Fertilization and irrigation effects on tree level aboveground net primary production, light interception and light use efficiency in a loblolly pine plantation

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 288, Issue , 2013, Pages 43-48

  Campoe, Otávio C ^a   Stape, José Luiz ^b   Albaugh, Timothy J ^b   Lee Allen, H ^b   Fox, Thomas R ^c   Rubilar, Rafael ^d   Binkley, Dan ^e  

^a Forestry Science and Research Institute IPEF   (Brazil)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CONCEPCIÓN   (Chile)

^e Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Dominance; Leaf area; MAESTRA model; Production ecology; Resource use; SETRES

Indexed keywords

DOMINANCE; GROWTH RESPONSE; INDIVIDUAL TREE; INDIVIDUAL TREE CROWN; INTENSITY OF COMPETITION; IRRIGATION EFFECTS; LEAF AREA; LEAF AREA INDEX; LIGHT CAPTURE; LIGHT INTERCEPTION; LIGHT USE EFFICIENCY; LOBLOLLY PINE; LOBLOLLY PINE PLANTATIONS; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION; PINUS TAEDA; PROCESS-BASED MODELS; RESOURCE USE; SETRES; SHIFTING PATTERNS; TREE LEVEL; TREE SIZE; WOOD BIOMASS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOLOGY; EFFICIENCY; IRRIGATION;

FORESTRY;

ABOVEGROUND PRODUCTION; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); GROWTH DETERMINATION; IRRIGATION; LIGHT USE EFFICIENCY; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; PLANTATION FORESTRY; SHIFTING CULTIVATION; TREE PLANTING;

BIOMASS; FERTILIZATION; FORESTRY; IRRIGATION; LIGHT ABSORPTION; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PINUS TAEDA; PRODUCTIVITY; RADIATION;

PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 84869886785     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.05.026     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Albaugh T.J., Allen H.L., Dougherty P.M., Johnsen K.H. Long term growth responses of loblolly pine to optimal nutrient and water resource availability. For. Ecol. Manage. 2004, 192:3-19.
2. Albaugh T.J., Allen H.L., Dougherty P.M., Kress L.W., King J.S. Leaf area and above- and belowground growth responses of loblolly pine to nutrient and water additions. For. Sci. 1998, 44:317-328.
3. Albaugh T.J., Allen H.L., Kress L.W. Root and stem partitioning of Pinus taeda. Trees: Struct. Func. 2006, 20:176-185.
4. Allen H.L. Forest fertilizers: nutrient amendment, stand productivity, and environmental impact. J. For. 1987, 85:37-46.
5. Aspinwall M.J., King J.S., McKeand S.E., Bullock B.P. Genetic effects on stand-level uniformity and above- and belowground dry mass production in juvenile loblolly pine. For. Ecol. Manage. 2011, 262:609-619.
6. Bauerle W.L., Bowden J.D., McLeod M.F., Toler J.E. Modeling intra-crown and intra-canopy interactions in red maple: assessment of light transfer on carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange. Tree Physiol. 2004, 24:589-597.
7. Binkley D., Stape J.L., Ryan M.G. Thinking about efficiency of resource use in forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 2004, 193:5-16.
8. Binkley D., Kashian D.M., Boyden S., Kaye M.W., Bradford J.B., Arthur M.A., Fornwalt P.J., Ryan M.G. Patterns of growth dominance in forests of the Rocky Mountains. USA For. Ecol. Manage. 2006, 236:193-201.
9. Binkley D., Stape J.L., Bauerle W.L., Ryan M.G. Explaining growth of individual trees: light interception and efficiency of light use by Eucalyptus at four sites in Brazil. For. Ecol. Manage. 2010, 259(9):1704-1713.
10. Bradford J.B., D'Amato A.W., Palik B.J., Fraver S. A new method for evaluating forest thinning: growth dominance in managed Pinus resinosa stands. Can. J. For. Res. 2010, 40:843-849.
11. Carlson C.A., Burkhart H.E., Allen H.L., Fox T.R. Absolute and relative changes in tree growth rates and changes to the stand diameter distribution of Pinus taeda as a result of midrotation fertilizer applications. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38:2063-2071.
12. Campoe O.C., Stape J.L., Nouvellon Y., Laclau J.-P., Bauerle W.L., Le Maire G., Binkley D. Stem production, light absorption and light use efficiency between dominant and non-dominant trees of Eucalyptus grandis across a productivity gradient in Brazil. For. Ecol. Manage. 2013, 288:14-20.
13. Doi B.T., Binkley D., Stape J.L. Does reverse growth dominance develop in old plantations of Eucalyptus saligna?. For. Ecol. Manage. 2010, 259:1815-1818.
14. Fernández M.E., Gyenge J. Testing Binkley's hypothesis about the interaction of individual tree water use efficiency and growth efficiency with dominance patterns in open and close canopy stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 257:1859-1865.
15. Fernández M.E., Tschieder E.F., Letourneau F., Gyenge J.E. Why do Pinus species have a different growth dominance patterns than Eucalyptus species? a hypothesis based on differential physiological plasticity. For. Ecol. Manage. 2011, 261:1061-1068.
16. Flores F.J., Allen H.L., Cheshire H., Davis J.M., Fuentes M., Kelting D.L. Using multispectral satellite imagery to estimate leaf area and response to silvicultural treatments in loblolly pine stands. Can. J. For. Res. 2006, 37(6):1587-1596.
17. Forrester D.I., Collopy J.J., Beadle C.L., Baker T.G. Effect of thinning, pruning and nitrogen fertiliser on light interception and light-use efficiency in a young Eucalyptus nitens plantation. For. Ecol. Manage. 2013, 288:21-30.
18. Fox T.R. Sustained productivity in intensively managed forest plantation. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 138:187-202.
19. Jarvis P.G., Leverenz J.W. Productivity of temperate, deciduous and evergreen forests. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, 12D Physiological Plant Ecology IV. Ecosystem Processes: Mineral Cycling, Productivity and Man's Influence 1983, 234-280. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. O.L. Lange, P.S. Nobel, C.B. Osmond, H. Ziegler (Eds.).
20. Jokela, E.J., 2004. Nutrient management of southern pines. In: Dickens, E.D., Barnett, J.P., Hubbard, W.G., Jokela, E.J. (Eds.), Slash pine: Still growing and Growing! Proceedings of the Slash Pine Symposium. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-76. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station Asheville, NC, pp. 27-35.
21. Le Maire G., Nouvellon Y., Christina M., Ponzoni F.J., Gonçalves J.L.M., Bouillet J.-P., Laclau J.-P. Tree and stand light use efficiencies over a full rotation of single- and mixed-species Eucalyptus grandis and Acacia mangium plantations. For. Ecol. Manage. 2013, 288:31-42.
22. Li-Cor, 1991.LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer Instruction Manual. Li-Cor, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA.
23. Liu J., Burkhart H. Spatial characteristics of diameter and total height in juvenile loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations. For. Sci. 1994, 40:774-786.
24. Maier C.A., Johnsen K.H., Butnor J., Kress L.W., Anderson P.H. Branch growth and gas exchange in 13-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) trees in response to elevated carbon dioxide concentration and fertilization. Tree Physiol. 2002, 22:1093-1106.
25. Maier C.A., Albaugh T.J., Allen H.L., Dougherty P.M. Respiratory carbon use and carbon storage in mid-rotation loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations: the effect of site resources on the stand carbon balance. Global Change Biol. 2004, 10:1335-1350.
26. Martin T.A., Jokela T.A. Developmental patterns and nutrition impact radiation use efficiency components in southern pine stands. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14:1839-1854.
27. Medlyn B.E., Berbigier P., Clement R., Grelle A., Loustau D., Linder S., Wingate L., Jarvis P.G., Sigurdsson B.D., McMurtrie R. Carbon balance of coniferous forests growing in contrasting climates: model-based analysis. Agr. For. Meteorol. 2005, 131:97-124.
28. Nilsson U., Allen H.L. Short and long term effects of site preparation, fertilization and vegetation control on growth and stand development of planted loblolly pine. For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 175:367-377.
29. Norman J.M. Modification of the Aerial Environment of Plants 1979, ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, p. 538.
30. Norman J.M., Welles J.M. Radiative transfer in an array of canopies. Agronomy J. 1983, 75(3):481-488.
31. Pangle L., Vose J.M., Teskey R.O. Radiation use efficiency in adjacent hardwood and pine forests in the southern Appalachians. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 257:1034-1042.
32. Radtke P.J., Westfall J.A., Burkhart H.E. Conditioning a distance-dependent competition index to indicate the onset of inter-tree competition. For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 175:17-30.
33. Sampson D.A., Albaugh T.J., Johnsen K.H., Allen H.L., Zarnoch S.J. Monthly leaf area index estimates from point-in-time measurements and needle phenology for Pinus taeda. Can. J. For. Res. 2003, 2477-2490.
34. Samuelson L.J., Johnsen K., Stokes T. Production, allocation, and stemwood growth efficiency of Pinus taeda L. stands in response to 6years of intensive management. For. Ecol. Manage. 2004, 192:59-70.
35. Stape J.L., Binkley D., Ryan M.G., Fonseca S., Loos R.A., Takahashi E.N., Silva C.R., Silva S.R., Hakamada R.E., Ferreira J.M., Lima A.M.N., Gava J.L., Leite F.P., Andrade H.B., Alves J.M., Silva G.G.C., Azevedo M.R. The Brazil Eucalyptus productivity project: influence of water, nutrients and stand uniformity on wood production. For. Ecol. Manage. 2010, 259(9):1684-1694.
36. Wang Y.P., Jarvis P.G. Description and validation of an array model - MAESTRO. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1990, 51(3-4):257-280.