Traumatic brain injury in latin America: Lifespan analysis randomized control trial protocol

Neurosurgery

Volumn 71, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1055-1063

  Chesnut, Randall M ^a,b   Temkin, Nancy ^a   Carney, Nancy ^c   Dikmen, Sureyya ^a,b   Pridgeon, Jim ^a   Barber, Jason ^a   Celix, Juanita M ^a   Chaddock, Kelley ^a   Cherner, Marianna ^d   Hendrix, Terence ^e   Lujan, Silvia ^f   MacHamer, Joan ^b   Petroni, Gustavo ^d   Rondina, Carlos ^d   Videtta, Walter ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f Hospital de Emergencias   (Argentina)

^g Hospital Nacional   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Clinical research protocol; Craniocerebral trauma; Intracranial pressure; Randomized controlled trial

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; LENGTH OF STAY; LIFESPAN; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SOUTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

ADULT; AGED; BRAIN INJURIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; LATIN AMERICA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84870066987     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827276b7     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bratton SL, Chesnut RM, Ghajar J, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(suppl 1):S1-S106.
2. O'Brien PC. Procedures for comparing samples with multiple endpoints. Biometrics. 1984;40:1079-1087.
3. Klove H, ed. Grooved Pegboard. Lafayette, IN: Lafayette Instruments; 1963.
4. Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins K, Belleza T, Cope DN. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63(3):118-123.
5. Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15(8):573-585.
6. Levin HS, O'Donnell VM, Grossman RG. The Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test. A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1979;167(11):675-684.
7. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-Mental State" a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12 (3):189-198.
8. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12 (3):189-198.
9. Heaton RK, Psychological Assessment Resources Inc. Revised Comprehensive Norms for an Expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: Demographically Adjusted Neuro-psychological Norms for African American and Caucasian Adults, Professional Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2004.
10. Wechsler D, ed. Wechsler Memory Scale. Third Edition Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1997.
11. Heaton R, Taylor M, Manly J. Demographic effects and use of demographically corrected norms with the WAIS-III and WMS-III. In: Tulsky DS, Chelune G, Ivnik Ret al, eds. Clinical Interpretation of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. San Diego, SC: Academic Press; 2002.
12. Maj M, D'Elia L, Satz P, et al. Evaluation of two new neuropsychological tests designed to minimize cultural bias in the assessment of HIV-1 seropositive persons: a WHO study. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1993;8:123-135.
13. Strauss E, Shermann EMS, Spreen O, eds. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests. Administration, Norms and Commentary. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006.
14. Artiola i Fortuny L, Hermosillo Romo D, Heaton RK, Pardee RE. Manual de Nomas Y Procedimientos Para La Bateria Neuropsicolog. Tucson, AZ: Psychology Press; 2000.
15. Benedict R, ed. Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised: Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.; 1997.
16. Cherner M, Suarez P, Lazzaretto D, et al. Demographically corrected norms for the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-revised and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-revised in monolingual Spanish speakers from the U.S.-Mexico border region. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22(3):343-353.
17. Gladsjo JA, Schumann CC, Evan JD, Peavy GM, Miller SW, Heaton RK. Norms for letters and category fluency: demographic corrections for age, education, and ethnicity. Assessment. 1999;6(2):147-178.
18. Woods SP, Scott J, Sires D, Grant I, Heaton R, Troster AI. Action (verb) fluency: test-retest reliability, normative standards, and construct validity. J Int Neuro-psychol Soc. 2005;11(4):408-415.
19. Borkowski JG, Benton AL, Spreen O. Word fluency and brain damage. Neuropsychologia. 1966;5(2):135-140.
20. O'Brien PC. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics. 1979;35 (3):549-556.
21. Bullock R, Chesnut RM, Clifton G, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe head injury. Eur J Emerg Med. 1996;3(2):109-127.
22. Bullock R, Chesnut R, Clifton G, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Head Injury-Revision 1 (1998). New York, NY: Brain Trauma Foundation; 1998.
23. Bullock R, Chesnut RM, Clifton G, et al. The Brain Trauma Foundation. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The joint section on neurotrauma and critical care. Guidelines for the management of severe head injury-revision. J Neurotrauma. 2000;17(6-7):457-627.