Bottom-up biases in feature-selective attention

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 32, Issue 47, 2012, Pages 16953-16958

  Andersen, Søren K ^a,b   Müller, Matthias M ^b   Martinovic, Jasna ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INERADIOGRAPHY; LUMINANCE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STIMULATION; TOPOGRAPHY; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84870033344     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 15292401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1767-12.2012     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andersen SK, Muller MM (2010) Behavioral performance follows the time course of neural facilitation and suppression during cued shifts of feature- selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:13878-13882. CrossRef Medline
2. Andersen SK, Muller MM, Hillyard SA (2011a) Tracking the allocation of attention in visual scenes with steady-state evoked potentials. In: Cognitive neuroscience of attention, Ed 2 (Posner MI, ed), pp 197-216. New York: Guilford.
3. Andersen SK, Fuchs S, Muller MM (2011b) Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing. J Cogn Neurosci 23:238-246. CrossRef Medline
4. Banton T, Levi DM (1993) The perceived strength of motion-defined edges. Perception 22:1195-1204. CrossRef Medline
5. Boynton GM (2005) Attention and visual perception. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:465-469. CrossRef Medline
6. Buffalo EA, Fries P, Landman R, Liang H, Desimone R (2010) A backward progression of attentional effects in the ventral stream. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA107:361-365. CrossRefMedline
7. Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134:9-21. CrossRef Medline
8. Desimone R, Duncan J (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 18:193-222. CrossRef Medline
9. Di Russo F, Pitzalis S, Aprile T, Spitoni G, Patria F, Stella A, Spinelli D, Hillyard SA (2007) Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady-state visual evoked potential. Hum Brain Mapp 28:323-334. CrossRef Medline
10. Duncan J, Humphreys G, Ward R (1997) Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Curr Opin Neurobiol 7:255-261. CrossRef Medline
11. Fuchs S, Andersen SK, Gruber T, Muller MM (2008) Attentional bias of competitive interactions in neuronal networks of early visual processing in the human brain. Neuroimage 41:1086-1101. CrossRef Medline
12. Junghöfer M, Elbert T, Tucker DM, Rockstroh B (2000) Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. Psychophysiology 37:523-532. CrossRef Medline
13. Kastner S, De Weerd P, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG (1998) Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. Science 282:108-111. CrossRef Medline
14. Kastner S, De Weerd P, Pinsk MA, Elizondo MI, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG (2001) Modulation of sensory suppression: implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 86:1398-1411. Medline
15. Lee J, Maunsell JH (2009) A normalization model of attentional modulation of single unit responses. PLoS One 4:e4651. CrossRef Medline
16. Luck SJ, Chelazzi L, Hillyard SA, Desimone R (1997) Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 77:24-42. Medline
17. Martinez-Trujillo JC, Treue S (2004) Feature-based attention increases the selectivity of population responses in primate visual cortex. Curr Biol 14:744-751. CrossRef Medline
18. Maunsell JH, Treue S (2006) Feature-based attention in visual cortex. Trends Neurosci 29:317-322. CrossRef Medline
19. Moulden B, Kingdom F, Gatley LF (1990) The standard deviation of luminance as a metric for contrast in random-dot images. Perception 19:79-101. CrossRef Medline
20. Pernier J, Perrin F, Bertrand O (1988) Scalp current density fields: concept and properties. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 69:385-389. CrossRef Medline
21. Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF (1989) Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 72:184-187. CrossRef Medline
22. Reynolds JH, Heeger DJ (2009) The normalization model of attention. Neuron 61:168-185. CrossRef Medline
23. Reynolds JH, Chelazzi L, Desimone R (1999) Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. J Neurosci 19:1736-1753. Medline
24. Saenz M, Buracas GT, Boynton GM (2002) Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 5:631-632. CrossRef Medline
25. Tenke CE, Kayser J (2005) Reference-free quantification of EEG spectra: combining current source density (CSD) and frequency principal components analysis (fPCA). Clin Neurophysiol 116:2826-2846. CrossRef Medline
26. Treue S, Martínez Trujillo JC (1999) Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature 399:575-579. CrossRef Medline
27. Yoshor D, Bosking WH, Ghose GM, Maunsell JH (2007) Receptive fields in human visual cortex mapped with surface electrodes. Cereb Cortex 17: 2293-2302. Medline