Construction kits or virtual worlds; Management applications of E2E models

Journal of Marine Systems

Volumn 109-110, Issue , 2013, Pages 103-108

  Steele, John H ^a   Aydin, Kerim ^b   Gifford, Dian J ^c   Hofmann, Eileen E ^d  

^a WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION   (United States)

^b NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^d OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecosystem based management; End to end models; Management applications

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION KIT; ECOSYSTEM-BASED MANAGEMENT; INTERACTIVE PROCESS; MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT ISSUES; STRATEGIC EVALUATION; VIRTUAL WORLDS;

ECOSYSTEMS; MANAGERS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

DECISION MAKING;

DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; STRATEGIC APPROACH; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 84869882283     PISSN: 09247963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2011.10.016     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Auster P.J., Link J.S. Compensation and recovery of feeding guilds in a northwest Atlantic shelf fish community. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2009, 382:163-172.
2. Aydin K., McFarlane G.A., King J.R., Megrey B.A., Myers K.W. Linking oceanic food webs to coastal production and growth rates of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), using models on three scales. Deep Sea Research II 2005, 52:757-780.
3. Baretta J.W., Ebenhoh W., Ruardig P. The European-Regional-Sea-Ecosystem-Model, a complex marine ecosystem model. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 1995, 33:233-246.
4. Brand E.J., Kaplan I.C., Harvey C.J., Levin P.S., Fulton E.A., Hermann A.J., Field J.C. A spatially explicit ecosystem model of the California current's food web and oceanography. U.S. Dept. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-84 2007, 145 p.
5. Trophic models of aquatic ecosystems. The International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management (ICLARM) Conference Proceedings 1993, vol. 26. ICLARM, Manila, Philippines. V. Christensen, D. Pauly (Eds.).
6. Christensen V., Walters C.J. Ecopath with Ecosim: methods, capabilities and limitations. Ecological Modelling 2004, 172:109-139.
7. DeAngelis D.L. Energy flow, nutrient recycling and ecosystem resilience. Ecology 1980, 61:764-771.
8. DeYoung B., Werner F., Chai F., Megrey B., Monfray P. Challenges of modeling ocean basin ecosystems. Science 2004, 304:1463-1466.
9. Elzinga C.L., Salzer D.W., Willoughby J.W. Measuring and monitoring plant populations. Bureau of Land Management.BLM Tech. Ref. 1730-1 1998.
10. Friedrichs M., Hood R., Wiggert J. Ecosystem model complexity versus physical forcing; quantification of their relative impact with assimilated Arabian Sea data. Deep Sea Research 2006, 52:576-600.
11. Friedrichs M., Dusenberry J., Anderson L., Armstrong R., Chai F., Christian J., Doney S., Dunne J., Fujii M., Hood R., McGillicuddy D., Moore J., Spitz Y., Wiggert J. Assessment of skill and portability in regional marine biogeochemical models; the role of multiple planktonic groups. Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans 2007, 112:C08001.
12. Fulton E.A. Approaches to end to end ecosystem models. Journal of Marine Systems 2010, 81:171-183.
13. Fulton E.A., Smith A.D.M. Lessons learnt from a comparison of three ecosystem models for Port Phillip Bay, Australia. African Journal of Marine Science 2007, 26:219-243.
14. Fulton E., Smith A., Johnson C. Biogeochemical systems models I: IGBEM-a model of marine bay ecosystems. Ecological Modelling 2004, 174:267-307.
15. Gaichas S., Skaret G., Falk-Petersen J., Link J., Overholtz W., Megrey B., Gjøsæter B., Stockhausen W., Dommasnes A., Friedland K., Aydin K. A comparison of community and trophic structure in five marine ecosystems based on energy budgets and system metrics. Progress in Oceanography 2009, 81:47-62.
16. Garrison L.P., Link J.S. Dietary guild structure of the fish community in the north-east United States continental shelf ecosystem. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2000, 202:231-240.
17. Gifford D.J., Collie J.S., Steele J.H. Functional diversity in a marine fish community. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2009, 66. 10.1093/icesjms/fsp076.
18. Haidvogel D.B., Arango H.G., Hedstrom K., Beckmann A., Malanotte-Rizzoli P., Shchepetkin A.F. Model evaluation experiments in the North Atlantic Basin: simulations in nonlinear terrain-following coordinates. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans 2000, 32:239-281.
19. Hall S.J., Collie J.S., Duplisea D.E., Jennings S., Bravington M., Link J. A length-based multispecies model for evaluating community responses to fishing. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2006, 63:1344-1359.
20. Hannah C., Vezina A., St John M. The case for marine ecosystem models of intermediate complexity. Progress in Oceanography 2010, 84:121-126.
21. Heath M.R. Changes in the structure and function of the North Sea fish food web, 1973-2000, and the impacts of fishing and climate. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2005, 62:847-868.
22. Heath M.R., Beare D.J. New primary production in northwest European seas, 1960-2003. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2008, 363:183-203.
23. Hofmann E.E. Plankton functional groups-an assessment. Progress in Oceanography 2010, 84:16-19.
24. Jennings S., Blanchard J. Fish abundance with no fishing: predictions based on macroecological theory. Journal of Animal Ecology 2004, 73:632-642.
25. Kaplan I., Levin P., Burden M., Fulton E. Fishing catch shares in the face of global change: a framework for integrating cumulative impacts and single species management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2010, 67:1968-1982.
26. Larkin P.A. An epitaph for the concept of maximum sustainable yield. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 1977, 106:1-11.
27. Lee K.N. Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology 1999, 3:3.
28. Lehodey P., Chai F., Hampton J. Modelling climate related variability of tuna populations from a coupled ocean-biogeochemical-populations dynamics model. Fisheries Oceanography 2003, 12(4):483-494.
29. Lindeman R.I. The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 1942, 23:399-418.
30. Link J., Overholtz W., O'Reilly J., Green J., Dow D., Palka D., Legault C., Vitaliano J., Guida V., Fogarty M., Brodziak M., Methratta L., Stockhausen W., Col L., Griswold C. The Northeast U.S. continental shelf Energy Modeling and Analysis exercise (EMAX): ecological network model development and basic ecosystem metrics. Journal of Marine Systems 2008, 74:453-474. 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.03.007.
31. Link J.S., Fulton E.A., Gamble R.J. The northeast US application of ATLANTIS: a full system model exploring marine ecosystem dynamics in a living marine resource management context. Progress in Oceanography 2010, 87:214-234.
32. Mace P.M. A new role for MSY in single-species and ecosystem approaches to fisheries assessment and management. Fish and Fisheries 2001, 2:2-32.
33. Mangel M., Levin P.S. Regime, phase and paradigm shifts: making community ecology the basic science for fisheries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2005, 360:95-105.
34. Meuter F.J., Megrey B.A. Using multi-species surplus production models to estimate ecosystem-level maximum sustainable yields. Fisheries Research 2006, 81:189-201.
35. Moloney C., St John M., Denman K., Karl D., Koster F., Sundby S., Wilson R. Weaving marine food webs from end to end under global change. J. Mar. Sys. 2010, 84:212-229.
36. Murawski S., Steele J., Taylor P., Fogarty M., Sissenwine M., Ford M., Suchman C. Why compare marine ecosystems?. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2010, 67:1-9.
37. NOAA Integrated ecosystem assessments. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-92 2008.
38. Pascual M., Dunne J.A. Ecological Networks: Linking Structure to Dynamics in Food Webs 2006, Oxford University Press, USA.
39. Pauly D., Christensen W., Walters C. Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2000, 57(3):697-706.
40. Perry R.I., Cury P., Brander K., Jennings S., Mollmann C., Planque B. Sensitivity of marine systems to climate and fishing: concepts, issues and management response. J. Mar. Sys. 2010, 79:427-435.
41. Plaganyi E.E. Models for an ecosystem approach to fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 2007, 477.
42. Plaganyi E.E., Butterworth D.S. A critical look at the potential of ECOSIM with ECOPATH to assist in practical fisheries management. African Journal of Marine Science 2004, 26:261-287.
43. Platt T., Denman K. The structure of pelagic marine ecosystems. Rapp. P.-V. Reun. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer 1978, 173:60-65.
44. Pope J.G., Rice J.C., Daan N., Jennings S., Gislason H. Modelling an exploited marine fish community with 15 parameters-results from a simple size-based model. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2006, 63:1029-1044.
45. Richardson T., Jackson G., Ducklow H., Roman M. Carbon fluxes through food webs of the eastern equatorial Pacific: an inverse approach. Deep-Sea Research I 2004, 51:1245-1274.
46. Rose K.A., et al. End-to-end models for the analysis of marine ecosystems: challenges, issues and next steps. Marine and Coastal Fisheries 2010, 2:115-130.
47. Scheffer M., Carpenter S. Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2003, 18:648-656.
48. Scheffer, et al. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 2001, 413:591-596.
49. Shannon L.J., Cury P., Jarre A. Modelling effects of fishing in the Southern Benguela ecosystem. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2000, 57:720-722.
50. Shin Y.-J., Rochet M.-J., Jennings S., Field J.G., Gislason Can simple be useful and reliable? Using ecological indicators to represent and compare the states of marine ecosystems. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2010, 67:717-731.
51. Sissenwine M.P., Cohen E.B., Grosslein M.D. Structure of the Georges Bank ecosystem. Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer 1984, 183:243-254.
52. Steele J.H. The Structure of Marine Ecosystems 1974, 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
53. Steele J.H. Assessment of some linear food web methods. Journal of Marine Systems 2009, 76:186-194.
54. Steele J.H., Gifford D.J. Reconciling end-to-end and population concepts for marine ecosystems. J. Mar. Sys. 2010, 83:99-103.
55. Steele J.H., Collie J.S., Bisagni J., Fogarty M., Gifford D., Link M., Sieracki M., Sullivan B., Beet A., Mountain D., Durbin E.G., Palka D., Stockhausen W. Balancing end-to-end budgets of the Georges Bank ecosystem. Progress in Oceanography 2007, 74:423-448.
56. Stow C., Joliff J., McGillicuddy D., Doney C., Allen J., Friedrichs M., Rose K., Wallhead P. Skill assessment for coupled biological/physical models of marine systems. J. Mar. Sys. 2009, 76:4-15.
57. Travers M., Shin Y., Jenning S., Cury P. Towards end-to-end models for investigating the effects of climate and fishing in marine ecosystems. Progress in Oceanography 2007, 75:751-770.
58. Vezina A.R., Platt T. Food web dynamics in the ocean I. Best estimates of flow networks using inverse methods. Marine Ecology Progress Series 1988, 42:269-287.
59. Coupled biological and physical studies of plankton populations: Georges Bank and related regions. Deep Sea Res. 2001, 48:1-684.