Endoscopic transforaminal decompression, interbody fusion, and percutaneous pedicle screw implantation of the lumbar spine: A case series report

International Journal of Spine Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 157-166

  Osman, Said G ^a  

^a American Spine Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Arthroscopic; BMP 2; ETDIF; Interbody; Percutaneous; Posterolateral

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; BLEEDING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE; DEGENERATIVE MOTION SEGMENTS WITH STENOSIS; ENDOSCOPIC TRANSFORAMINAL DECOMPRESSION; FEMALE; FRACTURE FIXATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LEG PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OSTEOLYSIS; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROLAND MORRIS DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; X RAY;

EID: 84870010148     PISSN: 22114599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Deyo R.A., Ciol M.A., Cherkin D.C., Loeser J.D., Bigos S.J. Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. Spine 1993, 18:1463-1470.
2. Baker J.K., Reardon P.R., Reardon M.J., Heggeness M.H. Vascular injury in anterior lumbar surgery. Spine 1993, 18:2227-2230.
3. Rihn J.A., Patel R., Makda J., et al. Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2009, 9:623-629.
4. Scaduto A.A., Gamradt S.C., Yu W.D., Huang J., Delamarter R.B., Wang J.C. Perioperative complications of threaded cylindrical lumbar interbody fusion devices: Anterior versus posterior approach. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003, 16:502-507.
5. Kawaguchi Y., Matsui H., Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 1: Histologic and histochemical analyses in rats. Spine 1994, 19:2590-2597.
6. Kawaguchi Y., Matsui H., Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 2: Histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. Spine 1994, 19:2598-2602.
7. Ozgur B.M., Agarwal V., Nail E., et al. Two-year clinical and radiographic success of minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach for the treatment of degenerative lumbar conditions. SAS J 2010, 4:41-46.
8. Rogers W.B., Cox C.S., Gerber E.J. Minimally invasive treatment (XLIF) of adjacent segment disease after prior lumbar fusions. Internet J Minim Invasive Spinal Technol 2010, 3.
9. Anand N., Rosemann R., Khalsa B., Baron E.M. Mid-term and long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 2010, 28:E6.
10. Dakwar E., Cardona R.F., Smith D.A., et al. Early outcomes and safely of minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for the adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 2010, 28:E8.
11. Villavicencio A.T., Burneikiene S., Roeca C.M., Nelson E.L., Mason A. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Surg Neurol Int 2010, 1:12.
12. Wang J., Zhou Y., Zhang Z.F., Li C.Q., Zheng W.J., Liu J. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J 2010, 19:1780-1784.
13. Schizas C., Tzinieris N., Tsiridis E., Kosmopoulos V. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop 2009, 33:1693-1698.
14. Dhall S.S., Wang M.Y., Mummaneni P.V. Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2008, 9:560-565.
15. Kambin P. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy. Arthroscopy 1992, 8:287-295.
16. Osman S.G., Marsolais E.B. Posterolateral arthroscopic discectomies of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 122-129.
17. Osman S.G., Marsolais E.B. Endoscopic transiliac approach to L5-S1 disc and foramen. A cadaver study. Spine 1997, 22:1259-1263.
18. Oliviera L., Marchi L., Coutinho E., et al. The use rh-BMP2 in stand alone extreme lateral interbody fusion (X-LIF): Clinical and radiological results after 24 months follow-up. World Spinal Column J 2010, 1:19-25.
19. Deluzio K.J., Lucio J.C., Rogers W.B. Value and cost in less invasive spinal fusion surgery: Lessons learned from a community hospital. SAS J 2010, 4:37-40.
20. Knight R.Q., Schwaegler P., Hanscom D., Roh J. Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: Early complication profile. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009, 22:34-37.
21. Yeung A.T., Yeung C.A. Minimally invasive techniques for the management of lumbar disc herniation. Orthop Clin North Am 2007, 38:363-372.
22. Hovorka I., Damotte A., Arcamone H., Argenson C., Boileau P. Lumbar videodiscectomy. Results in a prospective consecutive series [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2004, 90:312-318.
23. Hermantin F.U., Petters T., Quartararo L., et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing the results of open discectomy with those of video-assisted arthroscopic microsdiscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999, 81:958-965.