-
1
-
-
52049106874
-
Progesterone supplementation during cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles: Efficacy and convenience of two vaginal formulations
-
Lan VT, Taun PH, Canh LT, Tuong HM, Howles C. Progesterone supplementation during cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles: efficacy and convenience of two vaginal formulations. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17:318-323.
-
(2008)
Reprod Biomed Online
, vol.17
, pp. 318-323
-
-
Lan, V.T.1
Taun, P.H.2
Canh, L.T.3
Tuong, H.M.4
Howles, C.5
-
2
-
-
0037053575
-
Luteal phase support using either Crinone 8% or Utrogest: Results of a prospective, randomized study
-
Ludwig M, Schwartz P, Babahan B, Katalinic A, Weiss JM, Felderbaum R, Al-Hasani S, Diedrich K. Luteal phase support using either Crinone 8% or Utrogest: results of a prospective, randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002;103:48-52.
-
(2002)
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
, vol.103
, pp. 48-52
-
-
Ludwig, M.1
Schwartz, P.2
Babahan, B.3
Katalinic, A.4
Weiss, J.M.5
Felderbaum, R.6
Al-Hasani, S.7
Diedrich, K.8
-
3
-
-
0033642727
-
Impact of ovarian hyperstimulation on the luteal phase
-
Macklon NS, Fauser BC. Impact of ovarian hyperstimulation on the luteal phase. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 2000;55:101-108.
-
(2000)
J Reprod Fertil Suppl
, vol.55
, pp. 101-108
-
-
MacKlon, N.S.1
Fauser, B.C.2
-
4
-
-
0141992764
-
A randomized comparison of side effects and patient convenience of two vaginal progesterone formulations used for luteal support in in vitro fertilization cycles
-
Ng EH, Miao B, Cheung W, Ho PC. A randomized comparison of side effects and patient convenience of two vaginal progesterone formulations used for luteal support in in vitro fertilization cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;111:50-54.
-
(2003)
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
, vol.111
, pp. 50-54
-
-
Ng, E.H.1
Miao, B.2
Cheung, W.3
Ho, P.C.4
-
5
-
-
19044376672
-
Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology
-
Pabuccua R, Akara ME. Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2005;17:277-281.
-
(2005)
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol
, vol.17
, pp. 277-281
-
-
Pabuccua, R.1
Akara, M.E.2
-
6
-
-
0016799829
-
Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial
-
Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 1975;31:103-115.
-
(1975)
Biometrics
, vol.31
, pp. 103-115
-
-
Pocock, S.J.1
Simon, R.2
-
7
-
-
78049235099
-
Vaginal progesterone gel for luteal phase support in IVF/ICSI cycles: A meta-analysis
-
Polyzos NP, Messini CI, Papanikolaou EG, Mauri D, Tzioras S, Badawy A, Messinis I. Vaginal progesterone gel for luteal phase support in IVF/ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2083-2087.
-
(2010)
Fertil Steril
, vol.94
, pp. 2083-2087
-
-
Polyzos, N.P.1
Messini, C.I.2
Papanikolaou, E.G.3
Mauri, D.4
Tzioras, S.5
Badawy, A.6
Messinis, I.7
-
8
-
-
0035199818
-
A randomized study comparing Crinone 8% and intramuscular progesterone supplementation in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles
-
Probst AM, Hill JA, Ginsburg ES, Hurwitz S, Politch J, Yanushpolsky EH. A randomized study comparing Crinone 8% and intramuscular progesterone supplementation in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2001;76:1144-1149.
-
(2001)
Fertil Steril
, vol.76
, pp. 1144-1149
-
-
Probst, A.M.1
Hill, J.A.2
Ginsburg, E.S.3
Hurwitz, S.4
Politch, J.5
Yanushpolsky, E.H.6
-
9
-
-
84856375558
-
Vaginal (Crinone 8%) gel versus intramuscular progesterone in oil for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization: A large prospective trial
-
Silverberg KM, Vaughn TC, Hansard LJ, Burger NZ, Minter T. Vaginal (Crinone 8%) gel versus intramuscular progesterone in oil for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization: a large prospective trial. Fertil Steril 2012;97:344-348.
-
(2012)
Fertil Steril
, vol.97
, pp. 344-348
-
-
Silverberg, K.M.1
Vaughn, T.C.2
Hansard, L.J.3
Burger, N.Z.4
Minter, T.5
-
10
-
-
33845803171
-
Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of two vaginal progesterone formulations, Crinone 8% gel and Utrogestan capsules, used for luteal support
-
Simunic V, Tomic V, Tomic J, Nizic D. Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of two vaginal progesterone formulations, Crinone 8% gel and Utrogestan capsules, used for luteal support. Fertil Steril 2007; 87:83-87.
-
(2007)
Fertil Steril
, vol.87
, pp. 83-87
-
-
Simunic, V.1
Tomic, V.2
Tomic, J.3
Nizic, D.4
-
12
-
-
78650198949
-
Crinone vaginal gel is equally effective and better tolerated than intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles: A prospective randomised study
-
Yanushpolsky E, Hurwitz S, Greenberg L, Racowsky C, Hornstein M. Crinone vaginal gel is equally effective and better tolerated than intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles: a prospective randomised study. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2596-2599.
-
(2010)
Fertil Steril
, vol.94
, pp. 2596-2599
-
-
Yanushpolsky, E.1
Hurwitz, S.2
Greenberg, L.3
Racowsky, C.4
Hornstein, M.5
-
13
-
-
78751591343
-
Patterns of luteal phase bleeding in in vitro fertilization cycles supplemented with Crinone vaginal gel and with intramuscular progesterone-impact of luteal estrogen: Prospective, randomized study and post hoc analysis
-
Yanushpolsky E, Hurwitz S, Greenberg L, Racowsky C, Hornstein M. Patterns of luteal phase bleeding in in vitro fertilization cycles supplemented with Crinone vaginal gel and with intramuscular progesterone-impact of luteal estrogen: prospective, randomized study and post hoc analysis. Fertil Steril 2011;95:617-620.
-
(2011)
Fertil Steril
, vol.95
, pp. 617-620
-
-
Yanushpolsky, E.1
Hurwitz, S.2
Greenberg, L.3
Racowsky, C.4
Hornstein, M.5
-
14
-
-
67649097097
-
A meta-analysis of the route of administration of luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology: Vaginal versus intramuscular progesterone
-
Zarutskie PW, Phillips JA. A meta-analysis of the route of administration of luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology: vaginal versus intramuscular progesterone. Fertil Steril 2009;92:163-169.
-
(2009)
Fertil Steril
, vol.92
, pp. 163-169
-
-
Zarutskie, P.W.1
Phillips, J.A.2
|