Development and psychometric properties of a new social support scale for self-care in middle-aged patients with type II diabetes (S4-MAD)

BMC Public Health

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Naderimagham, Shohreh ^a   Niknami, Shamsaddin ^a   Abolhassani, Farid ^b   Hajizadeh, Ebrahim ^a   Montazeri, Ali ^c  

^a TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; IRAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF CARE; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ADULT; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; IRAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF CARE; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 84870059259     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1035     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 & projections for 2030. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H, Diabetes Care 2004 27 1047 1053 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047 15111519
2. Advances in diabetes for the millennium: healthcare systems and diabetes mellitus. Friedman N, Bressler P, Med Gen Med 2004 6 suppl 3 1
3. Foundation RWJ, The diabetes initiative: a national program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation New York: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation 2006
4. A comparison of diabetes self-care ability scores among inhabitants of urban and rural areas and a group of company employees. Takizawa H, Hoshi T, Int J Urban Sci 2010 14 86 97 10.1080/12265934.2010.9693666
5. Social support in diabetes: a systematic review of controlled intervention studies. van Dam HA, van der Horst FG, Knoops L, Ryckman RM, Crebolder HF, van den Borne BH, Patient Educ Couns 2005 9 1 12
6. Supporting self-management of chronic health conditions: common approaches. Lawn SH, Schoo A, Patient Educ Couns 2010 80 205 211 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.006 19931372
7. Validation of the australian/english version of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale. Mc Dowell J, Courtney M, Edwards H, Shortridge Baggett L, Int J Nurs Pract 2005 11 177 184 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2005.00518.x 15985096
8. When is social support important? The association of family support and professional support with specific diabetes self-management behaviors. Rosland AM, Kieffer E, Israel B, Cofield M, Palmisano G, Sinco B, Spencer M, Heisler M, J Gen Intern Med 2008 23 1992 1999 10.1007/s11606-008-0814-7 18855075
9. Type 2 diabetes self-management social support intervention in the US-Mexico Border. McEwen MM, Pasvogel A, Gallegos G, Barrera L, Public Health Nurs 2010 27 310 319 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00860.x 20626831
10. Sarafino EP, Health Psychology: biopsychosocial interactions New York: Wiley 5 2005
11. Predictors of improvement in social support: five years effects of a structured intervention for caregivers of spouses with Alzheimer's disease. Drenta P, Clay OJ, Roth DL, Mittelman MS, Soc Sci Med 2006 63 957 967 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.02.020 16616406
12. Social support interventions: do they work? Hogan BE, Linden W, Najarian B, Clin Psychol Rev 2002 22 383 442 17201192
13. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, Health Behavior and Health Education: theory, research, and practice San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass 3 2008
14. Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Dennis CL, Int J Nurs Stud 2003 40 321 332 10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00092-5 12605954
15. Race/ethnicity, social support, and associations with diabetes self-care and clinical outcomes in NHANES. Rees CA, Karter AJ, Young BA, Diabetes Educ 2010 36 435 445 10.1177/0145721710364419 20332281
16. The Association of cognitive function and social support with glycemic control in adults with diabetes. Okura T, Heisler M, Langa KM, J Am Geriatr Soc 2009 57 1816 1824 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02431.x 19682129
17. A rural diabetes support group. Morris DB, Diabetes Educ 1998 24 493 497 10.1177/014572179802400408 9830953
18. Self-care behavior and related factors in older people with type 2 diabetes. Bai YL, Chiou CP, Chang YY, J Clin Nurs 2009 18 3308 3315 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02992.x 19930088
19. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support: dimensionality and age and gender differences in adolescents. Cheng ST, Chan ACM, Pers Indiv Differ 2004 37 1359 1369 10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.006
20. Initiation of health-behavior change among employees participating in a web-based health risk assessment with tailored feedback. Colkesen EB, Niessen MA, Peek N, Vosbergen S, Kraaijenhagen RA, van Kalken CK, Tijssen JG, Peters RJ, J Occup Med Toxico 2011 6 5 10.1186/1745-6673-6-5
21. Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Hawkins RP, Kreuter M, Resnicow K, Fishbein M, Dijkstra A, Health Educ Res 2008 23 454 466 10.1093/her/cyn004 18349033
22. Friedman MS, The Handbook of Health Psychology New York: Oxford University Press 2011
23. The qualitative content analysis process. Elo S, Kyngäs H, J Adv Nurs 2008 62 107 115 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x 18352969
24. Lincoln YS, Guba EG, Naturalistic Inquiry Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications 1985
25. Reliability and validity: a quick review. Fitzner K, Diabetes Educ 2007 33 775 780 10.1177/0145721707308172 17925583
26. Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Wynd CA, Schmidt B, Atkins Schaefer M, Western J Nurs Res 2003 25 508 518 10.1177/0193945903252998
27. Hajizadeh E, Asghari M, Statistical Methods and Analyses in Health and Biosciences: A Methodological Approach Tehran: ACECR Press 1 2011 [Persian]
28. The quantitative approach to content validity. Lawshe CH, Pers Psycho 1975 28 563 575 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
29. Waltz C, Bausell RB, Nursing Research: design, statistics and computer analysis Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Co 1983
30. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Polit DF, Beck CT, Res Nurs Health 2006 29 489 497 10.1002/nur.20147 16977646
31. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH, Psychometric Theory New York: Mc Graw-Hill Inc 3 1994
32. Mueller RO, Basic principles of structural equation modeling: an introduction to LISREL and EQS New York: Springer 1996
33. Munro BH, Statistical methods for health care research Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Co 5 2005
34. Kline RB, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling New York: Guilford Press 3 2010
35. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM, Psychol Methods 1996 1 130 149
36. Bollen KA, Long JS, Testing structural equation models Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 1993
37. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Hu L, Bentler PM, Struct Eq Model 1999 6 1 55 10.1080/10705519909540118
38. Schneider Z, Nursing research: an interactive learning London: Mosby Co. 1 2004
39. Litwin MS, How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 1995
40. Confidence limits for intra class reliability coefficients. Baumgartner TA, Chung H, Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 2001 5 179 188 10.1207/S15327841MPEE0503-4
41. SPSS Inc, SPSS 16.0 for Windows SPSS Inc, Chicago 2008
42. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D, LISREL 8.80 for Windows Lincolnwood, IL; Scientific Software International, Inc 2006
43. Social support questionnaire. http://www.innateliving.net/wp-content/ uploads/2012/05/social-support-questionnaire.pdf
44. Norbeck social support questionnaire (NSSQ). http://nurseweb.ucsf.edu
45. Sources of social support scale (SSSS). http://www.psy.miami.edu/faculty/ ccarver/sclSSSS.html
46. Measuring perceived social support: development of the child and adolescent social support scale (CASSS). Malecki CK, Demary MK, Psychol Sch 2002 39 1 18 10.1002/pits.10004
47. The diabetes social support questionnaire- family version: evaluating adolescents' diabetes- specific support from family members. La Greca AM, Bearman KJ, J Pediatr Psychol 2002 27 665 676 10.1093/jpepsy/27.8.665 12403857
48. Diabetes care profile. http://www.med.umich.edu/mdrtc/profs/documents/ svi/dcp.pdf
49. Unmet needs for social support and effects on diabetes self-care activities in Korean Americans with type 2 diabetes. Song Y, Song HJ, Han HR, Park SY, Nam S, Kim MT, Diabetes Educ 2012 38 77 85 10.1177/0145721711432456 22222514
50. Assessing friend support of adolescents' diabetes care: the diabetes social support questionnaire- Friends version. Bearman KJ, La Greca AM, J Pediatr Psychol 2002 27 417 428 10.1093/jpepsy/27.5.417 12058006
51. Peer support for self-management of diabetes improved outcomes in international settings. Fisher EB, Boothroyd RI, Coufal MM, Baumann LC, Mbanya JC, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Sanguanprasit B, Tanasugarn C, Health Aff 2012 31 130 139 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0914
52. Burns N, Grove SK, The practice of nursing research: conduct, critique & utilization Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders 5 2005 23057374
53. DeVellis RF, Scale development: Theory and Applications Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 2 2003