jung, M. Reichstein, D. M. Lawrence, and S. C. Swenson (2011), Improving canopy processes in the Community Land Model version 4(CLM4) using global flux fields empirically inferred from FLUXNET data, J. Geophys. Res., 116, G02014, doi:10.1029/2010JG001593.
6. Bonan, G. B., K. W. Oleson, R. A. Fisher, G. Lasslop, and M. Reichstein (2012), Reconciling leaf physiological traits and canopy flux data: Use of the TRY and FLUXNET databases in the Community Land Model version 4, J. Geophys. Res., 117, G02026, doi:10.1029/2011JG001913.
7. Burden, R. L., and J. D. Faires (2011), Numerical Analysis, 9th ed., Brooks/Cole, Boston, Mass.
8. Collatz, G. J., J. T. Ball, C. Grivet, and J. A. Berry (1991), Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: A model that includes a laminar boundary layer, Agric. For. Meteorol., 54, 107-136, doi:10.1016/0168-1923(91)90002-8.
9. Collatz, G. J., M. Ribas-Carbo, and J. A. Berry (1992), Coupled photosyn-thesis-stomatal conductance model for leaves of C4 plants, Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 19, 519-538, doi:10.1071/PP9920519.
10. Dai, Y., R. E. Dickinson, and Y.-P. Wang (2004), A two-big-leaf model for canopy temperature, photosynthesis, and stomatal conductance, J. Clim., 17, 2281-2299, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2004)0172.0. CO;2.
11. Dickinson, R. E. (2012), Interaction between future climate and terrestrial carbon and nitrogen, in The Future of the Worlds Climate, edited by A. Henderson-Sellers and K. McGuffie, pp. 289-308, Elsevier, Oxford, U. K., doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-386917-3.00011-7.
12. Dickinson, R. E., A. Henderson-Sellers, and P. J. Kennedy (1993), Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) version 1e as coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model, NCAR Tech. Note TN-387 +STR, 72 pp., Natl. Cent. for Atmos. Res., Boulder, Colo.
13. Dickinson, R. E., et al. (2002), Nitrogen controls on climate model evapo-transpiration, J. Clim., 15, 278-295, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2002) 0152.0.CO;2. (Pubitemid 34553960)
14. Farquhar, G. D., S. V. Caemmerer, and J. A. Berry (1980), A biochemical-model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species, Planta, 149, 78-90, doi:10.1007/BF00386231.
15. Friedlingstein, P., et al. (2006), Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C4MIP model intercomparison, J. Clim., 19, 3337-3353, doi:10.1175/JCLI3800.1. (Pubitemid 44177898)
16. Fung, I. Y., S. C. Doney, K. Lindsay, and J. John (2005), Evolution of carbon sinks in a changing climate, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 11,201-11,206, doi:10.1073/pnas.0504949102. (Pubitemid 41153798)
17. Gu, L., T. Meyers, S. G. Pallardy, P. J. Hanson, B. Yang, M. Heuer, K. P. Hosman, J. S. Riggs, D. Sluss, and S. D. Wullschleger (2006), Direct and indirect effects of atmospheric conditions and soil moisture on surface energy partitioning revealed by a prolonged drought at a temperate forest site, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D16102, doi:10.1029/2006JD007161. (Pubitemid 46290718)
18. Gu, L., S. G. Pallardy, K. Tu, B. E. Law, and S. D. Wullschleger (2010), Reliable estimation of biochemical parameters from C3 leaf photosynthesis-intercellular carbon dioxide response curves, Plant Cell Environ., 33, 1852-1874, doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02192.x.
19. Neale, R. B., A. J. Conley, P. H. Lauritzen, D. L. Williamson, P. J. Rasch, S. J. Vavrus, M. A. Taylor, U. C. Berkeley, L. Berkeley, and S. Lin (2010), Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM 4.0), NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-478+STR, 212 pp., Natl. Cent. for Atmos. Res., Boulder, Colo.
20. Oleson, K. W., et al. (2010), Technical Description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model (CLM), NCAR Tech. Note TN-478+STR, 257 pp., Natl. Cent. for Atmos. Res., Boulder, Colo.
21. Qian, T., A. Dai, K. E. Trenberth, and K. W. Oleson (2006), Simulation of global land surface conditions from 1948 to 2004. Part I: Forcing data and evaluations, J. Hydrometeorol., 7, 953-975, doi:10.1175/JHM540.1. (Pubitemid 44734307)
22. Sakaguchi, K., X. Zeng, B. J. Christoffersen, N. Restrepo-Coupe, S. R. Saleska, and P. M. Brando (2011), Natural and drought scenarios in an east central Amazon forest: Fidelity of the Community Land Model 3.5 with three biogeochemical models, J. Geophys. Res., 116, G01029, doi:10.1029/2010JG001477.
23. Sarmiento, J. L., M. Gloor, N. Gruber, C. Beaulieu, A. R. Jacobson, S. E. Mikaloff Fletcher, S. Pacala, and K. Rodgers (2010), Trends and regional distributions of land and ocean carbon sinks, Biogeosciences, 7, 2351-2367, doi:10.5194/bg-7-2351-2010.
24. Sellers, P. J., D. A. Randall, G. J. Collatz, J. A. Berry, C. B. Field, D. A. Dazlich, C. Zhang, G. D. Collelo, and L. Bounoua (1996), A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMS. Part I: Model formulation, J. Clim., 9, 676-705, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1996)0092.0.CO;2. (Pubitemid 126544330)
25. Sitch, S., et al. (2008), Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate-carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs), Global Change Biol., 14, 2015-2039, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01626.x.
26. Solomon, S., G.-K. Plattner, R. Knutti, and P. Friedlingstein (2009), Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 106, 1704-1709, doi:10.1073/pnas.0812721106.
27. Zhao, M., and S. W. Running (2010), Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 through 2009, Science, 329, 940-943, doi:10.1126/science.1192666.