In-person versus telehealth assessment of discourse ability in adults with traumatic brain injury

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 424-432

  Turkstra, Lyn S ^a   Quinn Padron, Maura ^b   Johnson, Jacqueline E ^a   Workinger, Marilyn S ^b   Antoniotti, Nina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b MARSHFIELD CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

assessment; brain injury; communication; language; rehabilitation; telehealth; telerehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IN PERSON ASSESSMENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHOTOGRAPHY; PICTURE DESCRIPTION; RELIABILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TELEHEALTH; TELEMEDICINE; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; AGED; BRAIN INJURIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH; TELEMEDICINE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84870057286     PISSN: 08859701     EISSN: 1550509X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31823346fc     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Mashima PA, Doarn CR. Overview of telehealth activities in speech-language pathology. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(10):1101-1117.
2. Girard P. Military and VA telemedicine systems for patients with traumatic brain injury. J Rehab Res Devel. 2007;44(7):1017-1026.
3. Ricker JH, Rosenthal M, Garay E, et al. Telerehabilitation needs: a survey of persons with acquired brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002;17(3):242-250.
4. Darkins A, Cruise C, Armstrong M, Peters J, Finn M. Enhancing access of combat-wounded veterans to specialist rehabilitation services: the VA Polytrauma Telehealth Network. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(1):182-187.
5. Georgeadis AC, Brennan DM, Barker LM, Baron CR. Tel-erehabilitation and its effect on story retelling by adults with neurogenic communication disorders. Aphasiol. 2004;18:639-652.
6. Brennan DM, Georgeadis AC, Baron CR, Barker LM. The effect of videoconference-based telerehabilitation on story retelling performance by brain-injured subjects and its implications for remote speech-language therapy. Telemed J E Health. 2004;10(2):147-154.
7. Duffy JR, Werven GW, Aronson AE. Telemedicine and the diagnosis of speech and language disorders. Mayo Clin Proc. 1997;72(12):1116-1122.
8. Pagulayan KF, Temkin NR, Machamer J, Dikmen SS. A longitudinal study of health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(5):611-618.
9. McDonald S, Tate R, Togher L, et al. Social skills treatment for people with severe, chronic acquired brain injuries: a multicenter trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(9):1648-1659.
10. Dahlberg C, Hawley L, Morey C, Newman J, Cusick CP, Harrison-Felix C. Social communication skills in persons with post-acute traumatic brain injury: three perspectives. Brain Inj. 2006;20(4):425-435.
11. Turkstra LS, Coelho C, Ylvisaker M, et al. Practice guidelines for standardized assessment for persons with traumatic brain injury. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2005;13(2):ix-xxviii.
12. Douglas JM, Spellacy FJ. Correlates of depression in adults with severe traumatic brain injury and their carers. Brain Inj. 2000;14(1):71-88.
13. Finset A, Syrnes S, Krogstad JM, Berstad J. Self-reported social networks and interpersonal support 2 years after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 1995;9(2):141-150.
14. Wehman P, Kregel J, Sherron P, et al. Critical factors associated with the successful support employment placement of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 1993;7:31-44.
15. Gordon WA, Zafonte R, Cicerone K, et al. Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: state of the science. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(4):343-382.
16. Ylvisaker M, Turkstra LS, Coehlo C, et al. Behavioural interventions for children and adults with behaviour disorders after TBI: a systematic review of the evidence. Brain Inj. 2007;21(8):769-805.
17. Ehlhardt LA, Sohlberg MM, Kennedy M, et al. Evidence-based practice guidelines for instructing individuals with neurogenic memory impairments: what have we learned in the past 20 years? Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18(3):300-342.
18. Kennedy MR, Coelho C, Turkstra LS, et al. Intervention for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review, meta-analysis and clinical recommendations. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18(3):257-299.
19. Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Malec JF, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(8):1681-1692.
20. Bourgeois MS, Lenius K, Turkstra LS, Camp C. The effects of cognitive teletherapy on reported everyday memory behaviours of persons with chronic traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2007;21(12):1245-1257.
21. Dahlberg CA, Cusick CP, Hawley LA, et al. Treatment efficacy of social communication skills training after traumatic brain injury: a randomized treatment and deferred treatment controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(12):1561-1573.
22. Workinger MS, Netsell R. Restoration of intelligible speech 13 years post-head injury. Brain Inj. 1992;6(2):183-187.
23. Workinger MS. Who says they can't talk? Perspectives Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Dis. 1995;5(4):2-5.
24. Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Thomas KE. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitaliza-tions, and Deaths. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2006.
25. Brown J. Shortages in health care add challenges. The ASHA Leader. October 17, 2006.
26. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2010-2011 Edition, Speech-Language Pathologists. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor; 2011.
27. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Speech-Language Pathologists Providing Clinical Services via Telepractice: Position Statement. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2005.
28. Nelson EL, Palsbo S. Challenges in telemedicine equivalence studies. Eval Prog Plan. 2006;29(4):419-425.
29. Loh PK, Donaldson M, Flicker L, Maher S, Goldswain P. Development of a telemedicine protocol for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(2):90-94.
30. Cullum CM, Weiner MF, Gehrmann HR, Hynan LS. Feasibility of telecognitive assessment in dementia. Assessment. 2006;13(4):385-390.
31. McDonald S, Saunders JC. Differential impairment in recognition of emotion across different media in people with severe traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;11(4):392-399.
32. Turkstra LS. Conversation-based assessment of social cognition in adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2008;22(5):397-409.
33. Torsney K. Advantages and disadvantages of telerehabilita-tion for persons with neurological disabilities. Neuro Rehabil. 2003;18(2):183-185.
34. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: a practical scale. Lancet. 1975;1:480-484.
35. Hagan C. The Rancho Los Amigos Levels of Cognitive Functioning. 1st ed. Watertown, CT: Ellingsworth Press LLC; 1978.
36. Randolph C. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsycholog-ical Status. 1st ed. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 2001.
37. Hengst JA, Duff MC. Clinicians as communication partners: developing a mediated discourse elicitation protocol. Topics Lang Dis. 2007;27(1):37-49.
38. MacWhinney B. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.
39. Loban W. Language Development: Kindergarten Through Grade 12. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English; 1976. Report 18.
40. Coelho CA, Grela B, Corso M, Gamble A, Feinn R. Microlinguis-tic deficits in the narrative discourse of adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2005;19(13):1139-1145.
41. Body R, Perkins MR. Validation of linguistic analyses in narrative discourse after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2004;18(7):707-724.
42. Cherney LR, Shadden BB, Coelho CA, eds. Analyzing Discourse in Communicatively Impaired Adults. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc; 1998.
43. Wellek S. Testing Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence and Noninferi-ority. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2010.
44. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
45. Wade J, Mortley J, Enderby P. Talk about IT: views of people with aphasia and their partners on receiving remotely monitored computer-based word finding therapy. Aphasiol. 2003;17(11):1031-1056.
46. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. Horizon. 2001;9(5):1-6.
47. Cherney LR, Patterson JP, Raymer A, Frymark T, Schooling T. Evidence-based systematic review: effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51(5):1282-1299.
48. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Professional Issues in Telepractice for Speech-Language Pathologists [Professional Issues Statement]. Rockville, MD: Ad Hoc Committee on Telepractice in Speech-Language Pathology; 2010.
49. Ricker JH. Clinical and methodological considerations in the application of telerehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a commentary. Neuro Rehabil. 2003;18(2):179-181.