Response surface modeling and optimization of single axis automatic application of automotive polyurethane coatings on plastic components

International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Volumn 63, Issue 9-12, 2012, Pages 1065-1072

  Arunkumar, N ^a   Venkatesh, P ^a   Srinivas, K S ^a   Kaushik, Sanjiv ^a  

^a ST JOSEPH S COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING   (India)

Author keywords

Distinctness of image; Dry film thickness; Optimization; Polyurethane coating; Rating value; Response surface method

Indexed keywords

ACRYLONITRILE BUTADIENE STYRENE; AUTOMATIC APPLICATION; CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGNS; COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION; DISTINCTNESS OF IMAGE; DRY FILM THICKNESS; EFFICIENT SYSTEMS; FULL FACTORIAL; OPTIMAL VALUES; PAINT VISCOSITY; PLASTIC COMPONENTS; POLYURETHANE COATINGS; PROCESS COSTS; PROCESS INPUTS; PROCESS OUTPUT; PROCESS PARAMETERS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; RESPONSE SURFACE MODELING; SINGLE-AXIS;

APPLICATORS; BUTADIENE; FILM THICKNESS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; POLYURETHANES; RATING; STYRENE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

PLASTIC COATINGS;

EID: 84870064189     PISSN: 02683768     EISSN: 14333015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-3970-1     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Blank WJ (1992) Novel polyurethane polyols for waterborne and high solids coatings. Prog Org Coat 20(3-4):235-259
2. Montgomery DC (2001) Design and analysis of experiments, 5th edn. Wiley, New York
3. Paul S (2002) Painting of plastics: new challenges and possibilities. Surf Coating Int B Coating Trans 85(2):79-86
4. Im Kyoung-Su, Lai M-C, Yoon Suck-Ju (2003) Spray characteristics on the electrostatic rotating bell applicator. J Mech Sci Technol 17(12):2053-2065
5. David CC, Prasad NA, Alfred AR (2003) Experimental verification of deposition models for automotive painting with electrostatic rotating bell atomizers. Springer Tr Adv Robot 5(2):136-145
6. Ye Q, Domnick J, Scheibe A, Pulli K (2005) Numerical simulation of electrostatic spray-painting processes in the automotive industry. Springer Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 261-275, High- Performance Computing in Science and Engineering'04
7. Myers RH (1971) Response surface methodology. Allyn and Bacon, New York
8. Lipson C, Sheth NJ (1973) Statistical design and analysis of engineering experiments, 1st edn. Mc-Graw Hill, USA, January 1973
9. Gunaraj V, Murugan N (1999) Application of response surface methodologies for predicting weld base quality in submerged arc welding of pipes. J Mater Process Tech 88(1-3):266-275
10. Box GEP, Hunter JS (1957) Multi-factor experimental design for exploring response surfaces. Ann Math Stat, 28th ed, pp 195-241
11. Box GEP, Hunter JS (1961) The fractional factorial designs, parts I and I.I. J Technometry 3(4):311-458
12. Guthrie JT, Weakley AP (1999) The influence of electrostatic paint application process variables on the orange-peel effect or: a case study in the use of experimental design methods. Surf Coating Int B Coating Trans 82(8):379-383 (Pubitemid 129631222)