Presidential Leadership and Public Opinion in an Age of Polarization

The Obama Presidency Change and Continuity

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 31-47

  Cohen, Jeffrey E ^a   Panagopoulos, Costas ^a  

^a FORDHAM UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869884122     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203831427     Document Type: Chapter

References (11)

1. Fiorina et al. (2004) argue that polarization is not very evident in the mass public.
2. Abramowitz (2010) contends that engaged citizens are highly polarized. for a review;
3. Layman et al. (2006). There is evidence of polarization by partisanship in attitudes towards the presidency in Bond and Fleisher (2001)
4. Newman and Siegle (2010). On the potential implications of polarization to the presidency
5. Cameron (2002).
6. Manheim’s (1979) Seminal study looks at honeymoons in a journalistic setting.
7. Dominguez (2009) Broadly assesses the potential for a honeymoon for Obama.
8. Bafumi et al. 2010
9. Gronke et al. 2003
10. Kernell 1977
11. Simon et al. 1991