Accessibility of web search engines: Towards a deeper understanding of barriers for people with disabilities

Library Review

Volumn 61, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 608-621

  Kerkmann, Friederike ^a   Lewandowski, Dirk ^a  

^a HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Disability; Disabled people; Inclusion; Internet; Search engines; Web Accessibility Initiative; Web search; Web search engine

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870183391     PISSN: 00242535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00242531211292105     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Albrecht, G.L. and Seelman, K.D. (2001), Handbook of Disability Studies, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
2. Andronico, P., Buzzi, M. and Leporini, B. (2005), "Increasing usability of search engine interfaces for the blind", Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, UAHCI-HCI2005.
3. Andronico, P., Buzzi, M., Castillo, C. and Leporini, B. (2006), "Improving search engine interfaces for blind users: a case study" in Universal Access Information, Vol. 5, pp. 23-40.
4. Berger, A., Caspers, T., Croll, J., Hofmann, J., Kubicek, H., Peter, U., Ruth-Janneck, D. and Trump, T. (2010) Mensch, A. (Ed.), Web 2.0/barrierefrei. Eine Studie zur Nutzung von Web 2.0 Anwendungen durch Menschen mit Behinderung, available at: www.digitale-chancen.de/transfer/downloads/MD967.pdf (accessed June 2012).
5. Brajnik, G. (2008a), "A comparative test of web accessibility evaluation methods" in Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Assets '08), ACM, New York, NY, USA, October 13-15, pp. 113-20.
6. Brajnik, G. (2008b), "Beyond conformance: the role of accessibility evaluation method" in Hartmann, S. (Ed.), pp. 63-80, WISE LNCS 5176.
7. Broder, A. (2002), "A taxonomy of web search" in SIGIR Forum, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 3-10.
8. Buzzi, M., Andronico, P. and Leporini, B. (2004), "Accessibility and usability of search engines: a preliminary study" in Proceedings of 8th User Interface for All (UI4ALL), Vienna, Austria, June 28-29, p. 1.
9. Centeno, V.L., Kloos, C.D., Fisteus, J.A. and Álvarez, L.A. (2006), "Web accessibility evaluation tools: a survey and some improvements" in Electronical Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 157, pp. 87-100.
10. Charlton, J.I. (1998), Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment, University of California Press, Berkely, CA.
11. Comeaux, D. and Schmetzke, A. (2007), "Web accessibility trends in university libraries and library schools" in Library Hi Tech., Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 457-77.
12. Conway, V. (2011), "Website accessibility in western Australian public libraries" in The Australian Library Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 103-12.
13. Craven, J. and Brophy, P. (2003), "Non-visual access to the digital library: the use of digital library interfaces by blind and visually impaired people", Centre for Research in Library and Information Management, Manchester, Library and Information Commission Research Report 145.
14. Disability Funders Network (2009), "Disability and inclusive societies", available at: www.disabilityfunders.org/webfm_send/21 (accessed June 2012).
15. Disabled World (2010), "Definitions of the models of disability", Glossary list of definitions and explanations of the models of disability in society today, available at: www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php (accessed June 2012).
16. Ellison, J. (2002), "Assessing the accessibility of fifty United States government webpages: using Bobby to check Uncle Sam", First Monday, Vol. 9, No. 7, available at: www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1161 (accessed June 2012).
17. EN ISO 9241-11 (1998), Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on Usability, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
18. Henry, S.L. (2007), Just Ask: Integrating Accessibility Throughout Design, available at: http://uiaccess.com/accessucd/ (accessed June 2012).
19. Höchstötter, N. and Lewandowski, D. (2009), "What users see: structures in search engine results pages" in Information Sciences, Vol. 179, No. 12, pp. 1796-812.
20. IBM, Human Ability and Accessibility Center (2012), IBM, Armonk, NY, White Paper: Conducting User Evaluations with People with Disabilities.
21. International Federation of Library Association and Institutions (2010), IFLA Professional Reports No. 120.
22. Ivory, M.Y., Yu, S. and Gronemyer, K. (2004), "Search result exploration: a preliminary study of blind and sighted users' decision making and performance" in CHI 2004 Extended Abstracts, Vol. 2004, pp. 1453-6.
23. Kelly, B. (2002), "WebWatch: an accessibility analysis of UK university entry points", Ariadne, No. 33, available at: www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue33/web-watch/ (accessed June 2012).
24. Levene, M. (2006), An Introduction to Search Engines and Web Navigation, Addison-Wesley, Harlow, An imprint of Pearson Education.
25. Lewandowski, D. (2008), "The retrieval effectiveness of web search engines: considering results descriptions" in Journal of Documentation, Vol. 64, No. 6, pp. 915-37.
26. Lewandowski, D. and Höchstötter, N. (2008), "Web searching: a quality measurement perspective" in Spink, A. and Zimmer, M. (Eds.), Web Search: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Springer, Berlin, pp. 309-340.
27. Machill, M., Neuberger, C., Schweiger, W. and Wirth, W. (2004), "Navigating the internet: a study of German-language search engines" in European Journal of Communication, Vol. 19, pp. 321-47.
28. Mifsud, J. (2011), "10 free web-based web site accessibility evaluation tools", available at: http://usabilitygeek.com/10-free-web-based-web-site-accessibility-evaluation-tools/ (accessed June 2012).
29. MPFS (2011), JIM-Studie 2011: Jugend, Information (Multi-)Media, Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest, Stuttgart, Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger.
30. Olalere, A. and Lazar, J. (2011), "Accessibility of US federal government home pages: section 508 compliance and site accessibility statements" in Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 303-9.
31. Oppenheim, C. and Selby, K. (1999), "Access to information on the world wide web for blind and visually impaired people" in Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 51, No. 10, pp. 335-45.
32. Quirmbach, S. (2011), "Usability und user experience in Suchmaschinen" in Lewandowski, D. (Ed.), Handbuch Internet-Suchmaschinen, AKA Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 229-63.
33. Röhle, T. (2010), Der Google Komplex. Über Macht im Zeitalter des Internets, Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld.
34. RTC/IL (2001), Guidelines for Reporting and Writing About People with Disabilities: Appropriate Terminology and Portrayal Issues, Research and Training Center on Independent Living, Lawrence, KS, available at: www.rtcil.org/products/RTCIL%20publications/Media/Guidelines%20for%20Reporting%20and%20Writing%20about%20People%20with%20Disabilities.pdf (accessed June 2012).
35. Ruth-Janneck, D. (2011), "An integrative accessibility engineering approach using multidimensional classifications of barriers in the web", Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A '11), ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 10.
36. Schmetzke, A. and Comeaux, D. (2009), "Accessibility trends among academic library and library schools websites in the USA and Canada" in Journal of Access Services, Vol. 6, Nos 1/2, pp. 137-52.
37. Society for Disability Studies (2004), Guidelines for Disability Studies Programs, available at: http://disstudies.org/guidelines-for-disability-studies-programs/ (accessed June 2012).
38. Spink, A. and Jansen, B.J. (2004), Web Search: Public Searching of the Web: Information Science and Knowledge Management, Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA.
39. Tullis, T. and Albert, B. (2008), Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing and Presenting Usability Metrics, Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, VT.
40. Vanderheiden, G.C. (1996), "Universal design what it is and what it isn't", available at: http://trace.wisc.edu/docs/whats_ud/whats_ud.htm (accessed June 2012).
41. Van Eimeren, B. and Frees, B. (2011), ARD/ZDF-Onlinestudie, available at: www.ard-zdf-onlinestudie.de/index.php?id=onlinenutzunganwend0 (accessed June 2012).
42. WAI (2005a), "Conformance evaluation of websites for accessibility", available at: www.w3.org/WAI/eval/conformance.html (accessed June 2012).
43. WAI (2005b), "Introduction to web accessibility", available at: www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php (accessed June 2012).
44. WAI (2005c), "Preliminary review of websites for accessibility", available at: www.w3.org/WAI/eval/preliminary.html (accessed June 2012).
45. WAI (2005d), W3C Web Accessibility Initiative: Strategies, Guidelines, Resources to Make the Web Accessible to People with Disabilities, available at: www.w3.org/WAI/ (accessed June 2012).
46. WAI (2006), "Complete list of web accessibility evaluation tools", available at: www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/complete (accessed June 2012).
47. WAI (2010), "Involving users in evaluating web accessibility", available at: www.w3.org/WAI/eval/users.html (accessed June 2012).
48. WebAIM (2012a), "Accessibility evaluation tools: list of accessibility evaluation tools", available at: http://webaim.org/articles/tools/#list (accessed June).
49. WebAIM (2012b), "People with disabilities on the web", available at: http://webaim.org/intro/#people (accessed June).
50. WebAIM (2012c), "Testing with screen readers: questions and answers", available at: http://webaim.org/articles/screenreader_testing/ (accessed June).
51. W3C (2008) Caldwell, B., Cooper, M., Guarino Reid, L. and Vanderheiden, G. (Eds.), Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0, W3C Recommendation 11.
52. UN-Convention (2006), "Convention of the United Nations on the rights of persons with disabilities", available at: www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml (accessed June 2012).
53. World Health Organization (2012), "Health topics: disabilities", available at: www.who.int/topics/disabilities/en/ (accessed June 2012).